by Ian Millhiser-VOX- May 28, 2026
Justice Brett Kavanaugh is a Republican. He served in a Republican White House, typically votes with the Court’s other Republicans, and even sometimes
sides with President Donald Trump in major cases that divide the Republican Party. He’s not the sort of person you’d expect to carry a torch for a liberal cause for nearly four full decades.
But, well, he did. In Kavanaugh’s majority opinion in
Pitchford v. Cain, which was handed down on Thursday, the justice more or less implemented a proposal for how to prevent racism from infecting jury selection that he
first proposed in a 1989 piece that he published when he was still a law student.
To be clear, Kavanaugh’s
Pitchford opinion doesn’t really break much new ground. It involves a straightforward violation of
Batson v. Kentucky (1986), the Supreme Court’s most important precedent governing race in jury selection, and rules in favor of the person on death row who brought this fairly clear-cut violation to the Supreme Court’s attention.
Still,
Pitchford was a 5-4 decision, with four of Kavanaugh’s fellow Republicans joining a dissent by Justice Neil Gorsuch. So the decision could have easily come down the other way if one of the Republican justices hadn’t developed a liberal approach to
Batson before he started his legal career. Sometimes, even Supreme Court justices — arguably the most highly vetted political appointees in the entire federal government — contain multitudes.
Full at:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/brett-kavanaugh-just-won-a-surprising-victory-for-racial-justice/ar-AA24ieKC