Groups

Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

net.mail.headers

1–30 of 324

0 selected

11/8/86

This account is scheduled to be deleted soon...

And to avoid the last-minute rush, I have to start dropping myself from all the mailing lists I am on

unread,

This account is scheduled to be deleted soon...

And to avoid the last-minute rush, I have to start dropping myself from all the mailing lists I am on

11/8/86

11/7/86

net.mail.headers is being renamed comp.mail.headers

This newsgroup is being renamed from net.mail.headers to comp.mail.headers. This renaming will

unread,

net.mail.headers is being renamed comp.mail.headers

This newsgroup is being renamed from net.mail.headers to comp.mail.headers. This renaming will

11/7/86

Postmaster + BITINFO

11/6/86

One of the things that can be done to reduce the amount of list mail going across the ARPANET/BITNET

unread,

One of the things that can be done to reduce the amount of list mail going across the ARPANET/BITNET

11/6/86

Craig F. Everhart, … Joseph S. D. Yao4

11/5/86

CONFIRM-DELIVERY

The TOFACS mail system uses Send-Receipt: as the mail header. When the receipt is sent once, this

unread,

CONFIRM-DELIVERY

The TOFACS mail system uses Send-Receipt: as the mail header. When the receipt is sent once, this

11/5/86

Jordan Hayes, … L.H. Landweber4

11/1/86

While it may anti-social to use bitnet/internet gateways other than wiscvm, it certainly is rational.

unread,

While it may anti-social to use bitnet/internet gateways other than wiscvm, it certainly is rational.

11/1/86

Jacob_Palme_QZ...@mit-multics.arpa

10/20/86

Mailing-list standard proposal

The AMIGO project in Europe has developed a proposal for a standard way of handling mailing-lists.

unread,

Mailing-list standard proposal

The AMIGO project in Europe has developed a proposal for a standard way of handling mailing-lists.

10/20/86

Jeff Stearns, … Henry Spencer10

10/20/86

Do you rewrite "From:" lines?

> >Um, not correct: dumb V7 mailers have no concept of mail headers at all, > >much less

unread,

Do you rewrite "From:" lines?

> >Um, not correct: dumb V7 mailers have no concept of mail headers at all, > >much less

10/20/86

Jacob_Palme_QZ...@mit-multics.arpa

10/19/86

CONFIRM-DELIVERY

The problem of intelligent handling of confirmations can be split into two parts: (a) Formatting the

unread,

CONFIRM-DELIVERY

The problem of intelligent handling of confirmations can be split into two parts: (a) Formatting the

10/19/86

10/8/86

sendmail & rnews

I recently installed sendmail on my system (System V) and have had no trouble other than the

unread,

sendmail & rnews

I recently installed sendmail on my system (System V) and have had no trouble other than the

10/8/86

Jacob_Palme_QZ...@mit-multics.arpa, … J.R. Stoner8

10/4/86

CONFIRM: DELIVERY

Since there is no such thing as a net.mail.request I must apologise for posting here. My copies of

unread,

CONFIRM: DELIVERY

Since there is no such thing as a net.mail.request I must apologise for posting here. My copies of

10/4/86

The lost Bostonian, s...@ucb-vax.arpa2

9/30/86

SMTP, 2600, and the security of mail

It's important to remember that SMTP is used on non-TCP virtual circuits. For example, some hosts

unread,

SMTP, 2600, and the security of mail

It's important to remember that SMTP is used on non-TCP virtual circuits. For example, some hosts

9/30/86

9/30/86

telnetting to port 25

Has anybody thought of a good solution to this problem? One that I once implemented was to make smtp

unread,

telnetting to port 25

Has anybody thought of a good solution to this problem? One that I once implemented was to make smtp

9/30/86

9/30/86

Known toplevel domains (summary)

[ The list appended to this article is the union of the list I circulated a few weeks ago and one

unread,

Known toplevel domains (summary)

[ The list appended to this article is the union of the list I circulated a few weeks ago and one

9/30/86

Will Martin -- AMXAL-RI, John Gilmore2

9/29/86

Can a user \"prod\" a remote host?

When I was managing mail in the Sun internal network, I ended up adding an option to sendmail which

unread,

Can a user \"prod\" a remote host?

When I was managing mail in the Sun internal network, I ended up adding an option to sendmail which

9/29/86

9/26/86

Timezone -- and header hammering.

Oops, I forgot to send this out when it was timely so here it is late ... The problem for Don Winter

unread,

Timezone -- and header hammering.

Oops, I forgot to send this out when it was timely so here it is late ... The problem for Don Winter

9/26/86

Rob Austein, Jordan M. Hayes5

9/26/86

Can a user \"prod\" a remote host?

