That's one of the points that I plan to bring up in my first posting.
>
>I for one am sympathetic to PSI, I just think a discussion of even the
>most minimal quality has yet to get started, as far as I can see all we
>get is a bunch of defensive psycho-babble with a few laced together
>buzzwords all of a distinctly adolescent bent (like the above quote.)
That is going to be one of the major uses for the group: the comparison
and finalizing of defintions. The determining of criterion, etc.
>
>I've spent years speaking with people and reading about subjects like
>Crowley, the Kabbala (I was raised by "Kabbalists"), PSI etc, nah, I
>haven't seen anything yet on these lists worthy of discussion, the quality
>is zip.
>
Well, we'll see...
Gryphon