Usenet Peering

[The Doctor]

Looks for peers as always.

Check out https://ns2.nk.ca/ for ewb stats.
Cotactme for details to peer.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nk.ca Ici doc...@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com

[Grant Taylor]

On 12/22/23 08:16, The Doctor wrote:
> Looks for peers as always.

Send me a direct email and we can set things up.



--
Grant. . . .

[D]

awaiting google2news to vanish ~62 days from now, other parts
of your sig seem to be out of date, "mindspring", "antichrist"
(e.g. "nunc antichristi multi facti sunt" i ioannis 2:18) etc.
atheist is scientific reality, christian is a roman invention

[immibis]

On 12/22/23 16:29, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 12/22/23 08:16, The Doctor wrote:
>> Looks for peers as always.
>
> Send me a direct email and we can set things up.
>

I wouldn't peer with this guy, he's a spammy troll and seems to be the
only user on his server.
See, for example, Message-ID: <um04qr$1gfm$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca> where he
calls someone a pedophile out of the blue (for thinking Israel is bad),
or 100% of his posts in the Palestine thread in
or.politics,alt.support.schizophrenia,alt.society.liberalism,edm.general,sci.math
.

In fact, I reported him to his ISP, only to be told that he *is* his
ISP. Then I suggested maybe reporting him to his peer for de-peering,
and at this exact moment he goes looking for more peers.

As I said, I would strongly advise against peering with him.

[immibis]

On 12/22/23 17:33, immibis wrote:
> As I said, I would strongly advise against peering with him.

That is, assuming you don't like trolls. If you want the network to
contain more trolls, I can't stop you from peering. The content coming
off his node is almost as bad as dizum.

[immibis]

On 12/23/23 13:06, noel wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:33:41 +0100, immibis wrote:
>
> Being a troll, which is open to indivudal interpretation, is hardly a
> violation of an ISP's T&C's, spamming typically is, but don't confuse the
> two, which many here seem to - when it suits them that is.
>
> ISP's tend to go off old school thought for spamming, ie: promting
> something that has monetary value, just because someone posts 50 articles
> you disagree with does not make them a spammer (or even a troll)
>
> -noel
> (running ISP's since the 2400b dialup days and whos dealt with, I'd
> hazard a guess at tens of thousands of abuse related complaints over that
> time)

The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to offend
people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't matter, though,
since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.

[Nigel Reed]

On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100
immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:


> The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
> offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't matter,
> though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.

People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be offended.



--
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23

[Nigel Reed]

On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 15:33:29 -0600
Nigel Reed <sy...@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100
> immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>
>
> > The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
> > offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't
> > matter, though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.
>
> People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be
> offended.

*be

[D]

On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 15:33:29 -0600, Nigel Reed <sy...@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100
>immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>
>> The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
>> offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't matter,
>> though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.
>
>People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be offended.

the op's prolific contributions are anything but "offensive";
gosh, the "depeer google now" campaign might be attributable
to him more than any other admin or anti-gg activists around

[immibis]

On 12/23/23 22:33, Nigel Reed wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100
> immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>
>
>> The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
>> offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't matter,
>> though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.
>
> People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be offended.
>

If you were literate, you would have noticed that I didn't say anything
about people being offended.

[D]

a bruised ego can heal up or maybe not . . . lease with option to buy

[Sn!pe]

Above this we see prime examples of the old adage that
offense is taken rather than given. Happy Mithras!

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon wishes Happy Mithras to all Usenetters.

[The Doctor]

In article <1qm8ypv.1nc95em1r9pr3kN%snip...@gmail.com>,

Sn!pe <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>D <J@M> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 11:43:09 +0100, immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>> >On 12/23/23 22:33, Nigel Reed wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100
>> >> immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
>> >>> offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't matter,
>> >>> though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.
>> >>
>> >> People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be offended.
>> >
>> >If you were literate, you would have noticed that I didn't say anything
>> >about people being offended.
>>
>> a bruised ego can heal up or maybe not . . . lease with option to buy
>
>Above this we see prime examples of the old adage that
>offense is taken rather than given. Happy Mithras!
>

Cheers!

>--
>^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator
>
>My pet rock Gordon wishes Happy Mithras to all Usenetters.

[Grant Taylor]

On 12/22/23 10:33, immibis wrote:
> In fact, I reported him to his ISP, only to be told that he *is* his
> ISP.

That is a risk that is taken with every new peer.

I have to trust that people will reach out to me if I'm carrying traffic
from a peer that is a problem. With that knowledge I then need to
decide what to do.

Thank you for your input.



Grant. . . .

[Grant Taylor]

On 12/23/23 06:06, noel wrote:
> Being a troll, which is open to indivudal interpretation, is hardly a
> violation of an ISP's T&C's, spamming typically is, but don't confuse
> the two, which many here seem to - when it suits them that is.

Agreed.

I think that a troll can engage someone in conversation / debate, even
heated forms thereof, while being completely on topic and polite.

I view that as civil discourse which is in and of itself encouraged.

I will not block someone simply for disagreeing with their content.

> ISP's tend to go off old school thought for spamming, ie: promting
> something that has monetary value, just because someone posts 50
> articles you disagree with does not make them a spammer (or even
> a troll)

Spaming and flooding are two very different things to me. Flooding is a
(significantly) disproportionate number of articles. Spam tends to be
off topic and / or trying to persuade someone to do something, often
purchase / trade something.

> (running ISP's since the 2400b dialup days and whos dealt with, I'd
> hazard a guess at tens of thousands of abuse related complaints over
> that time)

I'll buy the next round of coffee noel.

[Grant Taylor]

On 12/24/23 08:28, Sn!pe wrote:
> Above this we see prime examples of the old adage that
> offense is taken rather than given. Happy Mithras!

LOL

Sometimes something is given with the intention of it being taken
offensively.



Grant. . . .

[Adam H. Kerman]

Grant Taylor <gta...@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
>On 12/23/23 06:06, noel wrote:

>>Being a troll, which is open to indivudal interpretation, is hardly a
>>violation of an ISP's T&C's, spamming typically is, but don't confuse
>>the two, which many here seem to - when it suits them that is.

>Agreed.

>I think that a troll can engage someone in conversation / debate, even
>heated forms thereof, while being completely on topic and polite.

Where is the trolling taking place, then? A troll's purpose is to
distract from on topic discussion. In your hypothetical, it's on topic.

>. . .

[immibis]

Sn!pe is another user who frequently intends to offend.

There's an adage in "micro-politics" that every organization which is
not explicitly left-wing tends to become right-wing over time, as Nazis
are much more likely to co-opt power structures than normal people are
to remove Nazis from them. Something similar applies to trolls in
unmoderated spaces...

[immibis]

On 12/24/23 19:52, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I think that a troll can engage someone in conversation / debate, even
> heated forms thereof, while being completely on topic and polite.
>

How do you classify a person whose engagement very rarely goes beyond
"You are a pedophile!" or "You are a terrorist!" or "Go % !!" ?

[Sn!pe]

You seem strangely familiar, immibis. Do I know you under a different
name, perhaps in a different place? Whatever, Happy Mithras to you. :)

P. S. Godwin alert ! [eot; xpost & fu2: bit-bucket]

[Adam H. Kerman]

immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>On 12/24/23 19:54, Grant Taylor wrote:
>>On 12/24/23 08:28, Sn!pe wrote:

>>>Above this we see prime examples of the old adage that
>>>offense is taken rather than given. Happy Mithras!

>>LOL

>>Sometimes something is given with the intention of it being taken
>>offensively.

>Sn!pe is another user who frequently intends to offend.

You acidic tears burnt through this sockpuppet in record time, seamus.

>. . .

[Nigel Reed]

On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 11:43:09 +0100

What a nugget.

[Adam H. Kerman]

Nigel Reed <sy...@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:
>Sun, 24 Dec 2023 11:43:09 +0100 immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>>On 12/23/23 22:33, Nigel Reed wrote:
>>>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100 immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:

>>>>The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
>>>>offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't
>>>>matter, though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.

>>>People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be
>>>offended.

>>If you were literate, you would have noticed that I didn't say
>>anything about people being offended.

>What a nugget.

seamus rains sunshine upon Usenet.

[The Doctor]

In article <20231224204...@wibble.sysadmininc.com>,

Nigel Reed <sy...@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 11:43:09 +0100
>immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/23/23 22:33, Nigel Reed wrote:
>> > On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:40:07 +0100
>> > immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> The Doctor's ISP's AUP is that you shouldn't deliberately aim to
>> >> offend people, which The Doctor does all the time. It doesn't
>> >> matter, though, since The Doctor is apparently his own ISP.
>> >
>> > People are only offended if they want to me. Choose not to be
>> > offended.
>>
>> If you were literate, you would have noticed that I didn't say
>> anything about people being offended.
>>
>
>What a nugget.
>

Indeed!

>--
>End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
>telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
>
>

[immibis]

On 12/25/23 05:31, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <20231224204...@wibble.sysadmininc.com>,
> Nigel Reed <sy...@endofthelinebbs.com> wrote:
>>

>> What a nugget.
>>
>
> Indeed!
>

This exemplifies The Doctor's usual posting style - pure noise.

[D]

hmm...
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nugget+slang

e.g.
http://onlineslangdictionary.com/meaning-definition-of/nugget
>a strange or silly person, or one who has done just done something silly.
>a disliked person.
>a potent flower ("bud") of marijuana. Also called nugz, nuggy nugs, ...
>Slang terms with the same meaning
>Other terms relating to 'crazy, insane, weird, strange person':
> crack head
> strange duck
> perve
> psycho-b*tch
> spaz
> mad hatter
> crazy-pants
> looper
> cuckoo
> yahoo
> wackadoodle
> funky monkey
> kook
> nut
> fruitcake
[end quoted excerpt]

[The Doctor]

In article <658cbaf3$1...@news.ausics.net>, noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

>and your contribution is, what exactly?
>...more noise..
>
>There is a saying in some parts of the world: POT, KETTLE, BLACK

The obvious!

[Snit]

On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:32:17 +0100 immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
On Dec 24, 2023, immibis wrote
(in article<news:umaiih$2oojb$1...@dont-email.me>):

> Sn!pe is another user who frequently intends to offend.

Sn!pe is a small child - mentally stunted - much like Rod Speed who employs
personal attacks to feel better about his own utterly worthless existence.

[Sn!pe]

Hi, Snit, how did you escape my killfile? Are you the ~real~ Snit?

[rhetorical questions, no need to reply; followups to the bit-bucket]

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[Sn!pe]

Sn!pe (apologies for fu2 self) <snip...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Snit <sn...@nospam.it> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:32:17 +0100 immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 24, 2023, immibis wrote
> > (in article<news:umaiih$2oojb$1...@dont-email.me>):
> >
> > > Sn!pe is another user who frequently intends to offend.
> >
> > Sn!pe is a small child - mentally stunted - much like Rod Speed who employs
> > personal attacks to feel better about his own utterly worthless existence.
> >
>
> Hi, Snit, how did you escape my killfile? Are you the ~real~ Snit?
>
> [rhetorical questions, no need to reply; followups to the bit-bucket]
>

Supplementary (apologies)

It seems that I have a new stalker. I note that the real Snit uses:

From: Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> and posts on
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net with
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)

I also note that the form of words above is almost identical
to those written by a previous antagonist (I'll refrain from
naming him for the time being.)

[Followup-To: alt.dev.null]

[Sn!pe]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

> For someone who complains about others being trolls and antagonists, you
> sure as hell need to look in the mirror.
>
> in other words fuck off ... nobody cares... how fucking old are you 12...
> (thats not a question either)
>
>
> PS
> my apologies to any 12yo's reading this for lumping that whiny turd into
> your era.
>

Pardon me for defending myself against a forging stalker. [shrug]
You're entitled to your opinion and you know what you should do now.

[fu2: adn - again]

[Ivo Gandolfo]

On 22/12/2023 15:16, The Doctor wrote:
> Looks for peers as always.
>
> Check out https://ns2.nk.ca/ for ewb stats.
> Cotactme for details to peer.


https://www.bofh.team/info.txt

Send me your side


Sincerely

--
ivo Gandolfo

[Sn!pe]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 23:57:25 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
[...]

> >
> > Pardon me for defending myself against a forging stalker. [shrug]
> > You're entitled to your opinion and you know what you should do now.
> >
> > [fu2: adn - again]
>

> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade I
> have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is not
> the group for your childish hissy fits.
>

Then I must apologise to you, noel, and to the group. I did not realise
that I was causing such annoyance, I will not trouble you again. I have
one request: please don't judge all users of Eternal September by your
opinion of me; they are blameless. Goodbye.

--
^Ď^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

[Adam W.]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade I
> have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is not
> the group for your childish hissy fits.

Are you the sole user of your server? Just curious...

[The Doctor]

In article <ummq74$t8m$4$arn...@news.chmurka.net>,

I know I am not!

[SugarBug]

On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:38:27 -0000 (UTC)
doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

<snip>

I sought Roast Master material and all I got was borkage.

The HTTPS link in your signature is borked:

> 502 Bad Gateway
> Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2

--
NightBulb Blog | Flip the night switch. | Flee religious brainwashing.
| https://blog.nightbulb.net

[The Doctor]

In article <20231229180157.63d1d3e7@dev>, SugarBug <38...@sugar.bug> wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:38:27 -0000 (UTC)
>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>I sought Roast Master material and all I got was borkage.
>
>The HTTPS link in your signature is borked:
>
>> 502 Bad Gateway
>> Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2
>

https://ns2.nk.ca/ ?

I doubt it.

>--
>NightBulb Blog | Flip the night switch. | Flee religious brainwashing.
> | https://blog.nightbulb.net
>

[D]

On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 18:01:57 -0600, SugarBug <38...@sugar.bug> wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:38:27 -0000 (UTC)
>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
><snip>
>
>I sought Roast Master material and all I got was borkage.
>The HTTPS link in your signature is borked:
>
>> 502 Bad Gateway
>> Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2

controversy stimulates commentary, e.g. this sig excerpt . . .

>>Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism

if atheism were a religion, it would be the only true religion

[Jesse Rehmer]

On Dec 29, 2023 at 7:26:01 PM CST, "The Doctor" <The Doctor> wrote:

> In article <20231229180157.63d1d3e7@dev>, SugarBug <38...@sugar.bug> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:38:27 -0000 (UTC)
>> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> I sought Roast Master material and all I got was borkage.
>>
>> The HTTPS link in your signature is borked:
>>
>>> 502 Bad Gateway
>>> Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2
>>
> https://ns2.nk.ca/ ?
>
> I doubt it.
>
>> --
>> NightBulb Blog | Flip the night switch. | Flee religious brainwashing.
>> | https://blog.nightbulb.net
>>

They mean mindsping.com. Been dead since about 2008-2009.

[Tom Furie]

doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) writes:
> In article <20231229180157.63d1d3e7@dev>, SugarBug <38...@sugar.bug> wrote:
>>The HTTPS link in your signature is borked:
>>> 502 Bad Gateway
>>> Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2
> https://ns2.nk.ca/ ?
>
> I doubt it.

Is that the link in your sig? No, it isn't.

[The Doctor]

In article <umnurn$47c$1...@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>,

One thing I cannot understand is why provider offer something
that should not be there.

[The Doctor]

In article <umnv63$jjq$1...@freeq.furie.org.uk>,

That link!

[Adam W.]

> far from it, run it since I went from a BBS to ISP decades ago, I dont
> really have the time to bother too much with usenet these days though,
> much older means family life :)

So you block the guy on your server and you're ready to block e-s (so
traffic from other, legitimate users as well) at the expense of your
users?

Wouldn't it be better to just use a personal killfile and let your users
decide for themselves?

[SugarBug]

On 31 Dec 2023 15:19:49 +1000
noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

> If you post junk in forums you'll get your arse kicked off, mailing
> lists the same, so why do you think usenet should be different.

Well said. I reserve my opinion on why some think it is different. The
truth is not very flattering to them.

In parable: Why don't sharks eat each lawyers? Professional courtesy.

--
CRYP7010G3R | Life is a numbers game. | Heist a hidden jackpot.
<69cd23ef630708e7ad98f2bfc2a159c9$1...@sybershock.com>
38...@sugar.bug | sybershock.com | alt.sources.crypto

[immibis]

On 12/28/23 13:20, Sn!pe wrote:
> Snit <sn...@nospam.it> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:32:17 +0100 immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 24, 2023, immibis wrote
>> (in article<news:umaiih$2oojb$1...@dont-email.me>):
>>
>>> Sn!pe is another user who frequently intends to offend.
>>
>> Sn!pe is a small child - mentally stunted - much like Rod Speed who employs
>> personal attacks to feel better about his own utterly worthless existence.
>>
>
> Hi, Snit, how did you escape my killfile? Are you the ~real~ Snit?
>
> [rhetorical questions, no need to reply; followups to the bit-bucket]
>

If you really didn't care what they had to say, you wouldn't have sent this.

[immibis]

On 12/29/23 05:30, noel wrote:
>
> yes I do, block all posts from you on our news server and if you evade I
> have zero hesitation in blocking all of eternal september, this is not
> the group for your childish hissy fits.
>

The internet will be better off, if the kinds of people who cut
themselves off from the internet just because of one user would actually
do so.

[immibis]

On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:
> I have not blocked them at this point in time because they acknowledged
> and apologised.
>
> However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
> think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?

Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.

[immibis]

On 12/28/23 01:01, noel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 13:18:41 +0100, immibis wrote:
>

[immibis]

I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
bofh.team.

[Adam W.]

immibis <ne...@immibis.com> wrote:

> I take this as an indication to blacklist anything that passed through
> bofh.team.

Wouldn't it be better to just blacklist nk.ca if you wish so?

[Sn!pe]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

> the internet would be better off if muppets like you fucked off, looks
> like your apology was as I suspected, but gave you the benefit of the
> doubt, only sarcasim, consider all your posts no longer readable here, or
> at any downstream service I feed, so dont bother replying, but cunts like
> you have mental disorders where you cant help yourself, you always feel
> the need to beat your fat cellulite chests any chance you get so you
> will, pitty you wont score any brownie points because it wont be seen.
>

immibis and I are ~not~ the same person; I had not met him before our
recent encounter here in the news hierarchy groups. I am here ~only~
in my primary persona, namely Sn!pe. This article is my first in this
group since my well-meaning, grovelling, apology three days ago in:
Message-ID: <1qmhz5a.1om1ays1p23q5cN%snip...@gmail.com>

Your bullying bluster says a great deal about you, noel. I will make no
further comment. Of course you won't read this; now kill-file me and be
done with it. I will do likewise.

--
^Ď^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

[Ivo Gandolfo]

The biggest problem is that this genie didn't understand that I'm not
the only upstream one, so even if he filtered me he would still receive
the things, as they would probably pass through other peers closer to him xD


Sincerely

--
Ivo Gandolfo

[Adam H. Kerman]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

>currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
>days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
>close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
>tik tok

Stop crying. Stop whining. Just fuck off already. If you block all
articles originating at news.eternal-september.org and that ends all of
your drama queen antics, then Usenet will be better off for it.

But you'll never do it because you are here only to cry, whine, and
complain.

Your behavior is utterly immature.

[immibis]

On 1/1/24 10:29, noel wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:
>

> currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
> days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
> close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
> tik tok

Tick Tock indeed. You know, that saying came from clocks before it came
from zoomer social media apps.

I recommend you hurry up and block it ASAP so you'll have to stop
responding to us "dumb cunts". The network will be better for it.

[immibis]

It's one heuristic of many. "Hi, I'm a troll, please peer with me so I
can't get blocked as easily." "Yes, sounds like a good idea, please peer
with me." - why should I trust your peering decisions?

[Sn!pe]

[nothing snipped]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 17:10:40 +0000, Sn!pe wrote:
>
> > immibis and I are ~not~ the same person; I had not met him before our
>

> My bad, no idea why I confused you for that wanker, please accept my
> sincere apologies.
>

Apology accepted, thank you.

>
> > Your bullying bluster says a great deal about you, noel. I will make no
>

> I have never walked on cotton wool.

>
> > Of course you won't read this
>

> yes I did :)

>
> > now kill-file me and be done with it. I will do likewise.
>

> Nope I dont use kill files, if someone is worth removing to me they are
> worth removing for everyone courtesy of dnews filter rules.
>
> The best thing about usenet is, no one forces anyone to read anything.
>

Quite so.

--
^Ï^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator

[Adam H. Kerman]

noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:

>On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 18:19:09 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>noel <delet...@invalid.lan> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 19:13:40 +0100, immibis wrote:
>>>>On 12/31/23 06:19, noel wrote:

>>>>>I have not blocked them at this point in time because they
>>>>>acknowledged and apologised.

>>>>>However, we block all google usenet, have done for months, so do you
>>>>>think I'd have any issue with blocking anyone else?

>>>>Google is widely blocked because it *only* contributes spam and
>>>>trolling, not because there's at least one troll on it. If there was
>>>>only one troll on Google, you'd just block that user.

>>>currently the support abuse@ holds 37 complaints on E-S within past 7
>>>days, so its not just one dumb cunt like you, theres 46 other wankers,
>>>close enough for me to justify dev nulling E-S if I so choose.
>>>tik tok

>>Stop crying. Stop whining. Just fuck off already. If you block all
>>articles originating at news.eternal-september.org and that ends all of
>>your drama queen antics, then Usenet will be better off for it.

>you still telling people i'm seamus adam, lol how fucking clueless you
>are.

>I make NO apologies for taking action that protects the masses, tough
>shit about collateral damage, I dont care, I dont block nntp ports if my
>users want to use someonewhere else, they are welcome to.

Ah. Your crying and whining is getting louder and louder and louder. The
masses you are protecting are sockpuppets yet to be created?

>>But you'll never do it because you are here only to cry, whine, and
>>complain.

>oh your hilarious... what have you been doing retard...

>>Your behavior is utterly immature.

>haha this from the cocksucking loser who used to enter into newsgroups
>abuse everyone then never appearing again, your history dates back to
>2001 here dickless, what a clueless coward you are.

I'm so confused as to how you read my article considering that you are
blocking everything from news.eternal-september.org.