Working on Issue 133

59 views
Skip to first unread message

Shreesha Bharadwaj .

unread,
Oct 25, 2021, 3:00:55 AM10/25/21
to NeST users
Hi,  

We are a team consisting of the following people :
Vignesh Srinivasan - vigneshsriniv...@nitk.edu.in
Nuthan Kumar S - nuthankuma...@nitk.edu.in
Shreesha Bharadwaj - shreesha...@nitk.edu.in

We will be working on Issue 133 - Add support for interfaces to have both IPv4 and IPv6 address. 

Thanks, 
Shreesha Bharadwaj

shanthanu.s.rai9

unread,
Oct 25, 2021, 3:02:44 AM10/25/21
to NeST users
Hey Shreesha, thanks for letting us know! You can use this mail thread to clarify any doubts regarding this issue.

Vignesh Srinivasan.

unread,
Oct 28, 2021, 10:15:45 PM10/28/21
to NeST users
Hi,

We noticed that there are 2 instances of set address and get address in interface.py
Instance 1 - lines 208-240
Instance 2 - lines 287-307
Both the instances seem to be performing the same task with the difference of one being a public member and the other a protected member. Additionally, the docstring of the methods in instance 2 says "*NOTE*: Maintained since mentioned in NeST paper." Does this mean instance 2 is non-functional and exists solely because it is mentioned in the paper?

shanthanu.s.rai9

unread,
Oct 29, 2021, 3:27:55 AM10/29/21
to NeST users
Hey Vignesh, I have replied to your query in the gitlab issue: https://gitlab.com/nitk-nest/nest/-/issues/133. Let's continue the discussion on GitLab, as it is the more appropriate forum for these queries. The user's mailing list is for resolving NeST user queries and issues.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
This conversation is locked
You cannot reply and perform actions on locked conversations.
0 new messages