Problem with the Jews Is Not the Culture of Critique but Culture of Subversion

[Gorse McDaniel]

The social psychologist Kevin MacDonald argues that Jews pose a
problem to gentile majorities through the Culture of Critique. There
is indeed a COC at the core of modern Jewish culture, but that isn’
the main problem. Problem is not Critique but Subversion, for
Critique can be positive and even necessary for the health, survival,
and regeneration of a community.

It is critique that allows people to understand themselves and their
societies. To ponder what works and what doesn’t. Critique isn’t the
same as criticism or condemnation. It is a penetrating analysis of
ideas, values, or conditions to understand them better. Better
understanding can lead to reform and progress or better and more
intelligent reasons for holding onto one’s ideas and values. Crucial
to Western Civilization have been change and progress, and neither
would have been possible without the practice of critique. All high
cultures have some degree of culture of critique, but the West took it
the furthest, which explains why the West advanced the most. The West
was never fully content or -centric in their Western-ness. Westerners
always wanted to know more, understand better, fix the bugs in the
system, come up with new paradigms, come up with better
justifications, etc. Hindus had their rigid caste-bound religious
system. Muslims were content with their Islamo-centric view of the
world, which is why their world never experienced the Renaissance. The
Chinese became arrogant and enclosed in concept of the Middle Kingdom.
From the very beginning, the West was different, and this difference
must be credited largely to the Greeks(who originated the Culture of
Critique) and white genetics. If Asian genes favor submission/
obedience and if black genes favor wildness/chaos, the whites genes
lie somewhere in between–a balance of order and chaos. If there’s too
much order, progress is slowed by rigid dogmatism and subservience. If
there is too much chaos, progress is made impossible by violence and
mayhem. The West had its historical and social share of oppression and
violence, but the core consciousness and heart of Western Man have
been somewhere between order and chaos. This explains why, even after
the greatest war that ever was(WWII of course), Europe recovered
rapidly.
Under ideal conditions, nothing can beat the West. It also explains
why the West has long generated change and progress from within. Asia
has achieved much progress in the 20th century, but how many of the
ideas that changed Asia actually came from Asia itself? Almost all of
the ideas–scientific, political, economic, etc–came from the West to
the East. If the East ceased to exist, change would still occur in the
West. But, if the West ceased to exist, change in Asia would slow
down, and Asia would slowly revert back to its ‘feudal’ mentality.


Critique, for this reason, is generally good. Critique can be negative
or positive, corrosive or constructive, made in bad faith or good
faith. Critique in and of itself is not the problem. Indeed, it must
be said that much of Jewish COC has been good. Not all Jewish
intellectuals have been crazy radicals or hateful subversives.
Indeed, Kevin MacDonald is also a practitioner of the COC–and admits
as much–because he approaches Jewish culture, history, and ideas in
the way many Jewish intellectuals have approached gentile societies.
There is nothing wrong with a people critiquing other societies,
cultures, ideas, or values. And, there’s nothing inherently wrong with
critiquing one’s own society, values, history, and so on. Indeed, the
Right wouldn’t be in such a sorry intellectual and cultural state if
it had practiced more of the Culture of Critique on itself. Without
constant critiquing, ideas and values grow stale(or phenomenon such as
Rush Limbaugh or idle questions like ‘Gee, what would
Reagan do?’). Critiquing doesn’t necessarily mean an assault or
rejection of traditional ideas. It simply means looking at them from
new angles and perspectives, reconsidering them, understanding them
better, and finding new arguments for or against them. Only through
constant critique can we keep our ideas and values fresh. Regularly
inspecting a restaurant or one’s car is a good thing. Constantly
checking and cleaning the parts of a gun is essential too. We don’t
just want to have blind faith in our culture, ideas, values, etc. We
want to take it apart, study them, see why they are dear to us, why
they’ve worked for us, why they’ve failed us sometimes, why some of it
must be preserved and improved, why some of it must be discarded, and
so on. No set of social ideas or values are fool-proof, perfect, or
infallible. All have bugs and defects or disadvantages. Only through
the Culture of Critique can we properly understand them, fix them, or
revitalize them–and keep doing so in a never ending tune up of the
system. Muslims don’t practice a COC, and look what’s happened to
them in contrast to the West or Israel. Muslims and Arabs generally
have trust in Islam or in their Tough Guy Leader; they don’t ask too
many questions. It’s no wonder that Israel is mightier than all of
the Islamic Middle East combined. Jews examine, analyze, and reform
their own societies. Muslims don’t.


So, why are Jews problematic to us? It’s not the COC but COS(culture
of subversion). Much of Jewish critique has been subversive than
constructive, deviously toxic than helpful in a good-willed manner.
They’ve been analyzing, criticizing, studying, examining, and
experimenting with us to weaken us and bring us down than to save or
empower us. Of course, this cannot be said of all Jews or even most
Jews. But, it’s true enough that a sizable number of Jews have been
involved in the most radical and hateful ideologies and movements in
modern times, and these hostile Jews have often been the most
influential elements of the Jewish community. Why is Jewish critique
different from that of others? Why has it been so subversive to the
majority culture?


Possibly, the answer can be found in the fact that Jews have been a
nomadic people–a minority in foreign lands; they were ‘rootless’.
Also, Jews are smart and have had a tendency to look down on gentiles
in the way that humans look down on apes or sheep. Also, the nature of
Jewish economic life–money lending, tax collecting, middlemen
professions, etc–made Jews very distrustful of goyim who were, in
turn, distrustful of the Jews. Also, Jews were not a physically strong
or warrior-like people; since they couldn’t fight and win with brawn,
they had to rely on brains–especially since they were outnumbered by
the goyim. Also, there was something in Jewish religion and culture
which instilled Jews with a sense of superiority toward others. The
Jewish Book told the Jews that there is only one God and that Jews are
the chosen people of God. So, Jews always felt a certain degree of
frustration. On the one hand, their Holy Book said their God is the
ONLY true god and that Jews are God’s favorite people. But, Jews were
often in foreign lands dealing with hostile people who had power of
life and death over them. Of course, to the goyim, Jews often seemed
the hostile minority. So, Jewish COC developed in opposition to the
goy majority culture.


Many Jews, especially modern Jews, had great respect of goy culture
and wanted to become a part of it. Many Jews assimilated into
Christian or gentile society in the late 19th and early 20th century.
But, many did not. And, even the many Jews who did assimilated or
tried to assimilate kept and practiced the Jewish impulse to undermine
and bring down the goy order. (It was a psycho-structural trait so
deeply ingrained throughout Jewish history that even modern and
secular Jews could not dispense with it; some modern Jews were aware
of it and even proud of it; they relished their role as ‘special’
radicals fooling the stupid goy masses. Other Jews thought themselves
completely assimilated and weren’t conscious of the buried Jewish
structural mentality impelling them to act in radical and subversive
ways; they sincerely understood their radicalism as mere progressivism
to improve the lot of mankind, but in truth, it was a case of old
Jewish habits trying to undermine the goy order and gain power for the
Jewish kind, though modern Jewish power was disguised as ‘socialism’,
‘communism’, ‘anarchism’, ‘bohemianism’, or ‘finance capitalism’.
Jews who knew about the animating spirit beneath the veneer of the
secular, modern, or ‘assimilated’ Jew were acting venal; the Jews who
were unaware of the Jewish spirit that really commanded their
radicalism were naive and idealistic. But, their aims as far as white
goy society was concerned were one and the same.) So, even Jewish
converts to Christianity or secularism turned to ideologies like
Marxism, decadent bohemianism, anarchism, and other such ideas,
fashions, and movements in greater numbers(proportionally anyway)than
gentiles did.


