Virtualcol Msfs

[Gwenda Arguin]

Weare proud to present our secondproduct for MSFS. This time is taking care of the details andfunctionality to the maximum allowed by Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020. Likeothers we developed, this product keeps beginners and flight simmers inmind. However, it fulfills our policies for basic standards, and its pricemakes it very affordable for all customers. THIS IS NOT A STUDY-LEVEL PRODUCT!This time, we deliver three models, ERJ170, ERJ175, and ERJ175, with Wingletsextended and 30 repaints in UHD format to avoid losing details. The followingrepaints are included with our package:

All searching for our product can beused under Asobo standards (we are thankful for their collaboration) to avoiderrors on our part. If some error exists in displays or systems, thesewould be fixed by Asobo in updates. Please report these in the MSFSforums.

We created videos with instructions atthis time, as we are not issuing a USER MANUAL. These videos are published herein this store and are available on our website by navigating the menuPRODUCTS->TUTORIALS. For other concerns, please contact us at ouremail sup...@virtualcol.com.

WARNING: As there are included videos with functionality, sound, details, cockpit, and exterior, we ask that you see them before purchasing. All information provided is here. NO REFUNDS GIVEN! Please refrain from contacting us for these requests, as they will not be attended to. If the product presents an error, it will be solved by updates. However, it has been sufficiently tested to confirm that if there are errors, these will be minimal. Please contact our support by email at sup...@virtualcol.com and send your case so we can help you.

You didn't even provide a source for this whole thread topic, that Virualcol have stopped developing the A220 for MSFS. I can't even find an article or source that says Virtualcol even started development of the A220 for MSFS. When I Google "Virtualcol a220 msfs" in Google, I also get no results: =Virtualcol+A220+msfs

Virtualcol EJet came out over a year prior to the FSS EJet, and the FSS EJet is not only unfinished, but currently looks like it will never be finished. Been several months now and they just now got a custom AT system in, but it still doesn't have thrust ratings? There would be a very good argument for an enhancement pack, just like there would have been for the last year with no other payware Embraers announced.

No this place is pretty typical in agreement. I didnt expect anyone to agree. I liked Imaginesim sceneries too and pretty much most would say they didnt. I just appreciate choices. But ill reiterate from a business standpoint for Vcol it really doesnt make a ton of sense to cancel the project. Even someone like me who will probably never buy the FSS175 I would certainly look their way before I bought Virtualcols 175 so it is strange to see them still developing a CRJ and E190. People can talk all they want but the plane would have sold

To compare the Virtualcol EJet to the FFS plane, even in its unfinished state, is ridiculous. Have you actually tried the ghastly Virtualcol offering? The FFS plane is now in a reasonable state and is perfectly flyable.

FSS is nowhere near finished. It's basically pre-alpha in its current state. Entire feature sets that would have been understood as standard for P3D (and were featured in the Feelthere Embraer going back... over ten years ago now) were just entirely left out, with the devs even claiming that VNAV just wasn't used in the real world. Absurd to say the least, and a cash grab.

So wait... you don't buy their products, but you're upset this notoriously very low quality company that has been selling the same FS9 quality level models for the past ten years, and is a well known commodity in the community, is not producing an MS Paint fidelity level model of an aircraft with the most complicated avionics package in commercial aviation today?

Don't buy the FFS plane then. For my part I'm more than happy with the progress that has been made so far. If I can't twiddle a circuit breaker so be it because I never would anyway. Nor any other system I wouldn't use getting from A to B in the simplest way possible,

Where did I say I dont buy their products? And where id I say I was upset about them selling lower level models? Like what the actual? lmao Get a life. But sure i guess it does come off as flamebait to all the armchair captains that need everyplane to be studylevel like yourself lurking the forums

Some basic fidelity on the avionics. Thrust modes, VNAV doesn't even have to be perfect, just okay. And rip out the Asobo LNAV module, because it's trash and the only improvements have come from WT/FBW - the default LNAV code is still hopelessly broken. I'd love to have working autotune, What-If mode would be nice but again, it's fine if it's not in their scope.

These are not absurd requests. This would be absolutely standard in any addon for $30 released for P3D, especially when they were transparent in their marketing that they'll be charging more. "It's the simplest plane I've ever flown" is not a selling point, because the airplane itself is not simple.

3a8082e126