Thanks Zaid!
I can't recall specifically complaining about URI resolution, but that's
not to say I didn't.
The general theme of my technical recommendations have been centered
around problems with the existing RDF export (for example, at least two
URIs for each concept, with different properties attached to each,
requiring some kind of merge), and the lack of a better alternative
means of exporting the whole database.
It looks like the contents of this service are something like a SPARQL
DESCRIBE or a parent traversal -- but any issues with the underlying RDF
will be inherited here
So in answer to your question, afraid it's not of immediate use to me,
but could be v useful to others!
I actually have my own framework for working with nlx, will post
shortly.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "neurolex" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
neurolex+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.