It could be argued that the COC actually began as a full-blown
philosophical or scientific approach with the Ancient Greeks. Consider
people like Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and countless others who
sought to question, analyze, discuss, argue about, and understand
everything. Socrates challenged all assumptions, raised all manner of
questions, and didn’t think any topic or issue was so sacred or holy
as to be left untouched or accepted on faith. So, COC originated with
non-Jewish Hellenic folks than with the Jews.
To be sure, there was an element of COC in Judaism too. How could this
be when Judaism is all about believing in God and obeying Him? After
all, Adam and Eve disobeyed God and sought Knowledge and got punished
badly. The fall of the Garden of the Eden is the greatest tragedy in
the Bible. Bible emphasizes the need to obey God, to submit to this
commands, and so on. So, how could Judaism have inspired Critique?
Actually, it was more a semi-culture-of-critique but it was critique
enough. Jewish tradition and culture spawned critique because God was
said to be perfect and all-powerful. In other words, there were
Utopian or perfectionist elements in the Bible. Of course, many
cultures had stories about the Age of Gold and all that, but only the
Jewish religion said God is All-Knowing, All-Perfect, and All-True.
The Jewish Book said there is only one God and no other. And, the Only
God is the Perfect Being. And, Jews are his favorite people. So,
what’s the problem? Jews couldn’t have but realized 24/7 that the
world was far from perfect, and they themselves were far from being
the happiest or the most powerful people in the world. If there is
only one God and if he’s Good and Perfect, why is the world so
rotten? And, if Jews are His favorite people, how come Jews suffer
along with the rest of mankind–or suffer worse at some times,
especially at the hands of filthy goyim? It was this concept of
Perfection which led Jews to question the world, man, morality,
history, and etc. Of course, the Jews could NOT question or critique
God himself(at least not directly), but they could question,
criticize, scrutinize, and examine mankind and the world to find the
bugs in the system(which was a rather indirect or devious to critique
God in a roundabout way; it may be another reason why Jews became so
devious; unable to question or attack God directly, they had to find
ways that were reverent towards God yet were actually complaints.
Notice that the God becomes more distant from and less powerful over
the lives of people as the Bible progresses. Even as each Biblical
text pays ever greater respect to God as a Being of Supreme
Perfection, God’s power over mankind grows weaker... to the point
where the Hebrews seem to be on their own and in control of their own
destiny. Ironically, the more Jews turned God into a more perfect,
abstract, and infallible being, the less God became relevant over the
lives of the Hebrews and other humans. Since God was said to be
perfect, it became ever more necessary to divorce him from the world
which was imperfect. Similarly, the more that radical and liberal
Jews idealize the United States or Western Society in utopian terms,
the more the original creators/inhabitants/settlers [white folks] lose
their power. Since the Modern West is supposed to be perfect in
justice and equality, and since white people are tainted with
‘historical sins’, it’s necessary to divorce the Modern West from
White Power; the Highest Hope of the West cannot be achieved or
attained by white people who’ve lost their moral authority. In other
words, The West [and all the great things it stands for] is too good
for original Western Man. Just as Perfect God had to be divorced from
the Imperfect World, the Perfect Future of the West must be divorced
from the Imperfect Record of Tainted White Folks. The future of the
West is to be determined not by whites but mainly by Jews and blacks,
who are said to be the rightful moral heirs to Western power and
wealth since they suffered at the hands of White Folks and carry no
historical guilt whatsoever themselves. If the West is a Christian
Civilization, and if Christianity is about nobility of victims, then
it’s only right that the West should fall into the hands of Jews and
blacks, the main victims of White Folks.)


Socrates and the Greeks went further in the Culture of Critique than
the Jews did because the Greeks went all out and critiqued even the
sacred religious principles of their society. The nature of Jewish
culture being what it was, Jews could not dare criticize God. Indeed,
to even say God’s name was punishable by stoning. But, because their
God was supposed to be perfect, Jews had to wonder why the world
failed to live up to God’s ideal and vision? It couldn’t be God’s
fault. In the Bible, prophets appear and ‘critique’–judge, extol,
threaten, analyze, pontificate, etc–the world around them. Prophets
sometimes blame the goyim for standing in the way of the Jews, God’s
chosen people. But, the prophets sometimes attack the Jews for having
drifted away from the laws and values given to them by God. So, there
has long been an element of self-criticism is Jewish culture as well.
Jesus was the greatest COC-ist in Western religious tradition. We
don’t know what the REAL Jesus was like, but the Jesus of mythology
didn’t merely try to bring forth paradise for the Jews but for ALL
MANKIND. As such, he became Jew who transmitted Jewish moral and
religious tradition to the goy kind. Anyway, Jewish critique always
had a utopian, radical, or totalitarian underpinning; and, it tended
to be morally judgmental because of its religious roots. Jewish
critique wasn’t merely a means to understand reality and society
better but to CHANGE THE WORLD–as Karl Marx said of philosophy. Since
Jews had to serve God and realize God’s promises and commands on
Earth, their philosophy could not be about ‘idle’ or merely academic/
theoretical matters. They had to serve a grand purpose. This may
explain why Marxism became what it did. Though Marxism rejected God
and was supposedly a science, there was the quasi-Biblical aura that
Marx had figured it all out, he was all-knowing, and his ideas/dogmas
only needed to be obeyed and followed–or forced if necessary. Though
there have been Marxist critics who’ve been critical of Marx or used
his theories selectively for understanding certain social phenomena,
the central thrust of the Marxist movements all over the world was
that MARX HAD IT RIGHT AND IT’S THE DUTY OF MAN TO MAKE THE ENTIRE
WORLD COMMUNIST ACCORDING TO MARX’S DICTATES. This was Culture of
Critique as Culture of Confrontation. Not even the French Revolution–
led by goyim–was this extreme or radical.


To be sure, there have been two kinds of Jewish subversives: the
idealists and the individualists. The Jewish idealist subversives
seek to undermine the status quo(especially that of the goy majority)
for the sake of creating a just utopia for all mankind(but especially
beneficial and empowering to Jews who will gain most power in the new
order favoring intellectuals and radicals). Karl Marx, Trotsky, and
Chomsky belong in the idealist Jewish subversive camp. This type of
people seek to tear down society to build a new one, one they believe
to be better for all of mankind(though especially for the Jews).


The individualist Jewish kind, in contrast, are generally anti-utopian
and anti-totalitarian, but they can be dangerous too. Though
conservative goyim often embrace the anti-totalitarian Jewish
individualists, the latter can be corrosive and damaging to the moral
fabric and fiber of the community. Think of Howard Stern, Sarah
Silverman, Alan Dershowitz, Sandra Bernhardt, Woody Allen, Ron Jeremy
and other Porn Meisters, and so on. NOTHING is sacred to these people–
though talented they may be in terms of wit and entertainment value.
Libertarians may love such people for what they stand against
(political correctness), but what are these individualist-subversive
Jews FOR? Certainly not for values that we embrace and hold dear.
Their values tend to be actually ‘liberal’–miscegenation, open
borders, gay marriage, and etc. And, think of that monster Ayn
Rand. Many goyim worship her as some kind of goddess(and she was a
uniquely gifted novelist; we must give credit where it’s due), but
she was a monster whose cartoon idea of America–money grubbing titans
of capitalism–really insults us. True, she was opposed to the
totalitarianism of the state, but she was for the totalitarianism of
the individual(or, at least that of the SUPERIOR individual). Most
people are not giants, geniuses, or titans. The idea of conservative
Americans reading her books and thinking they are in the same league
as the Big Rich Guys and Geniuses is laughable. Also, just look at the
Big Titans of our society: George Soros, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett,
Donald Trump, the Walton family, etc. Congrats to their mega-wealth,
but are they better or superior to us in anything other than
moneymaking, techno smarts, financial trickery, or having the luck of
growing up rich?
So, we must keep in mind that Jewish individualist subversion can also
be damaging to our society. Of course, this is difficult for many
people to grasp because the media are owned by Jews and tell us that
Jews only do good for society(and that all people MUST love some Jews;
so, if you don’t like commie Jews, you MUST prove that you’re not
antisemitic by showing that you just LOVE Jews such as Ayn Rand,
Milton Friedman, or Alan Dershowitz).
Also, subversive individualist Jews happen to be very witty, funny,
and entertaining. We have a hard time believing that someone that
makes us laugh can be bad for us. But, when these subversive
individualist Jews mock and make us laugh at the very values and ideas
that have been most dear and precious to us, we need to come to our
senses and see the danger. No, I’m not for censorship or turning off
the TV. It’s okay to find entertainment or a good laugh anywhere, but
we must always remind ourselves that no amount of snarky wit or nasty
humor invalidates the values and beliefs that have been crucial to our
survival as a people, race, and nation. Go ahead and laugh, but don’t
confuse laughter with truth or wisdom; after all one can even crack
jokes about the Holocaust or someone’s funeral, but the joke doesn’t
alter the true nature of such matters.


At any rate, both the idealist Jews and individual Jews tended to see
the vast goy society as an obstacle to their agenda or absolute
freedom. Radical subversive idealist Jews wanted to undermine and
destroy goy institutions/icons to set up a new order based on higher
justice and truth(as mostly developed by Jewish thinkers). Crazy
subversive individualist Jews wanted to undermine and destroy goy
institutions and icons to expand anarchic freedom whereby the clever
individual(generally the Jew) would have advantage over the goyim. In
a totally individualist society unmoored by social or traditional
norms, the smartest and the wittiest come out on top; the hustler or
the wheeler-dealer becomes numero uno. Radical intellectual Jews
sought power through violent revolution, and crazy individual Jews
sought power through anarchic freedom. Though ideologically at odds,
both sides have complemented each other at times. Notice how the
leftist intellectual Jews–those for big government, political
correctness, socialism, etc–got together with the individualist Jews–
Hollywood, music industry, TV, defense lawyers, computer industry, etc–
to put Obama in power. The Jews mastered the Art of the Schvartze.
Obama is the compromise between the radical Jews and the individualist
Jews. Obama as the first black president undermines white American
power and values, opening up to new anarchic possibilities. Obama as
the socialist promises big government for left-wing intellectuals.
Obama as a globalist will allow the economic elite to keep making
their fortunes around the world. Obama the Progressive is the face of
Socialist Idealism. Obama the Hipster is appealing to the crazy
individualist Jews. Obama is a man of many faces, and he has a few
faces that appeals to many goyim as well. His image as The One has won
the hearts and minds of many white Christians who are suckers for
religious iconography.


Anyway, the Greek Culture of Critique was different from the Jewish
Culture of Critique. Though the ideas of Socrates and other Greek
thinkers were considered subversive by some quarters of Greek society,
all Greek philosophers were also proud Greeks and thus committed to
the power, wealth, and success of Greek society. So, whether their
ideas were ultimately good or bad, they sought to serve the Greek
state, Greek people, Greek power, or Greek something. A Greek
philosopher may have been eccentric and stood apart from others, but
he too was part of the Greek order. He may have come up with some bad
or radical ideas, but he was not a hostile outsider. He was to the
Greeks what the Jewish prophets were to the Jews. He could be
critical and harsh, but his critique was to serve or save the Greek
order than to destroy it. He could be very wrong, and his ideas could
be damaging, but he acted in good faith. Similarly, Jewish prophets
acted in good faith in relation to their own kind.


But, Jewish critique and advice to the goy kind were not made in good
faith. Those were merely devious means by which Jews could gain
advantage for themselves. Pretending to serve others while really
serving oneself is no great sin. All peoples have done this, and the
foreign policy of most countries still function on this level. All
nations disguise their policy of national self-interest in the
language of international morality and humanitarian principles. Where
Jews were unique was that they didn’t have a country of their own, and
the scattered populations of Jews developed social relationships that
were fundamentally devious. Since Jews were minorities in all places,
they had to act as though they were always serving the interests of
the goyim though they were actually looking out for themselves. (To be
sure, Greeks and Armenians acted the same way under the Turks, but
Greeks and Armenians were content to keep to themselves other than in
economic matters. There was something in the Jewish genes–higher
intelligence, a more restless disposition, a strange way of seeing the
world, a powerful will, a cunning temperament, etc–that propelled them
to seek something more than favors and wealth from their relations
with other peoples. Jews wanted to gain total mastery over the goy
majority either violently through communist revolution or gradually
through capitalist accumulation–and media dissemination. Perhaps,
this was because Greeks and Armenians could one day look toward their
own national territory and independence. Since this option was not
possible for Jews–at least not in the heart of Europe–, Jews were
condemned to exist only as minorities in foreign lands. Since they
could not be total masters of their own land, they sought to be
masters of Ideas, Wealth, and Cultural Power. Those three forces would
also come to command politics since political power in a capitalist
democratic country derives mainly from money and media. Democracy is
about the people, but the people think and feel as they are told by
schools and the media. So, those who control the media in effect
control the politics since politicians have to play to the emotions of
the masses shaped by the media and schools. We saw this with Obama.
The reason why so many whites voted for Obama is because they’ve been
softened up to accept a black socialist after many yrs of liberal
Jewish media control. Of course, Jews did eventually get a land of
their own, but it was too small, too hazardous, and too distant from
the West where the Jews gained most of their freedom, power, and
wealth. So, Israel is more a symbolic prize for most Jews than their
real homeland. It is a trophy nation.)


The fact that Jewish religion stressed the need for Jewish separation
from and contempt for goyim made Jewish deviousness all the more
nasty. Most people who owned their own national real estate(homeland)
understood full well the difference between ‘our interest’ and ‘their
interest’. Everyone who owns a home has his own home-centered
interest. But, someone who must live in the homes of other people must
act as though his interest is that of the owner of the home. Because
Jews didn’t have a home(country)of their own, they had to live as
servants or guests in someone else’s home. No people could be happy
as permanent guests or servants, but Jews were especially unhappy
because their Holy Book said they are the chosen people, the favorite
of God. So, even as Jews served the goy masters and pretended to be
like happy ‘house niggers’, they concealed a poisonous wounded pride.
Also, as Jews were very smart, the Jewish servants grew richer than
the master of the house. In many European empires, the kings and
noblemen had to borrow money from the Jews to wage wars, build
monuments, throw parties, and etc. Also, the Jewish Holy Book said
there is only one God, and all the lands of the world belongs to Him.
So, even if Jews were nomads, going from one place to another and
living as a minority among the goy majority, Jews thought the world
(and its goyim) existed for the sake of the Jews(because all the world
was the House of God, and Jews were the Chosen of God. So, Jews
thought they had a divine right to economically and culturally take
over other nations. Not all Jews understood the nature of their own
psyche and how it operated, but this accounts for the Jewish
insatiability when it comes to power, wealth, and control.)

The Bible says Jews shall wander the world and grow fabulously rich
from doing business with the goyim. In other words, the Bible tells
the Jews to see goyim as the cows see grass. Grass exist for cows to
wander about and eat. Goyim exist so that Jews may wander around and
grow rich off them.


Kevin MacDonald believes that we too need a culture of critique to be
used against Jewish power or the Jewish COC, but I would go further.
We need a COC on our own culture and values as well. Again, COC isn’t
necessarily subversive. Trying to understand reality more deeply or
better is not necessarily subversive though such exercise can always
shake the foundations of our beliefs and convictions. But, that is the
price we must pay for being humans with rational minds. And, it must
be said that if we don’t examine ourselves ourselves, others will and
in bad faith. Intelligent people are attracted to analysis, thought,
intellectualism, etc. They become the most important journalists,
academics, artists, etc. Because the COC has been dominated by Jews,
Jewish thought has influenced elite culture for everyone. Because so
many on the Right stuck to old time religion, received habits and
values, or generic ideas about liberty and freedom, the Right has lost
intellectual respect. Kevin MacDonald talks about how even the best
gentile students gravitated toward radical Jewish professors at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison. It was because the radical Jewish
professors were interesting and exciting EVEN IF they were wrong about
history, society, economics, and etc. They were willing to engage
with and challenge the status quo and open people’s eyes to new ways
of seeing things. If this task had been taken up by the Right, the
Left would have been less influential and dominant in the intellectual
and cultural life of this country. Critique of our values, culture,
and heritage doesn’t necessarily mean rejection, hatred, or dismissal
of what we hold dear. It means discovering its strengths and
weaknesses, its relevance and irrelevance in the changing world. It
shows us what must be changed, what must be reconsidered, what must be
maintained. It also helps us come up with better rationale for holding
onto what we believe in.
This is why the fascism is preferable than conservatism to the modern
Right. Fascism isn’t about dogmatically clinging to the past or
resisting the future or modernity. Fascism accepts the future, change,
and modernity. But, fascism, unlike radical leftism, doesn’t try to
trash or reject everything about the past, the traditional ways, or
what’s sacred to a people. Fascism went very wrong with Mussolini and
Hitler because they institutionalized it as state dogma. Instead of
cultivating a fascist COC, they demanded that everyone just blindly
follow the great leader. Communist governments did the same to the COC
of the Left. Lenin, Stalin, and Mao didn’t want independent leftist
thinkers in their domains. Under communist rule, there was only the
Culture of Command, not Culture of Critique.


As a result, the most important Right and Left thinkers arose not in
Fascist or Communist nations but in democratic capitalist nations–
because freedom to think was allowed. Though some of these thinkers
sympathized with or supported the far-right or far-left regimes, they
would not have been able to think and express themselves freely had
they been living under those regimes. Even so, the Left far outshone
the Right when it came to intellectualism and COC, especially after WW
II. To some extent, this is understandable because the Left, more
than the Right, stands for challenging and opposing the status quo.
But, it’s also because Left had more Jews, the most intelligent people
on Earth. Also, as Jews were nomadic rootless outsiders, they were
bound to see the goy world from more odd and interesting angles. Kafka
was indeed one of the greatest artist-thinkers of all time. Even as
we reject Jewish ideas, we must admire and respect their insightful,
tantalizing, and provocative dimensions(and learn from them). A
central concept of the Right, in contrast, is sacredness, and
sacredness, though fascinating and productive in a visionary way,
doesn’t promote rational thinking so crucial to the COC. Also, there
is a tendency in sacredness to turn sublime visions into rigid dogma.
This has been the danger of Judeo-Christian-Islamic order. Because of
the totalitarian nature of Judeo-Christian-Islamism–its belief in ONE
God and His PERFECTION–, it tends to mummify spirituality or visionary
power than keep it organic and fertile. It stresses the sacredness of
rigid dogma than the sacredness of spontaneous vision, imagination,
artistic creativity, and so forth. Judeo-Christian-Islamism favors an
End of History view of the world. Judaism promised the Messiah who
would fix all the problems. Christianity promises the return of Jesus
and end of history. Islam has a similar End of Days scenario. And,
communism, which developed out of the Judeo-Christian tradition also
imagines an End of History. It offers a linear view of history that
finally culminates in utopia which ends history and time itself. The
pagan view of history is more cyclical, organic, ever-growing, ever-
shifting, alive, and fertile. It is rooted in the way of nature
itself. The danger of paganism is its amoralism as nature is amoral.
But, paganism, if properly revived and utilized, can energize the life
force of a civilization that has grown decadent or rigid. If we don’t
revive healthy European paganism, other forms of paganism will rule
supreme that will destroy European soul of the West. Afro-paganism is
at odds with Euro-paganism. Euro-paganism is reverent, noble, and
deep whereas Afro-paganism tends to be wild, crazy, and destabilizing.
Actually, there is much to admire in African tribal paganism, but the
strain of Afro-paganism that is most widespread around the world is
the American ghetto variety which is utterly trashy, ugly, demented,
filthy, and obscene. African paganism at least has something to do
with the rhythm, the beauty, and wonders of nature. Afro-American
paganism is just about guns, drugs, pimps, whores, and ‘niggaz’.


A major problem of both Fascism and National Socialism was that both
were deeply influenced by a totalistic view of the world even as they
rejected Christian dogma and communism; communism, everyone should
know, was essentially a secular totalitarian ideology based on Judeo-
Christian moralism. Though Marxism was conceptualized and promoted as
a ‘science’, its sense of worldly mission was religious and zealous in
the old Christian mode of redeeming mankind through the one true faith
that would bring justice and equality to all of mankind. Even as
Fascism and National Socialism were neo-pagan and anti-communist, both
adopted certain ideas, methods, and outlooks of Judeo-Christian
spiritual totalitarianism and communist social totalitarianism. As
such, both Fascism and National Socialism did more to stifle than
stimulate creativity, renewal, and rebirth.


Another big blow to Rightist culture and intellectualism was WWII and
the defeat of Germany and Italy(and Japan). Because of the loss of
prestige upon defeat and the revelation of all their terrible crimes
(especially by Germany and Japan), nearly all of the Right(even mild
conservatives)came under suspicion and dishonor. It just wasn’t
fashionable to be on the Right in most European countries and in the
United States through much of the postwar era.
To be sure, the Right had a golden opportunity in the 1950s with the
expansion of communist infiltration in the West, but people like
McCarthy gave this noble cause a bad name through lazy demagoguery.
McCarthy and his supporters were the best gift to the communists and
Left. By overplaying their hand in an irresponsible manner, the
liberals and leftists were able to portray anti-communists as a bunch
of paranoid lunatics.
Notice that the most of the interesting thinkers and artists–even if
you disagree with them–came from the Left since WWII. The so-called
towering intellects of the Right such as William F. Buckley and
Russell Kirk are not really all that interesting in comparison. They
may have been right about history and society, but they weren’t
stimulating or truly inspirational thinkers.
Provocative stuff attracts the best and the brightest in society who
come to control the top institutions which influence how 100s of
millions think. The Right hasn’t been intellectually or culturally
interesting. There were interesting thinkers on the Right like Ernest
Junger and Carl Jung before WWII, but people like Hitler and Mussolini
had stifled them. After WWII, because Nazism and Fascism had been
associated with neo-paganism, the Right rejected paganism and clung to
old-timel Christianity. Christianity is a great religion and a crucial
component of Western moral system, but it had turned into dogma long
ago; it had become an intellectual dead end in and of itself,
especially in the modern world with so many new possibilities,
freedoms, and ideas. The Right could not be intellectually interesting
by regurgitating Christian theology over and over, especially if it
was done without the spirit or culture of critique. For there to be
fresh visions, ideas, and imagination, the Western Right must back to
pagan mode. (Joseph Campbell, the neo-fascist intellectual,
demonstrated this. Campbell respected Christianity but approached it
from the angle of critique. He analyzed and appreciated it as myth,
poetry, narrative, history, etc. Because he had an active mind, he
made Christianity live again. For him, it was something to think
about, respect, value, criticize, explore. For Campbell, Christianity
was not just a museum piece to bow down to in blind reverence and
faith.)
Paganism doesn’t have to be totalitarian. Indeed, the problem of both
Fascism and National Socialism is they violated the fundamental
principle of paganism; in true fascism, the individual and his
visionary power must be respected. Among the pagan tribes to whom
nature is sacred and mysterious, it is incumbent for every individual
to undergo his own vision quest, find his own special and sacred place
in the world-as-corner-of-the-universe. Fascism may produce great
leaders, but they must not be someone who tells the people to bury or
suppress their own individuality and blindly follow the headman. Neo-
pagan fascism must be modern and respect the freedom of the
individual. Fascism is the rational understanding and acceptance of
the sacred soul and imagination of mankind. It must be poetic and
visionary but not literal minded and superstitious. Fascism is
essentially mythic than religious. Religion literally accepts the
supernatural whereas mythic consciousness poetically reveres the
‘mystery’ and beauty of the world.


To be sure, not all people are equally capable of imagination or the
vision thing, but all people must be given the freedom to seek their
own truth and vision if they so desire and possess the will power to
do so. The horrors and extremes of Nazism would not have been
possible if every German had the right and freedom to find his own
meaning in the new German Spring. Instead, all Germans were to abandon
their own vision quest, sacrifice their individuality, and mindlessly
merge with Hitler’s totalist vision of Germany.
People think individualism and communalism are incompatible, but that
isn’t necessarily true. Though the two ideas are opposites, opposites
also attract. A community is, after all, made up of individuals, and
it is the contributions of individuals that make up a community. And,
an individual is always a part of a community, socially and
temporally. None of us created ourselves but are the products of past
generations; and through us, future generations are created. And, even
the most extreme individual cannot do everything on his own. There is
a FREE way in which each person can be both an individual and a
communal. Ultra-individualism of the Ayn Rand variety is a fantasy,
and ultra-communalism of Nazism or communism is a prison of the soul.


There’s another reason for the loss of prestige of the Right. In the
West, the Right has been synonymous with white power, white values,
white interests, white pride(namely of gentile whites). But, as the
20th century progressed, it became obvious that white gentiles were
intellectual inferiors to the Jews and physical inferiors to the
Negroes. So, the prestige went more to the Jews in the area of ideas
& culture and more to blacks in the area sports and pop music. We all
know that ideas are very important in a country like the US which is
known for its famous universities. Also, the giant US media–owned by
Jews who are also better businessmen than gentile whites–have the
awesome power to disseminate ideas and values like no other force or
people on the planet. Liberal Jews have defacto tyrannical power over
us through the media, and leftist Jews have defacto tyrannical power
over us in the universities.


Sports are very important in America. Though America is famous for its
universities and publishing, the masses tend to be non-intellectual or
even anti-intellectual. Therefore, their idea of what’s right or
wrong, what’s cool and uncool comes from TV, movies, music, and
sports. There has been an alliance of Jews and blacks in the media and
sports. The two most influential musical forces in the 20th century
have been Jewish and Negro. Many of the hit songs, Broadway musicals,
and so forth have been penned by Jews. Jews also came to own all the
music industry. Blacks paved the way for rock n roll, rock music, soul
music, and many others that whites came to admire, emulate, imitate,
or find inspiration from. Even Lynyrd Skynyrd’s Sweet Home Alabama
owes something to black beat and rhythm. (Of course, black music was
also greatly influenced by white music, something we don’t hear much
about. Anyway, before interracial sex happened on a large scale in the
US, there was interracial music, and rock is the product of black
musical father and white musical mother. And, Jazz before that. Blacks
were the ‘father’ in the Jazz equation because black Jazzmen tended to
be more forceful and led the way. In Rock, however, white artists came
to dominate and lead the way, and indeed most blacks never really
cared for mainstream rock and stuck to soul and funk... before they
eventually moved onto hip-hop and rap.)
We may be tempted to blame the Jews and blacks for some evil
conspiracy to take over the musical culture, but that won’t do. The
fact is some of these Jewish and black artists were genuine giants
and great innovators. We must not be petty or churlish; we must give
credit where it’s due.
Of course, the West has a truly profound heritage of classical music,
but even most conservatives don’t listen to that stuff. Indeed, a
leftist or a liberal is much more likely to listen to classical music,
write about it, or pursue careers in the field. For all the talk of
Western Heritage, there is woefully little appreciation or
understanding of Western culture and history on the Right. Though
liberal and leftist Jews may be committed to destroying what we call
Western Civilization, they generally know a lot more about Western
culture than we do(just like many white educated liberals know more
about blues and African history than most American blacks do). They
read more, listen to more serious/sacred music, study it more, and
appreciate it more even as they try to undermine the power/prestige of
the West. The White Left has a love/hate relation with Western
Culture. In some crazy way, they think that they are the genuine
heirs of Western culture and civilization since the West is supposed
to be all about change, progress, equality, justice, and so on. The
French Revolution was a major chapter in Western Civilization and has
been worshiped by the Left ever since. Indeed, many on the Left
believe that their current commitment to progress is a struggle to
fully implement the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity(with
all of mankind). First, it is to turn all of Europe into one
political and economic entity. Next, it is the entire world.


