Issue 112 in neologism: Ability to add custom RDF triples to the RDF/XML and N3 output

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Status: Accepted
Owner: rich...@cyganiak.de
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Critical Milestone-v1.1
Component-RDFOutput

New issue 112 by rich...@cyganiak.de: Ability to add custom RDF triples to
the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

In many scenarios, users might want to have some extra RDF in the output,
for example,
instances, or status annotations for terms, or OWL constructs that are not
supported by
Neologism. Adding support for all these things will be hard. A good
compromise might be to
have support for adding custom triples to the RDF output.

There would be a field “Additional custom RDF” in the Vocabulary Editor.
This would be in a
collapsed section by default. You can put any N3 code in there. Some common
prefixes should
be pre-defined to save time, most of all the vocabulary's own prefix. The
base URI should be the
URI of the vocabulary document (that is, the empty relative URI <> expands
to <http://my-
neologism/myvocab>).

If the vocabulary's N3 or RDF/XML is viewed, and the custom RDF field is
not empty, then the
content of that field will be parsed with an N3 parser and loaded into the
model that is used to
generate the N3 or RDF/XML output. So the additional triples will show up
when the model is
rendered.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Started

Comment #1 on issue 112 by rich...@cyganiak.de: Ability to add custom RDF

triples to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

Update: There is a form element for this now in the vocab form, and the
contents of that field are stored, but it's
not yet put into the RDF output.

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Comment #2 on issue 112 by wik...@wikier.org: Ability to add custom RDF

triples to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

What's the real state of this feature? If it'd be necessary, I think I can
help on the RDF output.

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Comment #3 on issue 112 by guidocecilio: Ability to add custom RDF triples

to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

The activity of the project was reduced for the last five months, but it
has started again and this feature will be added soon. Thanks anyway to
those that want to contribute to this project in some way.

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Comment #4 on issue 112 by wik...@wikier.org: Ability to add custom RDF

triples to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

I was taking a look on the code about the RDF output. It changed a little
bit since the original version that I wrote, but not so much for find where
to finnish the implementation of this feature
(http://code.google.com/p/neologism/source/browse/trunk/neologism/neologism.module#932).

Guido, if you don't plan to implement it in the following days/weeks,
please tell me and I'll take care on it.

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Comment #5 on issue 112 by guidocecilio: Ability to add custom RDF triples

to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

Next Monday I will be discussing the scalability problem of Neologism with
Richard and also the inclusion of the parse to finish with this issue. If
you look carefully in the vocabulary edition form you will see
the "Additional custom RDF" field is already there, so it is just to parse
this input and add it to the output. Thus, I think it gonna be ready for
this week.

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Comment #7 on issue 112 by rich...@cyganiak.de: Ability to add custom RDF

triples to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

Issue 140 has been merged into this issue.

[neol...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #8 on issue 112 by guidocec...@gmail.com: Ability to add custom RDF

triples to the RDF/XML and N3 output
http://code.google.com/p/neologism/issues/detail?id=112

This feature is already added and will be include in the release 0.5.