All the best
DIETER
http://www.nocrotec.com/
Looks like a fantastic design, I especially like the fact it's direct
drive. No more ringing tubes!
But there doesn't seem to be any way to order it. There's no option to add
to cart, and price is "0,00 EUR".
-Dan
> Unfortunately, spending $850 on a IN-18 clock is outside of my realm.
Check your maths....
US$197.98 + US$470.67 = US$668.65
It looks like you have calculated something wrong. (maybe incl VAT?!?!?)
> PS. Had issues trying to actually get pricing through the website. When
> I look for clock, it shows cost of $0.00. Even reselected US dollar.
> Added to cart.
No no. Where you were is the information site only.
scroll down and read how to get the right parts.
You need to order from me:
http://snipurl.com/2248nvp
and from claus:
http://snipurl.com/2248o3k
Very easy - try again.
Dieter
> But there doesn't seem to be any way to order it. There's no option to add
> to cart, and price is "0,00 EUR".
Where you were is the information site only.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.
----- Original Message -----From: Mich...@aol.comSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:31 PMSubject: Re: [neonixie-l] IN-18 Blue Dream Nixie Clock available now!!!
How does it stack up against the fantastic DL1 ?
--
personally I think that the "IN-18 Blue Dream" and the "Sven" Nixie
clocks cannot be compared, for several reasons:
First, you already mentioned the IN-18 tubes, they are much more costy.
But this also poses a technological problem: While it is rather easy to
supply 12mA = 6 * 2mA for IN-14 tubes, IN-18 tubes are much more power
hungry. You cannot buy those SMPSs on Ebay (if you want your tube clock
to be quiet, that is).
Secondly, I think a stainless steel housing is much more expensive in
the making than laser-cut acrylic. Read the description, the surface
finish was developed exclusively for those clocks - I can only imagine
that this took quite some time to work out.
Also, Dieter's clock is battery buffered (we are talking about 10 years
here) and I did not see if "Sven" also is. For me, this will always be
the key argument for or against a clock. I do not like reprogramming a
clock every morning at the office when I turned it off the other evening.
I am not a clock-expert, I merely collect tubes, so I cannot really put
a price on clocks since I do not purchase them :-) All I can say is that
these two clocks are very different in their appearance and aim at quite
different buyers.
Best regards,
Jens
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to neonixie-l+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> I'd have to disagree with you there Dieter, nothing wrong with acrylic
> cases for IN-18 clocks..
>
>
> It wasn't cheap or easy to do either....;-)
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Dieter Waechter <i...@nocrotec.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yes that's right.
> > Note the protopype cases cost about 1000 EUR, the other parts, equipment,
> > programming, tools, about 4500 EUR.
> > I know that a acrylic case is fast, cheap and very easy to do.
> > But I reall NEVER would pack a IN-18 clock in a plastic case.
> > Dieter
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucky" <dave.lucky.po...@gmail.com>
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to neonixie-l+unsubscribe@**
> > googlegroups.com <neonixie-l%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/**
> > group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB<http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB>
> > .
Uggh!
Sorry Nick, no disrespect intended.
That closed plastic coffin thing has been done to death.
I'd even produced something similar nine years ago with the GPSII in
all acrylic.
And while I'm on the rant; the techs who re-purpose those plastic
baseball boxes and little heirloom domes for a nixie clock cover are
in need of serious help ;)
Although I concurr that Dieters work is pricey amongst the herd, he's
shown the best packaging ingenuity of the lot. Spanning the market
evolution since '04. In spite of that high cost, he obviously moves a
lot of these.
And the audiophools love a shiney blinkin' nixie display above their
shrine to thermionic emission, that requires cotton gloves to fondle.
Regards, Jeff
The folks who repurpose baseball and heirloom domes for their clocks
fall into a separate category of their own ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
> I'd have to disagree with you there Dieter, nothing wrong with acrylic
> cases for IN-18 clocks..
>
>
> It wasn't cheap or easy to do either....;-)
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Dieter Waechter <i...@nocrotec.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yes that's right.
> > Note the protopype cases cost about 1000 EUR, the other parts, equipment,
> > programming, tools, about 4500 EUR.
> > I know that a acrylic case is fast, cheap and very easy to do.
> > But I reall NEVER would pack a IN-18 clock in a plastic case.
> > Dieter
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucky" <dave.lucky.po...@gmail.com>
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to neonixie-l+unsubscribe@**
> > googlegroups.com <neonixie-l%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/**
> > group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB<http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB>
> > .
Uggh!
Sorry Nick, no disrespect intended.
That closed plastic coffin thing has been done to death.
I'd even produced something similar nine years ago with the GPSII in
all acrylic.
And while I'm on the rant; the techs who re-purpose those plastic
baseball boxes and little heirloom domes for a nixie clock cover are
in need of serious help ;)
Although I concurr that Dieters work is pricey amongst the herd, he's
shown the best packaging ingenuity of the lot. Spanning the market
evolution since '04. In spite of that high cost, he obviously moves a
lot of these.
And the audiophools love a shiney blinkin' nixie display above their
shrine to thermionic emission, that requires cotton gloves to fondle.
Regards, Jeff
The folks who repurpose baseball and heirloom domes for their clocks
fall into a separate category of their own ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
Those are rock solid supplies, too. Our own jt makes them. As far as I'm concerned, they're unbeatable for the size and price.
- John
> I just came across this one Jens, you might be interested in it. A
> very tiny and cheap 180V power supply delivering 64mA. You could drive
> 10 of these IN-18 tubes.
yes, I know it, that is why I wrote "(if you want your tube clock to be
quiet, that is)". ;-)
Jens
Jens
> And while I'm on the rant; the techs who re-purpose those plastic
> baseball boxes and little heirloom domes for a nixie clock cover
> are in need of serious help ;)
Thank you for offering Jeff, because in the UK I cannot find those
baseball boxes at a sensible price anywhere here and I sure could use
some help sourcing some cheapies. So good of you to offer. Mind you
I've not seen one in the flesh. Are they horrible styrene jobbies
with visible seam lines?
Sometimes I think it's all a matter of not what you have but how you
use it. It so happens I need some good acrylic cubes. These used to
be sold as cube picture frames, but it seems that craze ended in the
1970s. I have a few, but they are a bit big and I don't like the
quality so much. I like the chunky acrylic boxes MUJI do but nothing
they sell is quite right for a nixie clock. The quality is good and
they don't have that awful 3 degree release angle that just says
'cheap tacky injection moulded box'.
Heirloom doom, I mean dome, also appeals to me for some ideas. I
found some at a sale with horrible glass 'planes in them, which I
dremelled off as they were welded onto the top of the glass dome. Yet
to build a light-up clock inside them, but one day I might.
Generally I agree with you, a rectangular slab of whatever, whether
it be high grade machined whatever or expensive whatever, with six
tubes poking out of it does not float my boat, but some people like
and expect that so I am sure that approach remains very popular.
Personally I want to get into more organic shaped housings, but I
cannot yet afford either to have them made by Shapeways or to build a
decent enough RepRap machine to squirt them out myself. So I am
thinking scratch-build, elbow-grease, traditional plaster or silicone
moulds, GRP and other highly toxic methods.
I have Catmull-Clark subdivision surface 3D computer modelling down
to a fine art now, so I am waiting until the output technology and I
can meet somewhere where I can afford to interface with it. On my
deathbed probably.
Generally it is all good fun and nixies look so great they are a
wonder to behold, just wire those Doreens up and enjoy them. They
don't do a lot just sitting in a box and you might be dead next week.
John S