You're right. And this just a few days after I was caught pontificating in public on why one

unread,

Can a user \"prod\" a remote host?

You're right. And this just a few days after I was caught pontificating in public on why one

9/26/86

9/24/86

CONFIRM-DELIVERY

From a technical standpoint, I agree with Bob Austein's comment. We have enough problems already

unread,

CONFIRM-DELIVERY

From a technical standpoint, I agree with Bob Austein's comment. We have enough problems already

9/24/86

9/22/86

[Henry Dardy: RE: Ultrix 1.2 and unacceptable tcp packets]

This must win some kind of award for stupid date lines... ----- Forwarded message # 1: Received: from

unread,

[Henry Dardy: RE: Ultrix 1.2 and unacceptable tcp packets]

This must win some kind of award for stupid date lines... ----- Forwarded message # 1: Received: from

9/22/86

9/11/86

Existing top-level domains (list) and a new naming rule

The following is a message posted to the mailgroup DL in the UK ... the problem of ambiguity between

unread,

Existing top-level domains (list) and a new naming rule

The following is a message posted to the mailgroup DL in the UK ... the problem of ambiguity between

9/11/86

Michael C. Berch

9/10/86

MCI Mail <--> Internet/UUCP gateway?

We just had a sales presentation by a rep for MCI Mail, who was promoting their "Link"

unread,

MCI Mail <--> Internet/UUCP gateway?

We just had a sales presentation by a rep for MCI Mail, who was promoting their "Link"

9/10/86

Einar Stefferud

9/2/86

REPEAT C Call for Papers WG 6.5

------- Forwarded Message Subject: Call for Papers WG 6.5 From: Peter Schicker <schicker%ean.cs.

unread,

REPEAT C Call for Papers WG 6.5

------- Forwarded Message Subject: Call for Papers WG 6.5 From: Peter Schicker <schicker%ean.cs.

9/2/86

John C. Klensin

8/24/86

Jacob, The mailer agent at Multics canonicalizes dates and times into an internal format when they

unread,

Jacob, The mailer agent at Multics canonicalizes dates and times into an internal format when they

8/24/86

Jacob_Palme_QZ...@mit-multics.arpa

8/18/86

As you can see from the header of this message, we at QZCOM use "+0200" when Western Europe

unread,

As you can see from the header of this message, we at QZCOM use "+0200" when Western Europe

8/18/86

OUWEHAND@hlerul5

8/18/86

BITNET mail follows

Please put me on the list. OUWEHAND@HLERUL5 (EARN)

unread,

BITNET mail follows

Please put me on the list. OUWEHAND@HLERUL5 (EARN)

8/18/86

FOXEA%VTV...@wiscvm.arpa

8/13/86

Suggestions for Single System Image (SSI) project

At Virginia Tech we have embarked upon a project to facilitate first mail and later other

unread,

Suggestions for Single System Image (SSI) project

At Virginia Tech we have embarked upon a project to facilitate first mail and later other

8/13/86

XBR1YD14%DDA...@wiscvm.arpa, Bob Devine2

8/12/86

In article <28...@brl-smoke.ARPA> XBR1YD14%DDATHD2...@wiscvm.ARPA (YD...@BR1.THDNET) writes:

unread,

In article <28...@brl-smoke.ARPA> XBR1YD14%DDATHD2...@wiscvm.ARPA (YD...@BR1.THDNET) writes:

8/12/86

POS...@usc-isib.arpa

8/10/86

Reinhard Goeth: Numeric timezones indicators should be as specified by ISO 4031. You are correct that

unread,

Reinhard Goeth: Numeric timezones indicators should be as specified by ISO 4031. You are correct that

8/10/86

Steve Kille, Jacob_Palme_QZ...@mit-multics.arpa2

8/4/86

Distribution lists

(a) We wanted something which (i) would work both under RFC822/821 and under X.400, including

unread,

Distribution lists

(a) We wanted something which (i) would work both under RFC822/821 and under X.400, including

8/4/86

Jacob_Palme_QZ...@mit-multics.arpa

8/3/86

Hiearchical structure for loop control in distribution lists

Assume the following hierarchical structure of a distribution list: +-----TOP------+ ! ! SUBA-----+

unread,

Hiearchical structure for loop control in distribution lists

Assume the following hierarchical structure of a distribution list: +-----TOP------+ ! ! SUBA-----+

8/3/86

7/22/86

This was rejected by our domain server/mail system. Can't get thru to the correct NS at present,

unread,

This was rejected by our domain server/mail system. Can't get thru to the correct NS at present,

7/22/86

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu