Setting the baseline from which people differentiate on the level of human dignity.

[Me]

Setting the baseline from which people differentiate on the
level of human dignity.

Hallo , greed; When you found yourself A HUMAN.

People do not consume beyond their physical capacity.

and more is available; prohibition can work the reverse - like the
reverse psychology or social rebound AND DO THE OPPOSITE IN THE LARGER
SCALE ( enhanced by thefacts that dranks alredy are oppositional)

HAVING POLICE PROSECUTE PERSON FOR CONSUMING THE PIECE THAT OTHERWISE
IS ACOMMON GOOD IS NOT ONLY THE BIGGEST WASTE OF OUR CIVILISATION; IS
THE 'EVIDENCE' OF THE LIMITED SOCIAL MIND ( never mind these new
groups that produces extras for Bushland only - it already ravishes
us).

( someone sign that libertarians wilkl disagree; they are wrong;
that is the point of libertarian politics not to intervenue when it is
not necessary)

This actually was tried on me; we call such police 'Stupid Dangle' -
person who is hangry in their book gets persecuted when takes
otherwise publically owned piece ( AND I WANT TOGO SLIGHTLY BEYOND
THAT TO DISTRIBUTE THE OVEREPRODUCTION MARGIN EASY WAY, AS PER THAT
NEW POLICY OF THE SUPERMARKETS TO SELL FEW TRACKS YTRANSPORTING LEFT
OVERS TO FOOD BANKS BEACUSE THEY LOSE THE LEFTOVER BEFORE THAT).

That is what we need to lose and lose fast on the large scale.

Listning to the discussions in USA Senate how else to hurt small
( to their big mind) people has become disgusting; what I point to all
is that they are not only not American as pragmatism is; they might
be
seen illegal. I managed to uphold this point somewhat in Philadelphia
-
there the Stupid Dangle (SD) can not touch the repectable visitor
any more. This even got implemented to the culture there.

I am working to expand the idea not to cycle the goods thet otherwise
are the essential right of the person, as basic food is. It is not
about medicracy - it is about setting the baseline from which people
differentiate on the level of human dignity.