Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

[email] Fw: Identifying Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace

0 views

Skip to first unread message

solit...@juno.com

unread,

Jul 9, 2002, 7:09:04 PM7/9/02

I know exactly who Sanford Wallace is. I don't give a shit who this Taylor asshole is, and have no idea why this twit decided to bless me with his endless rant about Wallace/Taylor/whoever. He appears to have harvested addys from the NANAE newsgroup, however.

One of the semi-regular posters in NANAE is in TX, I believe, but I'm sure he's not dumb enough to pull this shit without asking his friends if they're interested.

--
This address is used solely for USENET posting and related correspondence.
Harvesting this address from USENET for the purpose of sending unsolicited
commercial email constitutes tacit agreement to pay me $500 in handling fees per
message received.

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: bobL <0000...@no-id.com>

To: solit...@juno.com
Date: 9 Jul 2002 22:33:14 -0000
Subject: Identifying Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace

Message-ID: <4CGVXWUS374...@anonymous.poster>

Received: from mx6.boston.juno.com (mx6.boston.juno.com [64.136.24.38])
        by m10.boston.juno.com with SMTP id AAA8UY3EDA6MG3MJ
        for <solit...@juno.com> (sender <zn...@remailer.hotfire.net>);
        Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:32:35 -0400 (EST)

Received: from fe1.cox-internet.com (fe1-cox.cox-internet.com [66.76.2.38])
        by mx6.boston.juno.com with SMTP id AAA8UY3EDAZCG8UJ
        for <solit...@juno.com> (sender <zn...@remailer.hotfire.net>);
        Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:32:35 -0400 (EST)

Received: from Compaq ([208.180.144.16]) by fe1.cox-internet.com
          (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 201-232-137 license 8b8c7c02a6d7b485def54cb2fd930d8c)
          with SMTP id 20020709222828.XGYI13865.fe1@Compaq
          for <solit...@juno.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:28:28 -0500

Return-Path: <zn...@remailer.hotfire.net>

Comments: This message did not originate from the above address. It was
        automatically remailed by one or more anonymous mail services.
        This service is free. Please report problems or inappropriate
        use to the address below.
Message-ID: <4CGVXWUS374...@anonymous.poster>

"Just Taylor" IS Spamford Wallace. Taylor Jimenez is a false name,
a true alias. Just FYI. This guy is a creep and should not be
encouraged. The ONLY time he is ON-TOPIC and NOT in the process of
pursuing someone to stalk, harass, and/or abuse them is when the
topic is "Sanford Wallace". Only then is his pursue not controlling
others. He appears to like to speak for and defend Wallace and that
is the only person he cares about. Why? Because Sanford Wallace is
"Just Taylor" himself!! He cares ONLY about himself and is otherwise
engaged in Usenet ONLY in pursuit of others to harass, stalk and/or
abuse.

Here is information on the person known as 'Just Taylor' who stalks
people he does not know into newsgroups he does not participate in
to harass and defame people for others. He goes by a real alias.
There is NO "Taylor Jimenez" in California. He uses abuse domains
and always posts off the record to further try to hide and avoid
accountability. He is a triple anon coward. There is a Sanford
Wallace and he posts from the same area as "Taylor". "Taylor" uses
the same words (like 'larting'); behaves in the same way as Sanford;
uses some of Sanford's domains (which he claims he "bought from him");
and he is the very same age and looks exactly the same as Sanford
Wallace!! Sanford Wallace no longer lives at his past addresses and
there is a Sanford Wallace in San Pablo, CA. He lives in the same area
that would be served by the mail server "taylor" uses. "Taylor" also
retaliated for Sanford in ten different newsgroups where the "open
letter" (below) was posted. I wonder why he would do that???

In short it is clear that "Taylor" who is an irresponsible criminal-type
stalking and harassing abuser who tries to remain unaccountable and
anonymous is indeed Sanford "Spamford" Wallace.

See the http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/jimenez_wallace.htm page.
As you can see, UNLIKE "Taylor", his critics
go by my name and use a properly registered domain space
(registered in the name of the Jesness family for 6 years now) to host
his web pages. They are not cowards and a psychopathic type who is
anon and uses falsely registered domains, like "Taylor".

Here is more info to get you up-to-date on this disgusting person.
Quoting past posts in response to the apparent stalking and harassment
done BY Sanford Wallace.:

An Open Letter to Sanford Wallace!

Sanford, it is obvious that you have gone to some lengths to protect
your privacy. I respect a person's privacy. But, I question
whether a person who harasses and abuses people in newsgroups he
has never even participated in deserves to remain unaccountable. It is
also questionable whether a person who provides services to others
(hypocritical others) so they can harass people should remain
unaccountable, even if your own personal posting stops. These others
you perform services for have demanded (successfully) that the very
sort of activities you do for them not occur or cease. They officially
have considered activities like you do and facilitate "stalking and
harassment". (It is possible you do not even know this because
you do not know the interactions that have occurred in the newsgroup
you abuse for and now abuse in! Afterall you have provided services
for several years to a newsgroup you just recently have appeared in
ONLY to finally do your own off-topic spam, stalking and harassment.
You do not know the newsgroup just as you do not know the people you
abuse.)

Here's the deal. You, Sanford Wallace, cease and desist with ALL
activities stalking, harassing, and abusing people and cease all
activity that facilitates and encourages harassment of individuals
promptly and your privacy will continue to be respected. Simply do
NOTHING for the others you presently "serve" that THEY would not
label as inappropriate (to say the least) IF that was done against
them. It is pathetic to see a person on a power trip, where
he does things for others because he can get away with it. Again, you
may have not even been involved enough in any interactions with the
person you harass and with those in the newsgroup you "serve" to
know that all you do would officially and definitely be considered
wrong by many of those same hypocritical people you serve (AND
SUCH ACTIVITIES _HAVE BEEN_ DECLARED WRONG BY THESE VERY PEOPLE). True,
some of the people you "serve" (as basically a cheap big-shot punk)
are happy to see YOU do what they would not do themselves because
they do not want to be seen doing wrong, yet like it when you do it.
Hopefully, this is not enough pathetic gratification for you to
continue (esp. given there will be consequence and NOT the sort you
have been hoping for). (I know how you love court and like to win
when YOU have been a supreme asshole, but that wish may not be
forthcoming. This is your record and what makes you such a disgusting
punk for the whole world. This is why Harvard voted you one of the
worst people on the earth. There ARE other possible consequences --
and whoever told you that you are "smart" was very mistaken.)

If you decide that it is more important for you to throw your
"weight" around by doing favors for people to be a big shot (punk)
and if you continue acting against people you do not know and in
newsgroups you do not participate in, I believe that it will be
fair to do anything to make you have more accountability. This
will include revealing any and all identifying information about you.
Since you have gone to some lengths to seek privacy, I believe this
is something you might not want to occur.

Things have gone forward to the point that it is no longer helpful
to you to post through an abuse domain to do your Usenet posting and
it no longer helps that you go by an alias of a person that does
not even exist (as you yourself have admitted you do). You speak
often like a greedy materialistic man who has money and likes to
throw that around for his punk-ass power trips. But you also have
your family and your privacy to consider. I suggest you stop abusing
other people and continue to keep your privacy. No one wants to take
that away from you. But, you also would have to become accountable
by all means, if you continue your stalking and harassment of people
you do not even know, in newsgroups you do not even participate in.

You have facilitated and participated in harassing activities for
years. You can still get a free pass (believe it or not). But this
offer shall expire very shortly. I'll give you a week to correct
your activities and get your activities in line with the standards
that those you serve have insisted on.

AND

THE Sanford Wallace's History of Abuse

The Internet’s most notorious spammer, Sanford Wallace of Cyber
Promotions,
Inc., and other bulk e-mailers have been accused of spoofing addresses,
cloaking headers, and sending out millions of scattershot e-mails for
various
schlocky schemes and products. Now the evidence indicates that the
pathetic
abuser gets his "power trips" kicks from trying to control or extort
people
on Usenet to do what he says or what his friends say (SOooo _low_ has he
apparently sunk for 'power' and 'admiration'). Although (to gain
acceptance
and respectability) this jackass supposedly "turned against spammers"
*, he still
apparently loves to stretch the law and regulations and common sense
decency
_JUST_ to continue to practice ABUSE (or what even the majority of his
sick
supporters on Usenet would _AND HAVE_ labeled abuse). He does this to
people he does not know and for people he does not know. Just does what
he can
get away with for power and praise (from sick misguided others). SICK,
SICK,
SICK, SICHO, PSYCHOPATH.

NO ONE SHOULD EVER CONSIDER DOING BUSINESS WITH SANFORD WALLACE!!! He
is not
a decent person. Let him live off the money he already made through
his disgusting "business" activities and let him rot in hell. He will go
broke and the fat slimeball will go to hell. He is fat, ugly, and
useless.

