Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Who's flooding news.admin.censorship and an example of Cabal Hypocracy

Skip to first unread message


May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to (Roswell Coverup {Sam Borg 7 of 9}
[Honorable Rev. JoWazzoo] ) wrote:
- (Jeffery J. Leader) Quacked:
->[ngs censored]


-> (ISP_Ratings) wrote:
->>official news.admin.* group
->It is? Are there unofficial ones?

So many cabal have claimed--remember that big rigged vote
on the news.admin.* reorg years back? news.admin.policy
added to the newsgroup line in its honor.

->> That's called internal cabal corruption.
->Does this make you offcially Cabal?

According to Mr. Lewis I was incorrect and I accept
that. That's two mistakes I've made in my life now.

->Looks like the same bot-stuff being posted elsewhere, e.g. nanam.
->I don't think the Cabal approves, really.
-Actually probably one of Steve's friends running HipSlime's bot - have
-a hard time understanding why he should be concerned.

Just would like to know who it is--have a little chat you know.

-After all - if one may phuque up Usenet - All may phuque up Usenet,

True--you are of course referring to cancels--the correct statement
you obviously meant is that 'If one may cancel all may cancel'. I
fully agree.


0 new messages