C Programming A Modern Approach 2nd Edition Pdf

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Claudio Davey

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 1:36:32 PM8/5/24
to neouwestsunring
Withso many C programming textbooks to choose from, it can be hard to find one that's engaging and readable. The first edition of C Programming: A Modern Approach was a hit with instructors and students alike because of its clarity and comprehensiveness as well as its trademark Q&A sections. The book's spiral approach made the first edition accessible to a broad range of readers, from beginners to more advanced students. The first edition was used at over 225 colleges, making it one of the leading C textbooks of the last ten years. It was also popular among software developers, engineers, and other professionals who use C on the job.

What Readers Are Saying "KNK is now the logical heir to K&R ... In short, get this book." "By far the most thorough, accurate, and carefully thought out book on C I have ever read, possibly even the best programming book I have read." "Your book is wonderful and marvelous." "It was the best textbook I have ever read." "Thank you for writing a great text. I find it fun, challenging and yet easy to read." "I wish all computer text books were this good!" "Many of the concepts that I have been struggling to comprehend through other books are all now so crystal-clear to me." Read more


We use cookies and similar tools that are necessary to enable you to make purchases, to enhance your shopping experiences and to provide our services, as detailed in our Cookie notice. We also use these cookies to understand how customers use our services (for example, by measuring site visits) so we can make improvements.


If you agree, we'll also use cookies to complement your shopping experience across the Amazon stores as described in our Cookie notice. Your choice applies to using first-party and third-party advertising cookies on this service. Cookies store or access standard device information such as a unique identifier. The 103 third parties who use cookies on this service do so for their purposes of displaying and measuring personalized ads, generating audience insights, and developing and improving products. Click "Decline" to reject, or "Customise" to make more detailed advertising choices, or learn more. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Cookie preferences, as described in the Cookie notice. To learn more about how and for what purposes Amazon uses personal information (such as Amazon Store order history), please visit our Privacy notice.


Professor King's spiral approach made it accessible to a broad range of readers, from beginners to more advanced students. With adoptions at over 225 colleges, the first edition was one of the leading C textbooks of the last ten years. The second edition maintains all the book's popular features and brings it up to date with coverage of the C99 standard. The new edition also adds a significant number of exercises and longer programming projects, and includes extensive revisions and updates.


But I do really recommend learning C as your first language. Most will think that it's traditional, no one goes door to door these days, C is really old etc.

It can be though of assembly of first century.


I learned C when I was making my own Pokemon game with disassembly and decomps and really it helped a lot in understanding everything. Somethings were hard for me but I didn't lose hope and understood all of them. Then I tried to see other languages like Python, C++ and all. I found them very easy to understand and got well-versed.


I fully agree with your opinion on learning C language as first programming language. I started first with Pascal and then got to C language (well, my very first language was actually BASIC, but it was when I was 9 years old).


I think the same as you. The C was hard for me as well (especially pointer concepts), people around me always tell me why still learn a traditional language, why don't go javascript, even more, start learning program by tools or frameworks.


My first language was C++, however the way to learning C++ is by learning C firs. Especially back when i was young and all we had were dry boring manuals which guided you through variables, arrays, if statements etc and finally to structs and classes.


Pointers are only hard if you're not paying attention and didn't have them explained properly. If you properly explain the concept of indirection first (which most people will have no issue understanding, as the concept is baked into most natural languages), pointers will often come naturally as a logical extension when explained.


DMA is not a thing in most C coding unless you're doing OS-level code (like Linux kernel code) or tight embedded stuff that doesn't involve an OS. In fact, I've done a decent (not huge) amount of work in C and never touched DMA at all. It's more an assembly thing in many cases anyway.


OOP and abstractions are absolutely possible in C, that's part of what pointers (especially function pointers) and structs are for (your object is a struct, your methods are function pointers, and you use a constructor method just like you would in many languages). Check the Linux kernel source code if you don't believe me, they're more object-oriented in some places than a lot of C++ code I've seen.


I mostly agree with this. OP does have some opinionated arguments. But I feel as though C is a programming fundamental language like Python. At some point no matter what kind of developer you are you will have to interact with some C/C++ level issues. Another thing that is good to learn from C is the top down approach, because in JavaScript there is hoisting so the top down approach isn't always enforced regardless of the fact that certain things don't hoist.


I strongly agree that at some point, it's necessary to understand how things work, and C is perfect for that. However, in my opinion, the introduction to Computer Science should start with basic coding and introduction to Programming. By basic coding, I mean learning the basic concepts such as loops, variables, functions, etc. Students first need to understand what they are doing before knowing how everything works under the hood. I think that languages with simpler syntax may be better as the first language. After understanding what programs are and how they work at higher levels, it's time to dive in deeper and explore how everything works using C.


Hmm instead Rust? Learn a low-level language which is very modern and also offers many abstractions you would expect from a modern language. At the same time, performant, memorysafe and a great active community.


That is a nice idea for sure but what I have seen beginners doing while finding the length of array in Rust and C is you can just do arr.len() as it is a method but in C they will get confused on how to do it because they are used to in-built functions. You have to do sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]) in C. I think it is necessary to know how it's done in the inner workings.


The problem with C as a first language is that it's difficult to build something useful early on. You're left doing low-level exercises, rather than creating an application that can help your folks or impress your mates. I imagine this can be off-putting. Beginners might be left wondering: "Is this what programming is all about?"


In my University, at CS, they teach first functional with Haskell, one semester, then 3 semesters to understand fully C. I agree with you, but the only thing is that it makes it harder for you to learn functional programming, because you'll get used to imperative. Knowing that, C is a really good lang to start with CS.


AIMA has been called "the most popular artificial intelligence textbook in the world",[2] and is considered the standard text in the field of artificial intelligence.[3][4] As of 2023, it was being used at over 1500 universities worldwide,[5] and it has over 59,000 citations on Google Scholar.[6]


AIMA is intended for an undergraduate audience but can also be used for graduate-level studies with the suggestion of adding some of the primary sources listed in the extensive bibliography.[citation needed]


AIMA gives detailed information about the working of algorithms in AI. The book's chapters span from classical AI topics like searching algorithms and first-order logic, propositional logic and probabilistic reasoning to advanced topics such as multi-agent systems, constraint satisfaction problems, optimization problems, artificial neural networks, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and computer vision.[7]


The authors provide a GitHub repository with implementations of various exercises and algorithms from the book in different programming languages.[7][8] Programs in the book are presented in pseudo code with implementations in Java, Python, Lisp, JavaScript, and Scala available online.[8]


Various editions have been translated from the original English into several languages, including at least Chinese, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Romanian, Russian, and Serbian. However, the latest, 4th edition is available only in English, French,[9] and Italian.[citation needed]


My original research area was theoretical computer science, with a focus on automata and formal languages. I was later a member of the team that built Mothra, a pioneering software testing system based on the idea of program mutation.


For the last thirty years, my specialty has been programming languages. I have written three books about languages: C Programming: A Modern Approach, Java Programming: From the Beginning, and Modula-2: A Complete Guide. The first edition of C Programming: A Modern Approach, published in 1996, went through 17 printings before being replaced by the second edition in 2008. C Programming: A Modern Approach is widely used by universities in North America and abroad and has been translated into Chinese, Italian, and Polish.


I also have a strong interest in computer science education. My 1997 paper, "The Case for Java as a First Language," was one of the first to argue that Java should become the primary language for teaching introductory programming. In 2008, I obtained funding from the Institute for Personal Robots in Education to introduce personal robots into CSc 2010 (Introduction to Computer Science).

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages