Comment on revision r23 in amx-netlinx-common

[amx-netli...@googlecode.com]

kim.john.burgess commented on revision r23 in project amx-netlinx-common.
Details are at
http://code.google.com/p/amx-netlinx-common/source/detail?r=23

Score: Positive

General Comment:
What was breaking when the program_name statements were omitted?

I'm for keeping them in, but I'm just curious as I couldn't get the
compiler to squeal when I left them out.

Also, should they be moved to be within the compiler conditional so that if
the include is added to a project multiple times everything still plays
nice?

Respond to these comments at
http://code.google.com/p/amx-netlinx-common/source/detail?r=23
--
You received this message because you starred this review, or because
your project has directed all notifications to a mailing list that you
subscribe to.
You may adjust your review notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings