Fixed.
->bou...@alt.net (ISP_Ratings) wrote:
->[n.a.c:]
->>official news.admin.* group
->
->It is? Are there unofficial ones?
So many cabal have claimed--remember that big rigged vote
on the news.admin.* reorg years back? news.admin.policy
added to the newsgroup line in its honor.
->> That's called internal cabal corruption.
->
->Does this make you offcially Cabal?
According to Mr. Lewis I was incorrect and I accept
that. That's two mistakes I've made in my life now.
->Looks like the same bot-stuff being posted elsewhere, e.g. nanam.
->I don't think the Cabal approves, really.
-
-Actually probably one of Steve's friends running HipSlime's bot - have
-a hard time understanding why he should be concerned.
Just would like to know who it is--have a little chat you know.
-After all - if one may phuque up Usenet - All may phuque up Usenet,
-eh??
True--you are of course referring to cancels--the correct statement
you obviously meant is that 'If one may cancel all may cancel'. I
fully agree.
Steve
news.admin.censorship
-------------------------
http://www.churchstate.net