Anyway, sports also played a role in the loss of prestige for the
White Right. We don’t look upon athletes as mere individuals but as
our heroes, as figures representing our collective power, might,
strength, dreams, etc. This is why every nation lionizes their gold
medal winners at the Olympics. They become National Heroes. They are
seen as bringing glory not only to themselves but to the nation as a
whole. This is why Japanese were worried when bigger and fatter
Hawaiians dominated sumo in the 90s and when stronger Mongols took it
over in the 2000s. Sumo used to be a sacred National Sport, but it’s
been taken over by foreigners. Similarly, whites used to look up to
white heroes in sports. White victory in sport came to be synonymous
with white power, prestige, and pride in general. But, the white man
got beaten by the blacks in sports. At first, whites identified with
the losers like Jim Jeffries. Though whites got beaten by Jack
Johnson, whites refused to worship black power that destroyed the
white man in the ring. Whites still rooted for the fallen white
athletes. But, as time passed and as Jews came to control the media,
increasing numbers of whites began to see the white losers as a bunch
of ‘faggoty ass white boys’ and started to look upon black athletes as
the true mythic heroes of America. Europe held out with white athletes
and pride longer than we did, but with increased black immigration to
Europe, Europe also came to look up to black athletes as figures of
National Honor and Pride. So, US, Canada, France, Holland, and UK all
send black sprinters to the Olympics. The whites in those nations
delude themselves that the blacks they’re rooting for are competing
for National Honor when, in fact, it’s all about the glory of black
power. What’s next? Will Asian nations also import and send black
athletes to the Olympics for the sake of Asian National Honor. (If
some black guy won the gold medal for Japan in the 100 m race and if
Japanese acted like it meant glory for Japan, wouldn’t we laugh at the
stupid deluded Japanese? Well, how do you think United States, Canada,
and European countries look like when they send and root for black
athletes in the name of national glory? And, isn’t it odd that
though liberals and Jews generally attack nationalist sentiments, they
fan and fuel such passions as much as possible if the national honor
is borne by black victors or by someone like Obama? Isn’t it odd that
white liberals are all of sudden very patriotic ONLY BECAUSE a black
socialist globalist committed to destruction of white America is at
the helm?)


The fact is, though black athletes may win medals for America, the
real winners are blacks and the losers are whites. The Dream Team may
be seen as an American team but it’s really a Black Team that says,
‘non-blacks need not apply’. It’s come to a point where whites kids
worship and lionize blacks as the true National or Hometown Heroes.
Even conservatives are glued to sports where blacks males dominate and
white cheerleaders shake their asses for black males.
The White Right talks about black rape of white women, but the far
greater shame is the much larger number of white women who lust after
black men and have babies with them. Many white women listen to black
music because black singers/dancers seem tougher and sexier than dorky
white guys in country music or tired rock music. And, white girls
watch a lot of sports too. (It’s hilarious that so many conservative
white guys watch sports with their white girlfriends. Don’t they
realize that the only message their girlfriends are getting is, ‘why
am with a faggoty ass flabby white boy when the real men are like
those tough black guys on the court?’ Any proud white guy who watches
the NBA or NFL is an idiot. All the glory–athletic and sexual–go to
blacks, and the money of the white goyim go to the Jews who own nearly
all the franchises. These rich Jews, like Mark Cuban-owitz, gave
millions to Obama!! I say boycott the sports and all the products
advertised during the broadcast.)


It’s the Law of Nature. In nature, males fight for the right to
sexually possess the most attractive females. Despite all our
civilized pretensions, human males also compete with each other for
the right to have sex with the most attractive females. Women are
attracted to brain power/ money OR brawn power/money. Jews beat white
gentile males in brain/money power, and blacks beat white gentile
males in brawn/money power.
So, the main interracial or interracist problem is not black men
raping white women but white women jumping into the arms of black men.
White women watch Oprah and voted for Barack Obama over John McCain.
Their white traitor bitch cunts are hungry for black cocks and they
wanna give birth to little Obamas. The liberal media(especially the
Jewish feminist gang) have promoted and sanctified Obama’s mudshark of
a mother as the ideal white women.
The White Right can bitch all it wants; the fact is the liberal Jews
own the media and control how white kids think from a very young age
when most impressionable. And, it’s only natural that the smartest
amongst us would gravitate toward Jewish-dominated culture since Jews
seem to be intellectually most interesting and gravitate toward black-
dominated sports and music since human nature worships power-that-
attracts-sexual-passions(and blacks are the toughest).


The White Right must understand that the rise of Jewish-Negro power
isn’t just the product of some conspiracy but the natural result of
freedom and competition. In a free society such as the United States
where meritocracy is still the name of the game–despite affirmative
action–, the best and most talented tend to the rise to the top. It
was only natural that the smarter and more creative Jews would make
more money and snatch control of media and academia away from white
goyim who had once controlled them. And, it was only natural that the
stronger and tougher blacks would take over sports, the streets, and
popular music whose main themes are toughness, power, and sex.
Though there was a degree of artificial social manipulation–mainly by
the Jews who run the media–, the Jewish-Negro domination is, in many
respects, the natural product of individualism and freedom. In the
past, whites gentiles discriminated against Jews in universities and
against blacks in sports. That’s how white people had kept their
dominance. If blacks had been granted total equality long ago, they
would have dominated sports and become the National Icons of Top
Manhood since the 19th century right after slavery. But, white males
feared the Negroes and artificially curtailed and suppressed black
freedom and rights. Also, white gentiles in the elite institutions
favored the less intelligent white goyim to the smarter Jews well into
the 1970s. Alan Dershowitz isn’t wrong about his experience. Why was
it that less intelligent white goy graduates of law schools were able
to find better positions than Jews who graduated at the top of the
class? It was because the WASP-controlled elite law firms favored
their own kind over the smarter Jews.
This system changed that favored whites over Jews and blacks changed
for two reasons. One was lawsuits and social agitation. The other was
the natural law of competition. Those firms that recruited the smarter
Jews did better, and so other firms also had to recruit smart Jews to
compete and survive. Eventually, Jews came to dominate many firms at
the expense of the less intelligent white goyim.
Same happened in sports. Though most teams were initially reluctant to
recruit black athletes, the fact was that teams with black athletes
had a better chance of winning than those teams without blacks. So,
even teams that didn’t want to hire blacks were forced to hire blacks
to stay on par with the competition.


In due time, Jews took over many of the elite institutions because
they were the smartest. Most of the computer innovation also came
from Jews. Just about all the top internet sites were created by
Jews. This is why most of the superduper rich today are liberals; they
are Jews in high-tech, pharmaceuticals, bio-engineering, etc. Old
Industry run by white goyim are on the way out. A great many of the
super giants of new capitalism(that relies on super brain power based
on cutting edge science, math, and computer wizardry) happen to be
Jews. Of course, there are many non-Jewish geniuses and tycoons too,
but since they get their education and culture from the Jews who
control the top universities and popular culture(Hollywood, TV, books,
etc), they too become ideological clones of the Jews.
Even the internet technology which the White Right use to get their
ideas across were created by the Jews.


And, eventually, blacks took over all of pop music and sports. Even
if a sports team were allowed to discriminate against blacks today, it
would be suicidal to do so since a team without simply won’t have a
winning season. Just look at what the ‘Dream Team’ does to white
European teams.
And, as our popular music became more sexual, pornographic, and macho,
blacks were bound to take over that realm too. Women are attracted to
masculinity, and black men are simply faster, tougher, more muscular,
more commanding, and more powerful than ‘white boys’.


The White Right wonders why all of this is happening, but it’s not
hard to understand why. It’s the Law of Nature. It’s is disingenuous
for the White Right to insist on a genetic-based, biological, and
realistic analysis/understanding of human beings and then be shocked
by the fact that so many whites have become sheepish slaves of Jews
and blacks. It’s the obvius outcome of natural processes. In a free
society, the best win. Jews are best in brain power, and blacks are
best in brawn power. Blacks take white women for the same reason that
white men take Asian girls. Many Asian girls prefer the taller and
stronger white men to the dorky and geeky Asian males with nasal
voices and small penises. For the same reason, white girls prefer
black men who are more muscular and have bigger penises. This is why
there is so much porn with black males and white females. Though we
can pretend that such filth exists ONLY because Jews who control the
porn industry want it that way, that’s not the only or main reason.
After all, suppose Jews tried to peddle porn with Asian males and
black females and marketed it vigorously. Would there be much demand
for that even with extensive marketing(except as something to laugh
at)? No.
The black male/white female porn is popular–even among white males–
because there is the belief that it’s the ultimate natural-sexual
ideal/order whereby the toughest male takes the most desirable female.
And, this is why Obama is the such a popular guy among the castrated
white males and jungle-fevered white females. He is seen as the
natural/historical product of a masterful Black Man and an attractive
White Female. In the new secular Garden of Eden, the New Adam is the
Black Man and the New Eve is the White Female. Why do white liberal
men get off this? Don’t they feel humiliated? No, because they’ve
been brainwashed since childhood to worship blacks as the nobler race;
therefore, deferring to blacks comes naturally to them. Also, many
white liberals are affluent and privileged, therefore still in a
position to patronize blacks as a poor, powerless, and disenfranchised
people. Since white liberal males grew up in social setting which is
mostly white and privileged, they feel less threatened by black men
taking white girls. Indeed, they think they are being generous and
compassionate in welcoming such social development; they flatter
themselves for their ‘tolerance’, open-mindedness’, and respect for
‘diversity’ when in fact, it’s a simple case of black guys taking
their girls and leaving them to look like a bunch of faggoty ass white
boys. To be sure, some white liberal males know full well the nature
of what’s happening, but they don’t want to sound ‘racist’ since
they’ve been told that whites must be ever so sensitive. Since they
are losing their girls to blacks anyway, white liberal men wanna act
like it’s all happening because they’ve encouraged and allowed it.
It’s a less of a blow to their ego if they act like they voluntarily
gave away their girls to blacks out of generosity and progressive
sentiments. This explains why a piece of shit like Lawrence O’Donnell
had the daughter of US president make out with a black guy in The West
Wing. The faggoty ass white liberal boy O’Donnell is trying to make it
seem like the growing interracism between black males and white
females is happening thanks to the wonderful and noble blessing of
decent white liberal men. Pathetic.


The White Right must not live in denial and simply try to blame Jews
or blacks for the growing interracism. And, the White Right will not
regain its power simply by promoting meritocracy, individualism, and
anti-affirmative action. If we totally got rid of affirmative action,
the main beneficiaries in the academia will be Jews and Asians, not
whites. And, it’s the total lack of affirmative action which has made
sports and popular music to the domain of black power and pride.


Fascism is crucial because only it understands the true nature of
power, human passions, biology, history, psychology, etc. The
Christian Right is a hokey, flakey, dweeby pile of crap. Jesus was a
pacifist Jew, and the Christian message to the White Right is feel
guilt, feel sorry, turn the other cheek, pray meekly, share with the
poor around the world, let go of tribalism and racism, etc. I will
give credit to the noble and beautiful aspects of Christianity, which
is why we should not abandon or reject it totally; there are indeed
deep and profound ideas about mercy, defeat, love, forgiveness, and so
on in the Christian religion. But, Christianity must not be the
central tenet of the White Right.


The other big force in the White Right has been libertarianism, but as
a core philosophy and policy, it is useless to the White Right
because it atomizes us. We cannot win or regain our power by dreaming
of ‘smaller government’ and everyone ‘minding his own business’.
Whenever there’s a political vacuum, someone or some force will fill
it. A nation like ours has no choice but to have a big government
(just like it has no choice but to have a big military), and it’s
better that we accept the importance of political power in this
country and try to take over government ourselves and EXPAND IT FOR
OUR BENEFIT. Also, the idea of everyone leaving others alone is a
fantasy. If someone is trying to get in your way; the best way to fend
off such people is to preemptively get in their way. Put them on
defense instead of waiting for them to put you on defense. Leave-me-
alone-ism always puts one in a defensive position. It’s better to go
into activist mode and force the other side into a defensive position.
Launch a 1000 lawsuits on a daily basis. Bleed them dry. We need
something like the ACLU, indeed many like it. Sue everything we hate
on sight whether the lawsuit is merited or not. Drive them batty like
they drive us batty. And, we need to find countless ways to attract
attention and bully those who govern institutions. We need a thousand
Acorns of the White Right to harass the Left and Liberal order
endlessly. And, call for boycotts on everything black, Jewish, or
leftist.


Look back at the 20th century, and it’s rather pitiful that the even
the best COC against the Left came from the Left. Is the Right so
pitifully lacking in wit, brilliance, insight, and analysis? Who
wrote the most famous and effective critique of communism? A
Rightist? No, a leftist socialist named Eric Blair, aka George
Orwell. The most famous anti-communist Frenchman was the liberal
Raymond Aron. The best books detailing the horrors and crimes of
communism in both Europe and America came from the Left.
The problem on the Right is the lack of curiosity and empathy for
other cultures. It is because leftists tend to be more curious and
concerned with the world and all of humanity that some of them had the
courage and integrity to research and write about the evils of
communism. Even as the Right opposed communism, it has done so in a
shrill, dogmatic, and repetitive manner. It took the liberal and
leftist journalists and historians to actually do the heavy lifting,
the extensive research, and much else to dig up the dirt about the
evils of communism. The Right was content to just attack communism
from afar.


And, though liberals and leftists actually cared about the victims of
communism, the Right was ONLY concerned about using the issue of
communism for their own narrow interests. I’m all for racial and
national self-interest and survival, but we cannot be truly human or
civilized unless we are curious about the whole world, other cultures,
other ideas, and other peoples. Even if we can’t save the world, we
need to know more about the world and learn from it. From such comes
greater knowledge. And, having greater knowledge wins the respect of
the best and the brightest of our society. The smartest people in our
society–even those from conservative families–are naturally attracted
to liberal and leftist professors because the Left seems to be more
interested and engaged with the world, with finding the truth.



Of course, things have changed in recent times. Political Correctness
has totally corrupted much of the Left. Dogma reigns supreme in many
academic departments, and the national media have become a propaganda
arm for the megalomaniac political pimp Barack Obama. If ever there’s
been a golden opportunity for the Right to regain prestige for its
brand of Culture of Critique, it is now. But, much of this has been
squandered by a Right that still embraces silly stuff like Intelligent
Design, Creationism, Ban on Stem Cell Research, Pro-Life mantra(who
cares about abortion if most babies aborted are children of liberals
and blacks?), celebrity worship(Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, etc), or
idiot Libertarianism, especially of Ayn Rand variety. Ultra-
individualism is all fine for the rare people with supreme intellect,
talent, or creativity. For most of us, individualism is best in
moderate doses. Most of us are followers and users of pre-established
ideas/systems, not Zarathustra-like prophets who’ve discovered fire to
light the world anew.


We need fascism. And, there’s something to be learned from Asians,
though we must be careful not to ape them. Asians are not
particularly good looking, strong, intelligent, nor creative. Any
black guy or an average white guy can beat up an Asian guy. Asians
tend to be studious but their IQ is on par with whites and lower than
that of Jews; they are not a genius race. As a further disadvantage,
Asians tend to be sheepish or slavish; as such, their societies are
not very innovative. There is much competitiveness in Asian society,
but it’s about getting ahead in a pre-arranged game, not a contest to
come up with new grand ideas. Maverick innovators are less common in
the East than in the West
Even among the most successful Easterners, conformism is a big element
in how they operate.


Nevertheless, Asian unity, power, pride, and progress are undeniable.
It is proof that a people don’t have to the most beautiful, most
noble, most intelligent, most powerful physically, or the most
creative in order to rise in the world and gain great wealth and
power. A people need to stick together, watch out for another, have a
strong sense of racial and cultural identity and pride. Asians have
that. It’s not Asian individualism in brain power or brawn that has
led to the rise of Asia. On an individual basis, a black guy can
destroy an Asian guy or a even a whole bunch of Asian guys. On an
individual basis, a Jewish guy can run circles around an Asian guy.
But, why do Asians have much power in the world? They stick together
and watch out for one another. There is a strong sense of group
unity. That is what’s lacking among whites. On an individual basis,
whites may be the most attractive, which is why Jewish men and black
men lust after white girls, and why many non-white women around the
world seek to be inseminated with expensive sperm of Nordic men. So,
whites are popular and desired in that sense.


But, it is this precisely this desirability that may lead to the
demise of the white race. Black men want to have more semi-black
babies with white women. Blacks prefer other blacks with white
features. And, though black men may be uglier than white men, women
have this natural attraction to power, ugly or pretty. So, many white
women prefer to go with ugly strong black men than with pretty weaker
white men.


And, white people are targeted by Jews because Jews have long been
jealous of white beauty. Ugly Jewish hags would love to see white
beauty defiled by total miscegenation. Ugly Jewish girls have often
felt insulted by the prettier blonde shikses. That’s essentially been
the real psychological underpinning of radical feminism cooked up by
mostly ugly Jewesses. Though feminism is ostensibly about the
liberation of all women, its main impact has been the destruction of
the sacred unity between white males and white females. It fills ugly
Jewish women with glee to see blonde women go with black men to give
birth to mongrels. Since the Jews cannot possess beauty themselves,
they want to defile the beauty of those who have it.


Liberal Jews will claim that what I say is a sick, pornographic
fantasy, but just look at the culture as promoted by Jews–Howard
Stern, interracism in porn, rap music, black athletes and their
fashions and styles, feminist dogma, Woody Allen, TV sitcoms, Sarah
Silverman, Sandra Bernhardt, etc. What can be more demented, ugly,
and pornographic than this? Jews try to undermine our power and our
culture with such filth, and then accuse us of seeing the world
through some kind of pornographic fantasy! We are not fantasizing
because it’s all so obvious for people to see if they have the honesty
to see. But, many of us don’t have the honesty because we’ve been
brainwashed since childhood to think that Jews are all noble, saintly,
and good NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO. So, even if a Jew spat on your
mother’s face and molested your daughter, you’d have to say he’s the
nicest person in the world; if you thought otherwise and accused the
Jew of filthy behavior, then YOU who would be accused of having a
filthy mind that hallucinates sick things. A Jew is like someone who
blows a nasty fart, but if you notice and complain about the fart, YOU
are said to be foul one for ‘fantasizing’ such.


To be sure, we have to be careful. We must not go down the path that
Hitler took and come up with false racial theories or blame all Jews
or claim that we are perfect or without problems. As humans, we have
the same problems of rest of humanity. White folks committed their
share of evil and stupidity. We can be just as evil as the rest of
humanity, and other peoples are capable of doing great things. There
is nothing inherently noble about being white or nothing necessarily
awful about being non-white. Evolution created different races because
different environments required or favored different traits, and in
that sense, all of humanity has a rightful place in the world.


But, it must also be acknowledged that certain civilizations were
envisioned and created with qualities unique to a certain race. In
that sense, Western civilization wasn’t simply a random outcome but
the product of something unique to white people. Given the diversity
of European cultures, we must avoid the deterministic falsehood.
However, it is most certainly true that all races have certain
intrinsic traits which shape the development of their civilization in
a certain way. Even when white people adopt ideas from other places,
the ideas take on a uniquely white personality or characteristic. We
can certainly see this in the development of Christianity. Though
Christian values and ideas may be the same all around the world, it
drastically changes according to races/cultures. Even when blacks
adopt a white form of Christianity, it sooner or later takes on a
black style. And, even when whites adopt the black form of
Christianity or music, it takes on aspects of whiteness. White blues,
for this reason, was never the same as black blues. And notice that
Japanese rock isn’t the same as white rock. Heavy Metal, for
instance, took many ideas from blues music, but came to embody the
unique emotional and rhythmic(or lack of such)qualities of white
people.


Anyway, the White Right needs to revive the Culture of Critique which
is old as the Greeks themselves. If the left-wing and liberal Jews
employ COC to undermine and subvert our culture, we can use COC to do
the same to their agenda, power, and interests. But, more importantly,
we need to apply COC to our own culture, history, heritage,
assumptions, values, ideas, and etc. If we don’t critique–analyze,
explore, examine, contemplate, challenge, and ponder–our own
civilization, history, and culture, then OTHER people–especially the
Jews–will do it for us, and the hostile Jewish analysis or critique of
our society and civilization will become the standard image of the
West for most people. We can practice COC to save Western
Civilization and White People than to sink them–what the liberal and
left-wing Jews are trying to do. Critique is good, and we always need
more of it. It’s good for the mind to get some exercise. Also, it’s
good to study and re-think our values and civilizations from as many
angles as possible. Indeed, we should even pay attention to critiques
of our civilization from non-Westerners and non-whites–just as Latin
Americans, Asians, Africans, and Arabs have learned much about
themselves by reading and learning what the Western/white people have
written about them. We need to guard our borders and protect our
race, BUT we must not culturally or mentally shut ourselves from the
world. We must not create the Cuba or the North Korea of the Mind. The
problem of Nazism was it promoted a cultural ghetto where ONLY ‘Aryan’
stuff was appreciated. That is really stupid. We know that all races
and all cultures produced its share of geniuses in the arts, music,
literature, and etc. We need to study and appreciate them. We should
not dismiss other cultures in wholesale fashion though, of course, we
must reject the egalitarian or multi-cultural notion that ‘all
cultures are equal’.


Publications like “American Conservative” are most welcome because it
offers contrarian views from the Right. In a way, it’s a good thing
that the Right is in exile again, because only such condition can
inspire the people to come to their senses, think and re-think their
assumptions, revise their methods and tactics, and understand the true
nature of where they are in the political, social, and cultural
playing field.
We need not a staid right but an organic Right that is not afraid of
new ideas or renewed debate. I’m going to throw up if I hear the likes
of Sean Hannity yammer about, ‘gee, what would Reagan do?’ again. How
stale and lame. Consider the fact that neo-conservatism too had its
glory days and relevance because it brought new ideas into the Right.
We may now reject many neo-con ideas as not truly conservative or too
Zionist, but at a time when the Right had grown moribund
intellectually in the 60s and 70s, it was necessary that people like
neo-cons entered the picture to infuse new blood into the movement.
Anyway, the point isn’t that neo-cons are always right, or paleo-cons
are always right. The point is that we must constantly keep our minds
open, think new ideas, reconsider and revise our values and ideas,
etc. Though some of our ideas and values may indeed be eternal and
timeless, we must constantly rethink and remind ourselves as to why
they are timeless and eternal. Only the Culture of Critique can allow
that to happen because only when we keep challenging the ideas and
values we hold dear can we examine or test them time and time again
and prove their worthiness through the thread of history.