Hello?

[David Iain Greig]

Jay Denebeim <dene...@deepthot.ml.org> wrote:
>Catherine Hampton <x...@hrweb.org> wrote:
>>I will create any net.religion.* newsgroup that appears wanted.
>
>How about net.religion.scientology :-)

USENET TOO POTSERS CRITIZISE CONTUMELIOUSLY WHILE THE CHRUCH
CONTINUES TO EXPAND DAILY.

WOODY

[Jim Kingdon]

> David Iain Greig <gr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> : USENET TOO POTSERS CRITIZISE CONTUMELIOUSLY WHILE THE CHRUCH

> : CONTINUES TO EXPAND DAILY.
> : WOODY
>

> Woody -- if you are in fact the Scientology apologist of that name who
> hangs out in alt.religion.scientology, please get lost.

Uh, I think David Iain Greig (who is not new to net.*, if memory
serves) is pulling your (our) chain.

And quite entertainingly, I might add. And I don't even know the
real Woody. Nor want to, I suspect.

> (Although I guess [trolls are] ok in net.religion.flame.) ;>

Hmm, I'm just as eager as the next person to try to get this group
back on topic, but I don't know if we're (yet) desperate enough to
turn to scientology. I mean, we've just barely scratched the
surface. Atheist vs. Christian and various attempts at Christian
vs. Christian are all well and good, but we've hardly scratched the
surface of Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, &c. ;>

[Catherine Hampton]

David Iain Greig <gr...@ediacara.org> wrote:

: Jay Denebeim <dene...@deepthot.ml.org> wrote:
:>Catherine Hampton <x...@hrweb.org> wrote:
:>>I will create any net.religion.* newsgroup that appears wanted.
:>
:>How about net.religion.scientology :-)

: USENET TOO POTSERS CRITIZISE CONTUMELIOUSLY WHILE THE CHRUCH
: CONTINUES TO EXPAND DAILY.

: WOODY

Woody -- if you are in fact the Scientology apologist of that name who

hangs out in alt.religion.scientology, please get lost. Net.religion.*
isn't intended for trolls. :/ (Although I guess they're ok in
net.religion.flame.) ;>

--
Catherine Hampton <net-reli...@hrweb.org>
Net Religion Czar, Despot, Chief Cook and Bottlewasher ;>

(Please note that the address in the From: line exists, is valid,
and is also used as a spamtrap. Send email to the address in my
signature if you want me to see it any time soon.)

[David Iain Greig]

Jim Kingdon <kin...@panix3.panix.com> wrote:
>> David Iain Greig <gr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>> : USENET TOO POTSERS CRITIZISE CONTUMELIOUSLY WHILE THE CHRUCH
>> : CONTINUES TO EXPAND DAILY.
>> : WOODY
>>
>> Woody -- if you are in fact the Scientology apologist of that name who
>> hangs out in alt.religion.scientology, please get lost.
>

>Uh, I think David Iain Greig (who is not new to net.*, if memory
>serves) is pulling your (our) chain.

Indeed. But you'd have to be a regular on a.r.s. to get it.

The real 'woody' was a rather inane spambot with broken spelling,
and I recall he used _argumentum ad CAPSLOCK_ freely. Formerly
see on .r.s. a couple years ago. Sort of the prototype pro-COS
spammer.

--D.

--
david iain greig gr...@ediacara.org
sp4 kox
http://www.ediacara.org/~greig arbor plena alouattarum

[Catherine Hampton]

Russ Allbery <r...@stanford.edu> wrote:

: So when's the automated CGI voting script with the real-time table update
: on the web coming?

When you or someone else arranges to pay me a nice salary for running
net.religion.* ;>

: (Oh, wait, this should be in net.religion.flame....)

Thread hereby transferred to a new newsgroup. :>