Re: [New World Network] Alien Landings - Reality Games

0 views
Skip to first unread message

mich...@igc.org

unread,
Aug 1, 2008, 2:40:24 PM8/1/08
to new-worl...@googlegroups.com
John and Starseed Family,

Your query is reminiscent of a passage from the book 1491, in which native "Americans" did not recognize European sailing ships as they lay anchored off the Virginia coast because they had no such things in their cognitive categories. Or consider that some northern tribes have something approaching 32 different terms for snow. Or try this on: some southern Pacific peoples have no category for the color "green" within their lexicons.

Denial, or perhaps better said, unknowing, runs deep, and what do we do with evidence that is temporarily beyond our agreed upon knowing? Here in the Bay Area, I often look up in the night skies, and, despite the intense light pollution, can see evidence of federation spacecraft hovering in asynchronistic orbit. Their look, feel and light patterns are as unique as planets are within our solar system from say our sun or other distant star clusters. What is more, certain classes of ships emit entirely different patterns and colors of light than do others.

Your question is this: Now that some of us know that its 1491, what next?

For those of us who are here as emissaries, as bridges, we open our hearts to those who are arriving to assist in earth's Divine ascension. We hold the field for a kind of etheric conversation to emerge, one in which those ready to anchor the vibration of love feel ready to choose active transformation that is intergalactically cogruent with the ascending earth.

Where there is light there is also shadow. My experience is that each of us must choose wholeness over separation, radical inclusion over polarity. What this means for me is that we must come to terms with our having once served the light and the dark, and make radical choices about reconciling what lies ahead. Free will is one of the basic axioms and laws of the universe and each of us serving on galactic earth will have a choice about whether to remain embodies in 3-D, or to ascend into 4-D, 5-D or beyond, as frankly speaking, no one yet grasps how far the Divine earth wishes to morph her/himself.

I don't have a plan for dark ones arriving and playing out a kind of war-of-the-worlds scenario. I do know that it will be up to some of us to begin interacting with those representing the light and the dark on behalf of humanity and the earth plane. Some of us are here as cosmic emissaries, intergalactic deciples of love, to anchor in compassion over fear, connection over separation. And yes, I know that separation and fear are the common currencies of this particular Republic.

I have daily close encounters of the third kind with intergallactic beings, whether or not I can actually "see" them or recall our having journeyed together on or off planet. The most crucial step for me is to remain anchord in my heart and to step into my full power as an unlimited and multidimensional being. The rest will be, in its own way, a cakewalk.

It's 1491. What do each of us want to make of our lives? Are we willing to breathe through fear and into each of our respectice Divine Lights? Are we each able to acknowledge and honor our respective shadows?

I want to believe that I will honor being in and of service to Divine Light, because I know, that starlight is all that the imaginary personna called Michael consists of . . .

Love,

Michael

-----Original Message-----
>From: John <jo...@whisperzone.org>
>Sent: Jul 31, 2008 7:31 AM
>To: New World Network <new-worl...@googlegroups.com>
>Subject: [New World Network] Alien Landings - Reality Games
>
>In celebration of the upcoming release of the remake of "The Day the Earth
>Stood Still," and in recognition of last night's show on History Channel
>addressing government [non-]policies dealing with sightings of UFOs and/or
>possible landings/crashes of starcraft, let's play a reality game.
>
>Assume there is life beyond that we know on this world (many of you do
>anyway), and that you are a believer it exists.
>
>Assume also some of that life is of not only higher intelligence, but also
>higher intent, concerned only with uplifting all creation and assisting us
>with our evolutionary journey.
>
>Assume, too, that some of it is not, and is only concerned with its own
>interests, even when that means dominating or annihilating other life forms
>(like us).
>
>Now assume that UFOs are not only spotted in our skies in ways that no one
>can deny, but also openly land in populated areas. No one knows their
>intentions, much like when the saucer landed in "The Day the Earth Stood
>Still."
>
>Curiosity abounds. Fear grows. Panic spreads. Public safety forces are
>called. The military is there, too, with the rest of their forces placed on
>high alert.
>
>What is your role, or that of your extended community of believers?
>
>Do you try to engage a public/media/government that doesn't know how to
>respond? If so, then how? Or do you just sit back thinking to yourself, "I
>told you so?"
>
>How would you recommend we as a species deal with both possibilities (friend
>or foe)?
>
>In hindsight, as a believer what preparations would you suggest might be
>undertaken to ready ourselves for such an event? Would you have
>prepared/trained public officials and crisis response teams? If so, how?
>
>Would you have tried to facilitate communications/interaction with the star
>beings before any such possibility occurred? If so, how would you do so in
>the face of an unbelieving public/media/government? How would you establish
>an effective network or infrastructure to deal with such events?
>
>Finally, what if you did all that and you were wrong. The bad guys showed
>up?
>
>Please share your answers. They are important to the future of us all.
>
>
>
>john
>
>>

John

unread,
Aug 2, 2008, 9:47:28 PM8/2/08
to new-worl...@googlegroups.com
Ok, let me play too.