A bit of the abuser's pathetic history is in order: Quoting
http://www.phillipsnizer.com/int-art37.htm:

"CompuServe Incorporated v. Cyber Promotions, Inc and Sanford Wallace. ,
Case No. C2-96-1070 (S.D. Ohio, Feb. 3, 1997)(Graham, J.) In this case,
the
court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants, inter alia,
from
sending unsolicited advertisements via e-mail to any CompuServe
subscriber.
Defendants are engaged in the business of sending unsolicited "junk e-
mail"
to users. On the net, this practice is referred to as "spamming."
Amongst
others, defendants sent their advertisements to subscribers of
CompuServe.
To effectuate such communications, defendants utilized CompuServe's
computer
network, where the unsolicited e-mail was stored, and the subscriber
informed
of its arrival. Subscribers thereafter had the ability to access this
mail.
Numerous subscribers complained that they did not want to receive this
e-mail. As a result, and because the volume of e-mail sent by defendants
placed a significant burden on plaintiff's computer equipment (which has
a finite processing and storage capacity), CompuServe demanded that
defendants stop sending any further e-mail. CompuServe also took
technological steps to prevent defendants' e-mail from reaching its
clientele. Defendants refused to voluntarily cease sending the e-mail,
and took steps to evade the technological blocks CompuServe had put in
place. As a result, CompuServe commenced suit, seeking, inter alia,
injunctive relief to prevent defendants from sending any further
unsolicited e-mail. The court held that defendants' conduct constituted
the tort of trespass to personal property or chattels. [snip] ...

..the court stated: "To the extent that defendants' multitudinous
electronic mailings demand the disk space and drain the processing power
of plaintiff's computer equipment, those resources are not available to
serve CompuServe subscribers. Therefore, the value of that equipment to
CompuServe is diminished ...". The court further held that the
requirements
of section 218(d) were met by the injury to CompuServe's goodwill and
reputation to with its subscribers, who objected to the receipt of
unsolicited e-mail. ." (source: http://www.phillipsnizer.com/int-
art37.htm)
(end quote)

In short:
The court also rejected Cyber's claims that CompuServe's decision to
connect to the Internet was an implied invitation to the public to enter
its property for business purposes. The court held that CompuServe's
demand, in October 1995, that Cyber cease the e-mailings was sufficient
withdrawal of any implied invitation. Also:

Other cases brought against Cyber and its president, Sanford Wallace by
Internet service providers have produced similar results. In Concentric
Network Corp. v Wallace, the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California granted Concentric Network (CNC) a permanent
injunction prohibiting Cyber from 1) sending unsolicited e-mail to CNC
subscribers; 2) sending or receiving e-mail via CNC; 3) misrepresenting
that any Cyber e-mail message was sent from or condoned by CNC; and 4)
distributing mailing lists containing the e-mail addresses of CNC
subscribers. In EarthLink v. Cyber Promotions, Inc., the
Los Angeles Superior Court granted EarthLink an injunction prohibiting
Cyber from sending unsolicited e-mail to EarthLink subscribers. The
court determined that Cyber's actions constituted trespass to
EarthLink's
computer systems. (sourse: http://www.info-law.com/lost.html)

*Footnote: SW apparently has not even been able to curb his psychopathic
tendencies to stop spamming (in one way or another). Although he uses
SEVERAL email addresses and posting services, some of his names and
email addresses appear on over *** 70 *** Usenet spam reports!! He is
simply a sick psycho. Whatever spam he no longer engages in is likely
JUST because in recent court case(s), he has been prohibited BY LAW from
continuing his activity.

Regarding this, quoting another source speaking about the
outcome of the case between Spamford and Earthlink: ...
"The decision also prohibits Cyber Promotions and its founder, Sanford
Wallace,
from engaging in a comprehensive list of spam-related activities in the
future." In addition to the $2 million settlement, EarthLink said
Wallace
agreed to be held personally liable for $1 million if he sends spam to
EarthLink members or enables anyone else to spam them. Wallace also
will be
held liable if he violates a number of other restrictions, including
distribution of EarthLink member e-mail addresses.

Since last year, Cyber Promotions has lost legal battles with America
Online
and Bigfoot, a company that provides e-mail addresses.

Cyber Promotions has virtually been out of business since October
when Agis, its backbone Internet service provider, terminated Cyber
Promotions' connection. "
(source: http://money.cnn.com/1998/03/30/technology/earthlink/)

IN SHORT, SANFORD WALLACE IS A WORTHLESS PATHETIC LOSER, who can kiss my
ass. HIS RECENT ACTIVITIES JUST SHOW HIM TO BE A WORSE LOSER THAN ANYONE
WOULD HAVE EXPECTED. MANY WHO THOUGHT SANFORD HAD SOME INTELLECTUAL
CAPACITY NOW SEE HIM AS A PSYCHOPATHIC MORON.

NOW Why Sanford Wallace quit email spam!!:

ONLY ONE REASON: _NOT_ BECAUSE HE IS REFORMED!! **HE IS PROHIBITED BY A
COURT FROM DOING EMAIL SPAM.*** THIS IS THE ONLY REASON THE UNREFORMED
ABUSER HIDES AND ABUSES SECRETLY AND DOES NOT DO EMAIL SPAM. HE STILL
IS AN ABUSER AND A SPAMMER OF SORTS AND HE IS A LOSER PSYCHOPATH WHO
CANNOT
KEEP FROM ABUSING PEOPLE.

SW apparently has not even been able to curb his psychopathic
tendencies to stop spamming (in one way or another). Although he uses
SEVERAL email addresses and posting services, some of his names and
email addresses appear on over *** 70 *** Usenet spam reports!! He is
simply a sick psycho. Whatever spam he no longer engages in is likely
JUST because in recent court case(s), he has been prohibited BY LAW from
continuing his activity.

Since last year, Cyber Promotions has lost legal battles with America
Online
and Bigfoot, a company that provides e-mail addresses.

P.S. The reason you never see "Just Taylor" quoted directly in the
groups.google.com archive is because he ALWAYS posts x-no-archive.
He does this because he tries to remain off the record to hide and
be unaccountable for his hoodlum actions.
That is why what he posts is seen ONLY through others who quote him,
when you do a google search. Still you can see him defending and
speaking for Sanford Wallace even recently (YET MORE evidence that
"Taylor" is indeed Sanford Wallace)!!! To wit:

Go to http://groups.google.com and do an advanced search with the
Message ID <adovba$sam$1...@calcite.rhyolite.com> and with the

Message ID <997.3cffc831.ce98a@biskybox>

AND <3CDC6E97...@clifto.com>

AND, in 1998 there is adefense of Sanford Walace BY "Taylor Netscum",
aka "Just Taylor" aka "Taylor Jimenez" (tay...@wilhelp.com)!:

<34c082e3...@news.mindspring.com>#1/1

PLUS

And, for just SOME of the direct evidence you can see to prove to
yourself that "Taylor" is Sanford Wallace, see:

<a1en7uo2k6jf60pat...@4ax.com>

AND

<213268cd7a376090...@remailer.segfault.net>

That is just SOME of the evidence (all verifiable).

AND see:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1020228234239.
26208A-100000%40halifax.chebucto.ns.ca&output=gplain

(ignore irrelevant portions -- just look at the evidence!!)

Also see:

<a1en7uo2k6jf60pat...@4ax.com>

<may106-1305...@js2.arl.psu.edu>#1/1

<1997052519...@fat.doobie.com>#1/1

<5sg3kg$l...@garcia.efn.org>#1/1

<MPG.e11ef4dd...@news.cris.com>#1/1

<5kvf16$l...@web.nmti.com>#1/1

<3383a9ce.166056576@rabendary>#1/1

<5ld072$d...@news-central.tiac.net>#1/1

It should also be noted that Sanford Wallace made posts MUCH like
"Taylor Jimenez" does. (He disappears then 'Taylor' appears.)

Some of the Sanford posts have recently been deleted to hide this
evidence.

Also Sanford has hatred for gays, JUST like "Taylor". See:

<telecom...@telecom-digest.org>#1/1 OR

<5k2tbm$b7r$1...@bigdog.eli.net>#1/1

In interviews Sanford denied having any link to this page, showing him
to be a liar -- AGAIN, *JUST LIKE* "Taylor" !!!

Both "Taylor" and Sanford have also shown interest in military
newsgroups (I will let you do your own research there!!)

---------------------------------------------

07/09/02 19:02:32 IP block 208.180.144.16
Trying 208.180.144.16 at ARIN
Trying 208.180.144 at ARIN
TCA Internet (NETBLK-NETBLK-TCAC-1)
   P.O. Box 131375
   Tyler, TX 75713-1375
   US

   Netname: NETBLK-TCAC-1
   Netblock: 208.180.0.0 - 208.180.255.255
   Maintainer: TCAC

   Coordinator:
      TCA Internet (ZT14-ARIN) dnsho...@tyler.net
      903-939-7200

Domain System inverse mapping provided by:

ROSE.TYLER.NET 205.218.118.1
NS.TCA.NET 208.180.0.2

ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE

Record last updated on 14-May-2002.
Database last updated on 8-Jul-2002 20:01:39 EDT.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 new messages