> A lot of the old scope circuits used to run the cathode at a negative
> voltage. (this required a well insulated filament transformer.) but
> meant that the defection plates were almost at ground potential.
>
> Yes, If I ever made a real circuit, to use them, I would use the negative cathode voltage approach. But the heater/filament has to be close to the cathode voltage. Less than 100V off. For the simple test circuit, a high positive voltage was just more convenient. Deflection test, is just done by clipping on a test lead, and connecting the individual deflection plates to +1800V or +1400V. It's quick-n-dirty.
Thanks for posting the schematic! Any suggestions on inductors?
> If you use the negative cathode voltage, then the heater has to have a filament winding that's galvanically isolated from every other supply, except maybe the cathode. The secondary and primary need to have some very good separation, such as a split bobbin transformer. Not a problem back in the old days of analog scopes. They had transformers made just for this purpose.
After some poking around, I settled on the Hammond 183F12 for floating the heater at a high negative voltage. It's isolated to 4000V, which is plenty for the
CRTs (and monoscope) I'm playing with.
- John