>Chocolate coated pretzels.
>
>I'm not sure whether it tasted really good or really bad.
I *love* chocolate-coated pretzels. (Not white 'chocolate', but then
again I have a moral problem with white 'chocolate'. And preferably
the regular semi-heart-shaped pretzels instead of sticks or chunky
German/Bavarian kinds.)
Ben & Jerry's, the decadent ice-cream people, make a flavor called
Chubby Hubby which is vanilla ice cream with chocolate covered
pretzels and (I think) caramel and fudge. Mmmmm.
***
Kate Wrightson
ka...@rigel.econ.uga.edu
"One must have chaos within oneself to give birth to a dancing star."
Oooh, I love those. (Yogurt-covered ones are good too, strangely
enough.) But then, chocolate covered just-about-anything is yummy.
(peanuts, raisins, boyfriend..errr...)
--
Victoria C. Fike | Sunrise, wrong side of another day
Imperatrix Ludorum | Sky-high and six thousand miles away
to...@cugc.org | Don't know how long I've been awake...
http://www.cugc.org | --Hawkwind, "Motorhead"
Never seen those. Sounds intriguing. Any suggestions how to find some?
-Neil
Dude, you're in violation of Usenet II soundness policies. Post with a valid,
replyable email address.
"All messages must contain, in the header, a valid email address for the
author."
>Chocolate coated pretzels.
Those have been around for a while, or so I thought... I believe that only
recently did one of the big pretzel companies start doing them.
>A cow-orker gave me some yesterday. This has to be one of the more,
>err, unusual taste combinations I have tried recently.
Try a yogurt covered pretzel sometime.
>I'm not sure whether it tasted really good or really bad.
I think they taste great. I've discovered a fantastic flavor of Ben&Jerry's:
Chubby Hubby. It contains chocolate-covered pretzel bites *stuffed* with
peanut butter.
rif...@afn.org : Engineers: often wrong, seldom in doubt.
Jeff The Riffer :
Drifter... :
Homo Postmortemus :
That's what I get for not reading ahead.
Are you as hungry as I am? Hmmm, Winn-Dixie is still open...
rif...@afn.org : "Rush Limbaugh says so" is NOT proof!
>NOSPA...@atdotNOSPAMat.atat.dotat.org (Phil Homewood) wrote:
>
>Dude, you're in violation of Usenet II soundness policies. Post with a valid,
>replyable email address.
I agree, email addresses with only A records and no MX aren't very nice, but
that's not the same as saying they're actually invalid.