BACKSCATTERER Express De-listing didn't work
Scotch
If any of the people at backscatterer read this I would really
appreciate a reply. I have inherited a mail server which was sending
backscatter, and we were listed. The problem has been resolved and
tested so we paid for an express delisting. The backscatterer website
said that our delisting was in progress, then after an hour or so, it
shows us as listed again, but the dates etc have not changed... how
can this be?? Our last "offence" was days ago according to
backscatterer. Meanwhile the mail queues with legit messages grow...
Any reply would be appreciated.
--
Comments posted to news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting
are solely the responsibility of their author. Please
read the news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting FAQ at
http://www.blocklisting.com/faq.html before posting.
E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
> I have inherited a mail server which was sending backscatter,
> and we were listed.
> The problem has been resolved and tested so we paid for
> an express delisting.
> The backscatterer website said that our delisting was
> in progress, then after an hour or so, it shows us as
> listed again, but the dates etc have not changed...
> how can this be??
> Our last "offence" was days ago according to backscatterer.
> Meanwhile the mail queues with legit messages grow...
Really? Just how many messages is your server sending
with postmaster@ or null sender <>?
That are "legit messages" and not backsctter?
--
E-Mail Sent to this address <Blac...@Anitech-Systems.com>
will be added to the BlackLists.
Scotch
tweaking guys.
Rob
> Forget it, it seems we are now delisted. Your website could use some
> tweaking guys.
No need to tell them that quality can be improved.
They are proud of what they have, and they refuse to see problems.
Claus v. Wolfhausen
>
>Scotch <scotti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Forget it, it seems we are now delisted. Your website could use some
>> tweaking guys.
>
>No need to tell them that quality can be improved.
>They are proud of what they have, and they refuse to see problems.
Oh i see an issue that also Shmuel told here:
Listings are way to short and Expressdelisting is too cheap.
Unfortunatley i work here - i do not own the company.
Im my personal opinion listees could rott at least a full year in the blocklist
for sending just one NDR to an invalid address here or for a single verify
call.
I will have to discuss with my boss if i can do some improvement to the policy.
If i get his okay then it is possible that Shmuel will find it cool, but you
and other backscatterers might not be happy with the changes :-)
--
Claus von Wolfhausen
Technical Director
UCEPROTECT-Network
http://www.uceprotect.net
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
at 11:05 AM, Rob <nom...@example.com> said:
>They are proud of what they have, and they refuse to see problems.
PKB. I have problems with what they are do, but they are minor issues that
do not affect legitimacy. You, OTOH, are spamming. Chanting "Spamming is
what I don't do" does not make the misuse of MAIL as an illicit VRFY any
less abusive.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to spam...@library.lspace.org