Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A Serious Person
16 views
Skip to first unread message
Martin Schoffstall
Nov 9, 1983, 7:51:12 AM11/9/83
to
Let's be fair Steve, the flames are 50/50, right now. Maybe
the net should think about about having to groups:
the net should think about about having to groups:
net.for-motss's-only
net.motss.discuss
I don't think the limitations of what you want to be discussed
in this group is going to work. One thing that has to be faced
is the fact that the net decides what is discussed not a few
individuals even if it is a "good" idea.
feat...@ihuxf.uucp
Nov 9, 1983, 6:07:34 PM11/9/83
to
Actually re: net.for-motss's-only and net.motss.discuss
It was tried with net.women and net.women.only, and <THEY>
(flamethrowers) still barge in!
John Quarterman
Nov 10, 1983, 1:45:35 AM11/10/83
to
There already is a place for religious discussions: net.religion.
I agree with hao!woods that I'm tired of hearing a bunch of straights
flaming. In my case, I am tired of hearing a bunch of straights flaming
about their religious objections to homosexuality and a bunch of people
flaming back at them. Net.motss *is* just another newsgroup. It deserves
neither the condescending USENET mavens trying to prove their broadmindedness
nor the condescending net.religion evangelizing where it's not wanted.
I agree with hao!woods that I'm tired of hearing a bunch of straights
flaming. In my case, I am tired of hearing a bunch of straights flaming
about their religious objections to homosexuality and a bunch of people
flaming back at them. Net.motss *is* just another newsgroup. It deserves
neither the condescending USENET mavens trying to prove their broadmindedness
nor the condescending net.religion evangelizing where it's not wanted.
At least that's not what I fought for.
--
John Quarterman, CS Dept., University of Texas, Austin, Texas
{ihnp4,seismo,kpno,ctvax}!ut-sally!jsq, jsq@ut-sally.{ARPA,UUCP}
0 new messages