Vote called on Issue #9 owin.RequestUser

[Ryan Riley]

If you would like to vote, please add your +1, +0, -0 or -1 to the end of the thread. If you voted before, please do so again, as it's difficult to tell if your  was for a previous comment or to vote for this item. Voting is for the spec as listed in the description in the issue. https://github.com/owin/owin/issues/9

[Ryan Riley]

Voting will soon close. Please submit remaining votes.

https://github.com/owin/owin/issues/9

[Ryan Riley]

The vote was called over a week ago. Should we close voting?

[Damian Hickey]

Yes imho

On 24 October 2014 15:54, Ryan Riley <ryan....@panesofglass.org> wrote:

The vote was called over a week ago. Should we close voting?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OWIN working group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to net-http-abstrac...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Ryan Riley]

Done. Voting closed, and the spec was accepted and added to the OWIN spec: https://github.com/owin/owin/blob/master/owin.md#321-request-data.

Thanks, everyone!

Ryan

[Sebastien Lambla]

It would be great if we got a principle agreement on not adding keys to the spec, 1.0.1 should only contain required keys, all the others should be on a separate registry.

See the github issue entries i’ve suggested, few have received feedback…

--

[Ryan Riley]

On Friday, October 24, 2014 10:12:47 AM UTC-5, SerialSeb wrote:

It would be great if we got a principle agreement on not adding keys to the spec, 1.0.1 should only contain required keys, all the others should be on a separate registry.

See the github issue entries i’ve suggested, few have received feedback…

I would love to do that, but until we have a better idea of where such things should go (and which ones should move), we don't have a good place to move them. Would you mind submitting a PR and moving the discussion to that PR? That would provide a more obvious change against which to discuss and, once merged, make additional changes.

Cheers!

Ryan