Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

lisp vs C

205 views
Skip to first unread message

Doug Kent

unread,
Aug 27, 1986, 11:58:18 AM8/27/86
to
I am an experienced C programmer interested in learning lisp. My interest
is inspired by the Symbolics graphics system, written in lisp, which exhibits
wonderful flexibility and power. I wonder if anyone would be interested
in answering a couple questions?

1) Is such flexibility and power a trait unique to lisp, or are the Symbolics
programmers simply very good (or both)?

2) How does lisp compare to C in terms of speed and other characteristics?

Thanks. If I get many responses, I will post to the net.

Doug Kent
Psychology Dept.
University of N. Carolina
Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514
919-966-3540
... decvax!mcnc!unc!kent

**********************************************************
***** Geniuses are so crazy cause they know too much *****
**********************************************************

Jeffrey Jacobs

unread,
Aug 30, 1986, 2:23:34 PM8/30/86
to

In <2...@unc.unc.UUCP>, Doug Kent writes:

>I am an experienced C programmer interested in learning lisp. My interest
>is inspired by the Symbolics graphics system, written in lisp, which exhibits
>wonderful flexibility and power. I wonder if anyone would be interested
>in answering a couple questions?

>1) Is such flexibility and power a trait unique to lisp, or are the Symbolics
> programmers simply very good (or both)?

>2) How does lisp compare to C in terms of speed and other characteristics?

Such flexibility and power are very common in LISP and are by no means
unique to Symbolics. (Whether it's UNIQUE to lisp is a different question
which could start a giant war). There are also 'different' forms
of flexibility and power. See some of the other forms of LISP, such as
FRANZ, INTER-, UCI, etc.

LISP in general is a wonderful language...

For areas in which you can make a comparision between LISP and C,
C will generally be faster. Such areas are difficult to find. You can
compare arithmetic operations and will find that C will be faster,
but most of the features that are intrinsic to LISP are not intrinsic
to C, i.e. functions on lists, dynamic macro expansion.

You might want to take a look at XLISP, a freely distributed LISP
written in very vanilla C. It runs on most PC's, including IBM/MS-DOS,
Mac and ATARI. It is widely available, both in executable and
in source form. You can get it from the Boston Computer Society
BBS and CompuServe's AI Expert forum.

Or you can get it directly from the author. Send a floppy and $10 to:

David Betz
114 Davenport Ave.
Manchester, NH 03103

David is now charging $10 for handling. You can mention my name.

Jeffrey M. Jacobs
CONSART Systems Inc.
Technical and Managerial Consultants
P.O. Box 3016, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
(213)376-3802
CIS:75076,2603
BIX:jeffjacobs
USENET: well!jjacobs

Matthew Belmonte

unread,
Sep 8, 1986, 1:20:26 PM9/8/86
to
In article <16...@well.UUCP>, jja...@well.UUCP (Jeffrey Jacobs) writes:
> You might want to take a look at XLISP, a freely distributed LISP
> written in very vanilla C. It runs on most PC's, including IBM/MS-DOS,
> Mac and ATARI. It is widely available, both in executable and
> in source form. You can get it from the Boston Computer Society
> BBS and CompuServe's AI Expert forum.
for anyone else out there who uses os-9, there is an os-9 version (as opposed
to the above-mentioned "very vanilla" version) available in the os-9 SIG
on compuserve. the level 1 version, however, is **very** stripped-down due
to limits on memory.
--
Matthew Belmonte
ARPA:
<belm...@rocky.cs.cornell.edu>
<belm...@svax.cs.cornell.edu>
BITNET:
<d25y@cornella>
UUCP:
..!decvax!duke!duknbsr!mkb
0 new messages