Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Low tax burden
2 views
Skip to first unread message
William Swan
Mar 17, 1986, 11:08:50 AM3/17/86
to
In article <4...@ccivax.UUCP> r...@ccivax.UUCP (What's in a name ?) writes:
>Anybody know which state has the lowest REAL TAX burdon?
>Anybody know which state has the lowest REAL TAX burdon?
I don't know about the lowest, but I hear that Washington (the state) has
one of the *highest*, in spite of not having an "income tax". They hit you
for everything else, instead!
On the other hand, by taxing everything else to death you also get to hit up
the tourists, too! Side note: There's a rumour that the Washington highway
patrol (who _love_ to ambush motorists in freeway speed traps) are planning
an extra special effort this summer in honour of Expo '86. A little extra
cash for money-starved Washington..
g...@slu70.uucp
Mar 26, 1986, 9:32:52 AM3/26/86
to
In article <6...@sigma.UUCP>, bi...@sigma.UUCP (William Swan) writes:
> In article <4...@ccivax.UUCP> r...@ccivax.UUCP (What's in a name ?) writes:
>
> I don't know about the lowest, but I hear that Washington (the state) has
> one of the *highest*, in spite of not having an "income tax". They hit you
> for everything else, instead!
>
They have one of the highest if not *the* highest liquor taxes in the country.> In article <4...@ccivax.UUCP> r...@ccivax.UUCP (What's in a name ?) writes:
>
> I don't know about the lowest, but I hear that Washington (the state) has
> one of the *highest*, in spite of not having an "income tax". They hit you
> for everything else, instead!
>
If you're traveling through, buy your liquor elsewhere.
0 new messages