On Apr 19, 10:09 pm, "Jens Wilkinson" <
jenswilkin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Larry <
larrysu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1) ke-wela pakai's haifen ("-") ma? bifo "pela" ("pa" po fupi-umbo)
> > lekin no bifo "di"?
>
> Ta aca di duman. Ke-po mi suka pakai "haifen"? Mi yau pakai haifen po
> "tomo-kalim" (compound words). Ta wan pela kalim, lekin po pakai
> kalim-kitabu, mesti gani do pela lado. Kapice? Mi pensa no fasil. OK. Mi
> duman: "wan-pela", ta wan pela kalim? Ta do pela kalim? Mi no sabe. Ako ta
> do pela kalim, mi pensa OK no pakai haifen.
>
> Sama di duman. Do-deka-san (23), ta wan pela kalim? San pela kalim? Yu pensa
> ke?
>
mi pensa's "pela"/"pa", ta tuti-kalim ("marker word, particle word"),
pwi no pakai's haifen. "do-deka-san", ta tomo-kalim, pwi pakai's
haifen.
("pwi" = "then, therefore", po Fahanse-lida.)
>
> > 2) seda po *"kie" mo *"kye", ta sama's?
>
> Ya, mi pensa ta sama. Lekin, "kiye", ta no sama.
>
oke, mi kapice's. mi yau's pakai's "CyV" daiti's "CiV", mo "CwV"
daiti's "CuV".
aca di din po yu....
--Larry
neo-patwa-toronto.blogspot.com