mystery-game response. Why did this mail originally fail ??

[Eric, Digital, Maynard, 617 493-6664]

From: RHEA::RHEA::DECWRL::rhea::MAILER-DAEMON 17-MAR-1986 22:59
To: rhea::roxie::osman ! Eric, Digital, Maynard, 617 493-6664
Subj: Unable to deliver mail to decwrl::amdcad

Bad recipient name syntax or no such user
Date: Monday, 17 Mar 1986 11:26:16-PST

------- Returned Message

Date: 17-Mar-1986 1415
From: rhea::roxie::osman (Eric, Digital, Maynard, 617 493-6664)
To: decwrl::amdcad, amdcad!clyde!watmath!utcsri!kato
Subject: RE: the \yes-no mystery\ game
From: RHEA::DECWRL::"amdcad!clyde!watmath!utcsri!kato" "John Kitamura" 14-MAR-1986 18:46
To: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-sierra!osman
Subj: RE: the \"yes-no mystery\" game

In-Reply-To: your article <16...@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Received: from DECWRL by DEC-RHEA with SMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 86 15:43-PST
Received: by decwrl.DEC.COM (4.22.03/4.7.34)
id AA02316; Fri, 14 Mar 86 15:42:51 pst
Received: by amdcad.UUCP (4.12/4.7)
id AA17554; Fri, 14 Mar 86 14:45:56 pst
Received: by clyde.UUCP; id AA13668; 14 Mar 86 08:59:25 EST (Fri)
Received: from utzoo.UUCP by watmath; Fri, 14 Mar 86 02:38:54 est
Received: by utcsri.UUCP (4.24/5.1.UofT)
id AA06487; Thu, 13 Mar 86 15:31:28 est
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 86 15:31:28 est
Message-Id: <8603132031.AA06487@utcsri.UUCP>

Wouldn't it be better if there were fifty-three bicycles?

Yeah, come to think of it, that's probably how it's supposed to go !

Thanks.

/Eric

------- End of Returned Message

[twb]

>
> Wouldn't it be better if there were fifty-three bicycles?
> Yeah, come to think of it, that's probably how it's supposed to go !
> Thanks.
> /Eric

I use 51 Bicycles.
The point is that you can only *see* 51 because someone had 1
"up-his-sleeve"
Tom.
..{decvax | ucbvax}!ihnp4!hoqax!twb