Spamhaus Ref: SBL87209

[Martin Nicholas]

This Advisory:
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL87209
contains the following sweeping generalisation:
"It is our considered opinion that nothing of any merit emanates from
this block. Large parts of Romania appear to be in Nevada and much of
it is snowshoe spam."

I can assure them that to my certain knowledge this is incorrect. One
of my servers lies within this range - it sends virtually no mail,
save for a few SPAM reports to admins. It is located in Cluj-Napoca -
that's Cluj-Napoca in Romaina, not Cluj-Napoca in Nevada.

There is a silver lining to this as my reports are producing some
exciting new RFCI submissions.

I look forward to the return of accuracy as a priority to the SBL.

--
Comments posted to news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting
are solely the responsibility of their author. Please
read the news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting FAQ at
http://www.blocklisting.com/faq.html before posting.

[stinky]

In article
<2b2921b5-f272-4493...@t23g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>,
Martin Nicholas <martin9...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This Advisory:
> http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL87209
> contains the following sweeping generalisation:
> "It is our considered opinion that nothing of any merit emanates from
> this block. Large parts of Romania appear to be in Nevada and much of
> it is snowshoe spam."
>
> I can assure them that to my certain knowledge this is incorrect. One
> of my servers lies within this range - it sends virtually no mail,
> save for a few SPAM reports to admins. It is located in Cluj-Napoca -
> that's Cluj-Napoca in Romaina, not Cluj-Napoca in Nevada.
>
> There is a silver lining to this as my reports are producing some
> exciting new RFCI submissions.
>
> I look forward to the return of accuracy as a priority to the SBL.

If you are expecting a reply from Spamhaus please realize they don't
reply, or possibly even read this newsgroup.