Five years of Takshashila: Nitin's blog post today (fwd)

[Rakhal DAVE]

Nitin Pai on experiences with starting and running Takshashila:
http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/category/provocations/

In case you want to know more about Takshashila:
http://takshashila.org.in/

-Rakhal

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nitin Pai <niti...@takshashila.org.in>
Date: 13 July 2015 at 07:47
Subject: How we run Takshashila
To: Nitin Pai <niti...@takshashila.org.in>


Where there is no party line
by Nitin Pai <http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/author/nitin/> on 13TH JULY
2015 in PROVOCATIONS
<http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/category/provocations/>, THINK TANK
<http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/category/think-tank/>

*Think tanking in the age of extreme partisanship*

One reason there has been a fall (okay, precipitous fall) in the frequency
of posts on this blog is that the day-to-day challenges of building an
upstart think tank drain one’s time and energy. Another is laziness,
lethargy and procrastination. Yet another is twitter, which is still the
path of least resistance for the current of thought to reach the ground of
public discourse. Laziness and twitter are easy to understand reasons, but
what is this business of building a think tank? Almost five years since the
first stamp paper was stamped at a registrar’s office in Chennai, it might
be a good time to share some thoughts and experiences to deter other
thoughtful, unsuspecting souls from attempting something similar.

This post is written with the intent of being the first in a series. But
just like how N is initially unknown in a 1/N series of tweets, it is by no
means certain that this series will be any longer than this first post.
With that disclaimer, let us look at two of our core values: funding, and
independence & non-partisanship.

From the outset, Takshashila’s founders decided that the organisation, a
non-profit public charitable trust, will operate solely on Indian money.
After all, it would be ironic for an ambition that reads “building the
intellectual foundations of an India with global interests” to be financed
with foreign donations. Also, foreign funding would hand detractors and
opponents of our ideas a convenient handle to deliberately mischaracterise
our public policy arguments as playing to a foreign agenda. Since many of
the arguments that we make ruthlessly in the national interest are
counter-intuitive, they are vulnerable to smear campaigns. Imagine arguing (as
we have done
<http://takshashila.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TDD-DefenceFDI-SKS-20100414.pdf>)
for 100% FDI in defence production with an unconditional, unrelated grant
from a respected foreign foundation. The elimination of foreign funding has
made life a lot more tougher than it could have been, but since we are set
for the long haul, it is a price we have happily paid.

Maintaining independence and non-partisanship the other hard challenge, and
one we’ve managed to address quite well. First, while it is relatively easy
to manage an organisation (a private corporation, an association or a
political party) that has an official view that everyone must fall in line
with (or leave), it is much more difficult to manage one that doesn’t. A
think tank and a public policy school cannot function effectively unless
its members have full intellectual freedom. Yet when this freedom causes a
diversity of opinions to be expressed, there is often a internal tension
among those supporting different positions, and an external confusion as to
whether the institution supports one or the other view. The one on whose
shoulders falls the job of managing the institution, yours truly’s in this
case, has to act as a mediator, negotiating platform and conciliator
internally, and an official disclaimer-issuer and ‘brand manager’
externally. This is not easy. Worse, in a small start-up institution like
ours, there is always the possibility that my own views–and those of the
other co-founders–are conflated with that of the organisation’s, which
sometimes leads to pulled punches, less trenchant blog posts and blander
language in newspaper columns.

Since 2010, public discourse in India has become edgy, sharply divisive and
polarised. Everyone is quick to paint an unfamiliar or unsavoury opinion as
an attack on one’s favoured politician or party. The political campaigns of
the 2014 general election had massive online components, and online
political entrepreneurs seeking to gain political prominence and spoils of
power by attacking ‘the other side’. So Takshashila was on Congress payroll
for the BJP’s vociferous online partisans (who we endearingly call “the
wrong wing”), an RSS front for the Congress’s beleaguered but spirited
online brigade and pro-corruption for Anna Hazare & Arvind Kejriwal
supporters. The Communists somehow forgot to attack us, which is perhaps an
indication of their irrelevance, or ours. Kabira had gone to the bazaar to
ask for everyone’s well-being, but ended up being attacked by them all.
There is a lesson in this which we took and we teach.

Another interesting phenomenon was that those who donated to us—including
Rohini Nilekani, our biggest donor—did not once even hint what positions
Takshashila should or shouldn’t take. But those who didn’t give us any
money often vociferously insisted what political positions we should take
for our own good. It is now not too hard to detect political partisans
pretending to be broad-minded philanthropists. It is also heartening that
there are enough of the latter to lend their support to us, in big or small
ways.

I have always found the allegation “you are saying this because XYZ is your
donor” an indication of the person making the allegation projecting his own
values on his target. As acts of honour and integrity even in today’s
famously compromised media industry show, not everyone who draws a pay
cheque necessarily dances to the tunes of the owners or donors. For small
startups like ours, with low stakes, it is relatively inexpensive to be
independent and non-partisan and call things as we see them. Judgement
calls on the safety of our members and their families apart, there is
little to make us toe anyone’s line. So we merrily advocate what we see as
the national interest, and we try to persuade others to see things our way.

This does not mean that we are “neutral”. Our ideological leanings are
openly advertised: freedom, a culture of tolerance, an open society and
strengthening India’s national power. These set of ideas can be called
“liberal nationalism”, but it is the values that matter, not the label.

It’s not enough to be and act independently and in a non-partisan manner.
It is important to be perceived as such by the people we are trying to
persuade. That was a problem I had no good solution for until the good Jay
Panda, BJD MP from Odisha, gave me an idea from his own experience: set up
a Ombudsman with a mandate to deal with complaints regarding these values.
The Ombudsman can also solicit informal and formal feedback if he deems
necessary. So we instituted a powerfulOmbudsman
<http://takshashila.org.in/about/ombudsman/>—a trustee with no role in
management—who anyone can directly write to. It’s early days yet, but this
does appear a good process to manage the tensions that arise from an
organisation whose members are making forceful arguments in a politicised
public discourse. In our view, “non-partisanship does not mean
non-engagement. On the contrary, Takshashila’s policy remains to engage
with all political parties while remaining firmly independent of them. We
believe that engagement with the political process is an important aspect
in achieving public outcomes in a democracy.”

The biggest asset Takshashila has today is the goodwill of its supporters
and the credibility among a small section of India’s elite. Our success
will continue to come from this, hopefully growing constituency.