Comment on revision r23 in amx-netlinx-common

2 views
Skip to first unread message

amx-netli...@googlecode.com

unread,
May 12, 2010, 6:40:47 PM5/12/10
to netlinx-comm...@googlegroups.com
kim.john.burgess commented on revision r23 in project amx-netlinx-common.
Details are at
http://code.google.com/p/amx-netlinx-common/source/detail?r=23

Score: Positive

General Comment:
What was breaking when the program_name statements were omitted?

I'm for keeping them in, but I'm just curious as I couldn't get the
compiler to squeal when I left them out.

Also, should they be moved to be within the compiler conditional so that if
the include is added to a project multiple times everything still plays
nice?

Respond to these comments at
http://code.google.com/p/amx-netlinx-common/source/detail?r=23
--
You received this message because you starred this review, or because
your project has directed all notifications to a mailing list that you
subscribe to.
You may adjust your review notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages