On Nov 22, 2020, at 4:33 AM, Ricardo Julião <rsju...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, i want to know if there is a anarchy model alweary done in Net Logo.
ty --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netlogo-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netlogo-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/57a43355-577f-4a74-b4b7-d19b75c828c6n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/fa68afa9-8ae9-4b12-94c1-bd6f4cfded78n%40googlegroups.com.
On Nov 22, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Jhnib <joesh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Michael Tamillow - If you don't have any advice or an answer to a question, then please refrain from posting things that are unwelcoming or can be interpreted as aggressive, especially that you mostly posted your own opinion and not some empirical evidence that your view is correct.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/fa68afa9-8ae9-4b12-94c1-bd6f4cfded78n%40googlegroups.com.
answer: Many of the same canonical complex systems models in Netlogo demonstrate leaderless organization. Traffiic jams, flocking, ant foraging etc. Here, we could say the model is a model of Anarchy regardless of the phase that the model is in. It's more about the logic of the model where organization emerges through the interactions of the agents and not designed in with prescribed hierarchy.
definition 3:
Voluntary association and cooperation. Rejecting subjugation through violence, force, or other coercion.
answer: If requests to change state between agents is done with the ASK and the agent has context-sensitive rules on executing the command, I would say that model has an Anarchist governance model. Somewhere around Netlogo ver 3 or 4, the preferred pattern was to use ASK. Prior to this, the pattern was agents would directly change the state of another agent. commanded with no choice. That is now considered bad form in ABM and not adhering to the Anarchist Cookbook :-) This is also along the lines of Pattie Maes clever definition: "an agent is a software object that can say no". In my research right now with emergency management and Defense, I am thinking about how a firefighter in a in an incident command team hierarchy with command and control, are encouraged to refuse orders for many context-sensitive reasons. I would call incident command in wildfire Anarchical under this definition. https://www.nwcg.gov/committee/6mfs/refusing-risk.Contrast that with the military where a soldier can only refuse an order if its illegal. There is related ideas with respect to Mission vs Detailed Command and Control where the former is decentralized and the latter centralized.
definition 4: Rejection of the State as Authority.
answer: A Netlogo model would be Anarchic if the agents exercising authority, emergent or explicit were labeled as such. So imagine having different agents of legal status (State, Corporation, Natural Person) and then calling the model Anarchic if the State was not involved in the authority hierarchy. This is the least interesting example to me.
Hope that helps. As I am not a domain expert in Anarchism in its different forms or even Political Science in general, I would welcome any feedback as I am working on a paper around this.
-Stephen
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/fa68afa9-8ae9-4b12-94c1-bd6f4cfded78n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/2359DD8C-AB98-4184-83AF-D15653CEB577%40gmail.com.
-- Dale Frakes Adjunct Instructor, PhD Candidate PSU Systems Science dfr...@pdx.edu - http://web.pdx.edu/~dfrakes/
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/0bdd19cc-503e-b19f-2285-2facdbeb8162%40pdx.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/9E2EB0A9-C281-4150-B237-4E482F096FD4%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/9E2EB0A9-C281-4150-B237-4E482F096FD4%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/CANOZKcjFY54CXfU99wHhunj3WCMkoUZsfUaEhqDracnZMkHkWQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for your interest in NetLogo modeling.
For item 1) if you want the maximum x value on a plot using auto-scaling to be an integer, you can edit the plot and put the line
set-plot-x-range plot-x-min ceiling plot-x-max
in the Plot update commands section.
Y values can be controlled in similar fashion.
As far as item 2) is concerned NetLogo provides only a basic plotting capability with the assumption that users can use other programs with their data to produce more sophisticated plots. You have made good case for how some features would be helpful to new users. However I don’t think such enhancements will be available in the near future.
Here is one way to make tick-like marks every 10 ticks
edit the plot
Add a new pen
Change the color if desired by clicking on the color square, selecting a color from the palette that opens and clicking OK
put the following line in the pen’s Plot update commands section section:
if ticks mod 10 = 0 [ plot-pen-up plotxy ticks 0 plot-pen-down plotxy ticks plot-y-max / 50 ]
You can adjust the spacing and height of the “ticks” by changing the numbers 10 and 50.
This code is based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20988126/how-to-plot-a-vertical-line-every-x-step-in-netlogo by Stephen Guerin
One explanation for why the minimum and maximum values numbers are offset from their actual locations is that the lowest coordinates on the y and y axes would otherwise collide (given the layout), and that the maximum values are similarly constrained to lie within the physical plot range.
I hope this is helpful, and let the list know if you have further questions.
Aaron
--
Aaron Brandes, Software Developer
Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling
From: <netlog...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of "Paolo Gaudiano (Aleria)" <pa...@aleria.tech>
Date: Sunday, November 29, 2020 at 9:27 AM
To: netlogo-users <netlog...@googlegroups.com>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netlogo-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
netlogo-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-users/etPan.5fc3afb6.2b820001.6396%40aleria.tech.