First, I envision having a group of public faces ready to trot out before the cameras to serve as talking heads on the talk shows.  Much the way the political parties do now on both sides of an issue.  Prepped with talking points and ready to go.

This would mean having a cadre of publicists with connections to the network/cable news shows, who are able to get our spokesmen on the air to be heard.

The first point is to maintain the peace, and address the fear and uncertainty.  The second would probably be to point to the problems in our world, and why we could use help from beyond.  Third, of course, it to provide specific things people can do to participate in the process, empowering them to participate in how things play out.

While we could say we "know" they're the good guys, that would probably not play well.  Rather, we should suggest ways to interact with them to ascertain their intentions (from a public perspective).

Now, if they were foes and not friends, we would need to have already had contact with those who were and received assurances of their assistance and protection, including  how they would recommend we meet such an attack.

These of course would provide talking points of their own.

It would  help if we had various councils already in place, ready to govern and provide for people's needs if interruptions in food/water/utilities were met by FEMA's demonstrated inability to timel deliver prompt and efficient governmental assistance.  If not centrally coordinated, at least fully communicating with each other.  Therefore our own means of communication (satellite  phone?  short wave?  CB?  Web/email?  Telepathy?) should already be in place.

Perhaps safe zones could be established as well for orderly evacuation where needed.

And of course, a plan of how to deal with the inevitable marshal law and military response, including a provisional government with resistance teams already contemplated. 

All of this should be planned and accomplished from a standpoint of peaceful engagement of the existing order, working in a non-threatening manner within established channels of government and media so as to not arouse suspicion or response against us.  It is important that they see us as part of their team, spreading calm, and not adversaries to be suppressed.

If there are those who can act as intermediaries for communications, then we should have some at hand ready to step up, some to interact with the public, others with appropriate governmental, scientific, and other appropriate communities.  This probably entails having a large number of channels already trained and prepositioned and ready to go.

Of course, if the Network is in place before that, we could already have much of this in place and ready to go.  Communicating openly, not only with us but with the public and necessary infrastructure and services about ways we can interact together, and perhaps already having done so, so that their appearance comes not out of the blue but as a matter of invitation.

Transparency must be the byword in such matters.  Credibility would be an issue for those who don't believe, and their disbelief addressed head-on in a loving, gentle and irresistible way.

These are just a few of the ideas I'm kicking around here on a Saturday night, watching Bruce Willis kicking butt on the tube and allowing all this to flow.  You probably understand where it's coming from.

In short, this reality game is an invitation to begin preparing for what many consider an inevitable situation.  There are  many reasons to come together in community, and connect them through the hub.  This one is as good as any.


john







mich...@igc.org

unread,
Aug 4, 2008, 12:44:58 AM8/4/08
to new-worl...@googlegroups.com
John and family,

Very useful and pragmatic response. I probably don't have the energy to comment on your reflections this evening, but I did have a telling conversation with a trusted sister this morning about alien matters.

A number of years ago, in a deep meditative state, she got that the planet would be approached by aliens bearing extraordinary gifts. Apropos of the faustian tradition, however, these "gifts" would come at a significant price; in effect extending the current "dream of the planet," subjegation and all, to further benefit unstated others.

She cautioned me to go into my heart in this and all such matters, to wed love with truth. The only way of authenticating guests bearing gifts was, she believed, from a deep=seated knowing within the heart. If something didn't feel right, then regardless of how desirable it appeared to be on the surface, then it should be guarded against and spoken of with great caution and discernment. If I didn't know why it couldn't resonate or ring true, they another might have the much needed information.

Any way that we slice it, we ain't necessarily looking at a cakewalk here.

Blessings, Love and Divine Light,

Michael

-----Original Message-----
>From: John <jo...@whisperzone.org>

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages