Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
W and Z decay
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Courtenay Footman
Aug 7, 1985, 4:29:41 PM8/7/85
to
> One point I did not quite understand. Are those branching ratios
>meant to refer to electrons only or electrons, muons or taus?
>It would seem that all three would be allowable on energetic grounds
>Is there some other reason why electron decay is preferred?
The branching ratios refer to only electrons. The W and Z do decay
into muons and taus, but these decays are much harder to detect.
The acceptance for detecting electrons is quite high in both UA1 and UA2.
UA2 makes no attempt to identify muons, and the acceptance for muons at
UA1 is about half that of electrons. (This is my own estimate based
on UA1's data.) Taus decay before they get anywhere near the detector,
and so present a much harder signal to decipher. Indeed, the UA1
group thinks some of their W->ev signal is actually W-(tau)v->(evv)v,
but there is no way to say that that is what happened on any particular
event.
Update on my previous posting: some analysis of 1984 data has
been released. (A person from UA2 gave a seminar here last week.)
The new limits, based on both UA1 and UA2 data, are:
From the Z width: N(v) < 10, 90% C.L.
From the branching ratio ratio: N(v) < 5, 90% C.L.
Note that the first limit has gone down, while the second has gone up.
--
Courtenay Footman arpa: cpf@lnsvax
Newman Lab. of Nuclear Studies usenet: cornell!lnsvax!cpf
Cornell University
>meant to refer to electrons only or electrons, muons or taus?
>It would seem that all three would be allowable on energetic grounds
>Is there some other reason why electron decay is preferred?
The branching ratios refer to only electrons. The W and Z do decay
into muons and taus, but these decays are much harder to detect.
The acceptance for detecting electrons is quite high in both UA1 and UA2.
UA2 makes no attempt to identify muons, and the acceptance for muons at
UA1 is about half that of electrons. (This is my own estimate based
on UA1's data.) Taus decay before they get anywhere near the detector,
and so present a much harder signal to decipher. Indeed, the UA1
group thinks some of their W->ev signal is actually W-(tau)v->(evv)v,
but there is no way to say that that is what happened on any particular
event.
Update on my previous posting: some analysis of 1984 data has
been released. (A person from UA2 gave a seminar here last week.)
The new limits, based on both UA1 and UA2 data, are:
From the Z width: N(v) < 10, 90% C.L.
From the branching ratio ratio: N(v) < 5, 90% C.L.
Note that the first limit has gone down, while the second has gone up.
--
Courtenay Footman arpa: cpf@lnsvax
Newman Lab. of Nuclear Studies usenet: cornell!lnsvax!cpf
Cornell University
0 new messages