Issue 221 in neologism: typos in description part

0 views
Skip to first unread message

neol...@googlecode.com

unread,
Apr 25, 2013, 7:55:57 AM4/25/13
to neologis...@googlegroups.com
Status: New
Owner: ----

New issue 221 by kschmidt...@web.de: typos in description part
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=221

I found some typos in the heading description part of an ontology.

The ontology is invalid at:

1. dcterms:partOf -> dcterms:isPartOf
2. There is no dcterms:status. Maybe <http://purl.org/adms/status/1.0> is
the right one.

Thanks


--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

neol...@googlecode.com

unread,
Sep 20, 2013, 11:58:00 AM9/20/13
to neologis...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Accepted

Comment #1 on issue 221 by richard....@gmail.com: typos in description part
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=221

These were introduced with the ADMS support. The second is indeed supposed
to be adms:status (which is used elsewhere in the RDF output). The VoID
vocabulary at http://vocab.deri.ie/void.ttl is an example of a fairly
high-profile vocabulary that suffers from these bugs as it is hosted on a
Neologism instance.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages