Rick Rey
unread,Feb 16, 2009, 4:28:08 PM2/16/09Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to New Media West
Thanks for laying this out, Rudy.
Another issue I want to bring up is the process of getting a project
approved by SAG, which goes beyond the contract. If you have a
distribution agreement in place, or are offered one in the future, SAG
must approve your deal before signing off on the project. They are
fearful that producers will make bad deals, which will ultimately
prevent them from paying performers (residuals are based on
distributor gross, not producer earnings). I understand the sentiment
of wanting to protect actors (and producers) from bad deals, but I
don't think it's necessarily SAG's responsibility or right to do so.
If a producer makes a bad deal, it's still on him/her to fulfill the
terms of the SAG agreement. This practice may also discourage networks
and other content providers from working with union-friendly projects,
because it obligates them to track "to the penny" all distributor
revenue from all videos written under the contract, and of course
disclose that information on a regular basis.