Hi.
Russ Allbery
> <FISH><
Hi. :)
--
Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Wednesday
Tim Skirvin <tski...@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> <FISH><
/FISH>
--
yeah, that wednesday "Durex Modoms. Always use safe hex." - SRD
Bryan C. Andregg
On 23 Apr 1999 10:06:57 +0100 (BST), <wedn...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <tskirvin-19992...@arh0650.urh.uiuc.edu>,
> Tim Skirvin <tski...@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> > <FISH><
>
> /FISH>
--
Bryan C. Andregg * <band...@redhat.com> * Red Hat Software
F5 F3 DC 2E 8E AF 26 B0 2C 31 78 C2 6C FB 02 77
Andrew
Bryan C. Andregg <br...@redhat.com> wrote:
> <BIGFISH>
> On 23 Apr 1999 10:06:57 +0100 (BST), <wedn...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> In article <tskirvin-19992...@arh0650.urh.uiuc.edu>,
>> Tim Skirvin <tski...@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>> > <FISH><
>>
>> /FISH>
> </BIGFISH>
--
Andrew O. Smith - <a...@insync.net>
Sysadmin, Insync Internet Services
Houston, Texas, USA
nymph lode
<ABE VIGODA><
rone
--
This .signature has been accessed [IMAGE] times. <ro...@ennui.org>
Kai Henningsen
> <BIGFISH>
> On 23 Apr 1999 10:06:57 +0100 (BST), <wedn...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> > wrote: In article <tskirvin-19992...@arh0650.urh.uiuc.edu>,
> > Tim Skirvin <tski...@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> > > <FISH><
> >
> > /FISH>
> </BIGFISH>
>
> --
> Bryan C. Andregg * <band...@redhat.com> * Red Hat Software
>
> F5 F3 DC 2E 8E AF 26 B0 2C 31 78 C2 6C FB 02 77
2:0:E: no document type declaration; will parse without validation
3:46:E: character "@" not allowed in attribute specification list
4:42:E: character "@" not allowed in attribute specification list
5:23:E: character "@" not allowed in attribute specification list
9:9:E: end tag for "FISH" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this
6:4: start tag was here
9:9:E: end tag for "TSKIRVIN" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this
5:14: start tag was here
9:9:E: end tag for "TSKIRVIN-19992222192201-9095" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this
4:13: start tag was here
9:9:E: end tag for "WEDNSDAY" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this
3:37: start tag was here
11:0:E: character data is not allowed here
12:44:E: character "@" not allowed in attribute specification list
12:44:E: document type does not allow element "BANDREGG" here
14:49:E: end tag for "BANDREGG" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this
12:35: start tag was here
<BIGFISH>On 23 Apr 1999 10:06:57 +0100 (BST), <WEDNSDAY>chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <TSKIRVIN-19992222192201-9095>arh0650.urh.uiuc.edu>,
> Tim Skirvin <TSKIRVIN>uiuc.edu> wrote:
> > <FISH><
>
> /FISH></FISH></TSKIRVIN></TSKIRVIN-19992222192201-9095></WEDNSDAY></BIGFISH>--
Bryan C. Andregg * <BANDREGG>redhat.com> * Red Hat Software
F5 F3 DC 2E 8E AF 26 B0 2C 31 78 C2 6C FB 02 77</BANDREGG>
Kai
--
http://www.westfalen.de/private/khms/
"... by God I *KNOW* what this network is for, and you can't have it."
- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu)
Felix Kronlage
<SHARK>
><TUNA>
>Bryan C. Andregg <br...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> <BIGFISH>
>> On 23 Apr 1999 10:06:57 +0100 (BST), <wedn...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>> In article <tskirvin-19992...@arh0650.urh.uiuc.edu>,
>>> Tim Skirvin <tski...@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>> > <FISH><
>>>
>>> /FISH>
>> </BIGFISH>
></TUNA>
</SHARK> well-fed :-)
-fk
--
If you don't find it - grind it!
(counts for horrible cardrivers as well as for terrible Hard Disk
Management by some Operating Systems)
http://nomaam.argh.org // poncho on IRC // PGP-ID: 0xF67809B5
Eli the Bearded
> I'll let my headers speak for themselves.
(For those not paying attention:
X-fish: <darwin><
)
I've read that the Roman Catholic Church considers capybaras fish
for dietary purposes while zoologists will probably think of them
as the world's largest rodent.
Elijah
------
portrayed a capybara in a play when he was in elementary school
Jim Kingdon
> for dietary purposes while zoologists will probably think of them
> as the world's largest rodent.
Well, yes about the latter, they tend to be billed as the world's
largest rodent at the zoos I've been to, and the zoos tend to follow
scientific nomenclature (sometimes with a rather extreme and strident
notion in terms of thinking that popular nomenclature should match,
but that is a whole separate topic).
This tends to come up when my father is along; he is not a fan of
rodents.
As for the dietary purposes, it is my (very vague) impression that the
Catholic definition of fish has gotten stretched in various ways at
various times and places, but that the whole thing is kind of a moot
point now as far as I know (didn't Vatican II get rid of the fish on
Fridays rule? Or it fell by the waywide in the US around the same
time?).
-dsr-
Tim Skirvin may have written:
> Jim Kingdon <kin...@panix7.panix.com> writes:
>> I've read that the Roman Catholic Church considers capybaras fish
>> for dietary purposes while zoologists will probably think of them
>> as the world's largest rodent.
>
> As for the dietary purposes, it is my (very vague) impression that the
> Catholic definition of fish has gotten stretched in various ways at
> various times and places, but that the whole thing is kind of a moot
> point now as far as I know (didn't Vatican II get rid of the fish on
> Fridays rule? Or it fell by the waywide in the US around the same
> time?).
But even stranger is the way we Jews classify fish: along with vegetables.
See, food is meat, or dairy, or "parve" (everything else) and somehow fish
become parve.
I don't get it. Maybe I should look it up in the Talmud.
-dsr-