The Law of Compensation Regarding Conservatives and Zionism.

[No Bull Savage]

You cannot gain national power in this country without the approval or
consent of Jewish power. You’re best off if the Jews fully support
you. But, if the Jews don’t like you or your views, you must at least
win their consent or mild approval. And for conservatives the only way
to win this approval is by supporting Zionism 100%. Doing so the
conservative candidate will win support from conservative Jews, who
though outnumbered by liberal Jews, are very rich and influential. He
will also face less hostility from liberal Jews who, though opposed to
conservative values and policies, are pro-Zionist and would know that
the conservative goy politician at least knows how to kiss Jewish
ass. Liberal Jews may be more critical of Israel than conservative
Jews are, but liberal Jews range from the likes of Alan Dershawitz, an
ardent Israel Hawk, to the Nation magazine which, despite its harsh
criticism of Israel, believes in the ‘right of Israel to exist’(which
means no ‘right of return’ for displaced Palestinians and no right for
Palestine to exist on the land which Israel now occupies).


Anyway, the point is gaining national power is impossible without
either the support or some degree of approval of the Jews. Since most
Jews(oligarches of the media and academia)are opposed to conservative
values and policies, how may conservatives reduces the hostility from
the vastly powerful Jewish community? Zionism is the only answer.
Since even liberal Jews love Zionism, conservatives can make
themselves acceptable, if not exactly appealing, to the Jewish power
brokers who pull the purse strings and run much of the academia/
media.


The Law of Compensation says THE MORE CONSERVATIVE A CANDIDATE IS ON
SOCIAL ISSUES, THE MORE ZIONIST HE MUST BE ON THE ISSUE OF ISRAEL. The
more a candidate opposes stuff like ‘gay marriage’, open door
immigration policy, affirmative discrimination, miscegenation(or
miscegenocide of the white race), gun restrictions, and
multiculturalism, the more he must embrace Israel dearly and nearly
and early and curly. That is the nature of the bargain in current
politics. If you oppose the social or political policies that Jews
favor in America, you must compensate by supporting Israel 100%, 200%,
or 300%.


Even among ‘conservative’ Jews, a good many support GOP mainly for the
reason that it happens to be more pro-Zionist than the Democratic
Party. If Zionism were to go away as an issue, I suspect half the
Jewish Republicans would join the Democratic Party. So, even though
18% of Jews voted for McCain in 2008, if the issue of Zionism were
taken off the table, it probably would have been 90%. Jews are 2-3% of
the US population, but 60% of donations to the Democratic Party come
from Jews, and 35% of donations to the Republican Party comes from
Jews. Even though Republicans receive less from Jews than do
Democrats, Jews are still the biggest donor group for the GOP. If Jews
are 2% of the US population, then conservative Jews are .4% of the US
population. Yet, 35% of the donation to McCain’s campaign came from
Jews. So, both parties are beholden to Jewish money and power. People
think Mitt Romney is a rich guy, but he only made $250 million, which
is laughable chump change to Jews who make up over 48% of all the
billionaires in this country.


So, sucking up to Jews is an absolute necessity in this country.
Meritocracy is a good thing, but it doesn’t just favor the most
qualified individuals; it favors certain groups over others because
certain groups have more individuals possessed of certain talents. For
example, meritocracy in sports had led to domination by blacks. And,
meritocracy in academics and business had led to the domination of
Jews. Yes, individual blacks and Jews succeeded above the rest–and
there are plenty of blacks who failed in sports and plenty of Jews who
never grew rich. But, the fact is certain sectors do become dominated
by individuals who share a common background, common race or
ethnicity. Since people of the same ethnicity or race tend to share
similar values, assumptions, and ideas, the end result of meritocracy
is not the triumph of individualism but the triumph of certain groups
over others. Sports is about triumph of black power over non-black
power. As such, blacks are worshiped by white boys and white girls as
the alpha-male race. White men have become sheepish white boys
groveling before the big tough cool black dudes, and white girls wanna
put out to black studs and give birth to little Obamas.
Business world has seen the triumph of Jewish power. Jews get to own
and control business, come up with financial tricks, and make
billions; when the system collapses due to their financial
crookedness, they use the government to bail them out. Since media
operations require lots of talent and brain power–and lots of money–,
Jews were bound to gobble up all the media as well. Some say there’s
Fox TV and point out that Murdoch isn’t Jewish, but the cultural
department of Fox Inc. has been headed by a liberal Jew. Also, Fox has
been as corrupting as Hollywood with little in the way of conservative
values. Also, Sean Hannity and those Talk Show conservatives are a
bunch of blowhard idiots who suck up to Israel night and day. They are
all a bunch of slaves to Jewish power just the same.


This is why Ayn Rand-ism is worthless to the white gentile race. It
doesn’t help us. In sports and pop culture(which has become a kind of
pornographic gladiator sports), blacks rule totally thanks to
meritocratism. In business, Jews rule. There’s nothing left in it for
us. In Ayn Rand fantasies, the great titans are usually tall,
handsome goy men, but look at our society, look at reality. The titans
of culture and business are funny looking Jews. And, though they make
their fortunes through the cutthroat Ayn Rand way, they hold and push
leftist or liberal views that empower them even further.


Their leftism is opportunistic, tribal, and idealistic. It’s
opportunistic because bigger government is simply another means for
rich folks and their kids to rule society politically as well as
economically. It’s tribal because it’s in the Jewish interest to make
US more diverse so that Jews can play different groups against one
another like Jerry Springer plays white and black trash guests on his
show. (This is why Mel Gibson said, “Jews start all wars”). . Also,
it’s in the Jewish interest to castrate white men into white boys and
to divide white women and white men. Destroy the cultural, sexual,
and historical unity of white men and white women, and the white race
is finished. This is the REAL aim of feminism. It’s not about women
power. It’s about brainwashing white women to side with Jews, blacks,
Hispanics, Asians, gays, and other ‘victim’ groups against the Evil
White Male. Notice that feminists go easy on instances of non-white
male oppression of women. Indeed, feminists get more worked up about
white conservative males who believe in full freedom for women than
against Muslim males who treat their women like property or against
black males who treat their women like whores.


Anyway, the Law of Compensation is something we must be aware of
because it has poisoned the well of conservative politics. And, no
one was a bigger poster boy of the danger of this rule than George W.
Bush. We know that Bush’s social policies were detested by the
Jewish community. I didn’t like some of them myself as the Christian
Right is pretty stupid. Anyway, the fact is Bush’s social policies
were very conservative in certain areas. Jews in this country are
mainly interested in social and domestic issues, even more so than in
Israel. Jews want us to accept ‘gay marriage’, open borders(and
illegal ‘immigration’), multiculturalism which blames white people for
all the problem of the world(Jews excepted of course), radical feminism
(which divides white man and white woman), gun restrictions, and
interracism(whereby white women are goaded and encouraged to give
birth to black babies). Many white conservatives are opposed to these
Jewish policies. As such, the Jews denounce white conservatives as
‘racists’, ‘xenophobes’, ‘homophobes’, ‘sexists’, and other stupid
slurs they pulled out of their hairy arses. Since Jews are so
powerful, how can conservatives hope to succeed on the national
political stage against the might of the Jewish controlled liberal
media? The only way is to woo the Jew is by being even more Zionist
than the Jews themselves. And that was the essence of Bush’s foreign
policy.


Jews hated Bush, but they tolerated him because he was a foreign
policy puppet of Neocon Zionists. Though neocons and liberal Jews
don’t see eye to eye on many issues, there is a Jewish camaraderie
between the two groups. And, both sides agree mostly if not 100% on
Israel. Though liberal Jews at NY Times, CNN, ABC News, New Republic,
Time, and Newsweek will insist that they were duped into supporting
the Iraq War because the Bush administration lied about intelligence
reports, they really supported Bush’s war because they thought it
would be good for Israel. Neocons and Jewish liberals came together to
support Bush’s war in the hope of re-making the Middle East so that
Israel will be safer. And if Iraq War had turned out well, liberal
Jews would not be complaining that no WMD were found. They would be
happy that the Middle East had been made safe for Israel. They would
have lauded Bush on the war. Of course, they would still hate Bush on
social issues and look for some other reason than the war to unseat
him. But, the fact is Bush won some degree of Jewish consent if not
support when his foreign policy turned out to be overwhelmingly pro-
Israel.


And, we see this over and over among nearly all national conservative
politicians. The more they espouse conservative social values and
policies, the louder they scream about how Israel is dear to us,
precious to us, close to us, and blah blah. You’d think they care
more for Israel than for the US. This is why Ron Paul never had a
chance. Whatever his faults and merits, he stood for policies at odds
with the Jewish community and had the guts to criticize Israel. He
violated the Law of Compensation. So did Pat Buchanan. If you’re gonna
go against the Jews on social policy, you MUST compensate by groveling
before the Jews on the issue of Israel. Ron Paul and Buchanan
violated the Law.


Problem with Bush is he took this too far and embarrassed the Jews. He
was such an ass-kisser of the Jews on the issue of Israel that more
and more people around the world began to think, “JEWS REALLY DO
CONTROL AMERICA.” People on both the Right and Left all over the
world saw Bush as a toady of Israel and American Jews. They saw Bush’s
strings pulled by Neocon Jews.


Jews are always hungry for more power in reality, but they want to
appear powerless in public. They want to own billions but want to act
like they just walked out of a shtetl or a Nazi death camp. But,
Bush’s slavishness to Jews on foreign policy made Jews look very
powerful. A book like “Israel Lobby” would have been dismissed at
any other time, but it received a degree of positive attention because
it became obvious who holds the REAL power and wealth in America
during the Bush era.


It must be said the ‘Israel Lobby’ is a misnomer. It should be called
the USrael lobby as there is no distinct barrier between Israel and
the US. Jews go back and forth from NY, LA, or Washington DC to
Israel. Israel is more powerful in Washington DC than all the other
countries combined. It is more powerful and influential than any of
the 50 American states. This is not because US is under Israeli
occupation but because it’s under Jewish-American occupation. Israel
is powerful in the US because Jewish Americans are powerful. If US had
no Jews, Israel would have no power over us. But, American Jews hold
the media, academia, and the purse strings.
They’ve been telling us over and over that Israel is special to us. We
didn’t decide this on our own. No, Israel’s importance to us was fed
to us by the Jewish media and academia. We’ve told that we love Israel
because Israel is a democracy like ours, Israel was founded much like
the US was, Israel has been a staunch ally during the Cold War, etc.
These are not OUR thoughts and sentiments. No, they are thoughts and
feeling dictated to us by the Jewish media. Following the logic and
reasons given by Jews as to why we love Israel, we can make a counter-
argument on the same grounds. If US was founded upon rebellion
against oppressive authority, we could just as well side with
Palestinians who could be compared to American colonialists and
minutemen. If democracy is so dear to us, we can say Palestinians are
fighting for equal rights, equal dignity, and equal claim to their
ancestral land. If the issue of Cold War allegiance is what makes
Israel dear to us, then let us remember that NO GROUP in the US did
more to spy for the USSR, aid and abet radical leftist groups, stir up
black rage and hatred against whites, supported Fidel Castro and Che
Guevara, and undermine our efforts in Vietnam than Jewish-Americans.
Jews were the biggest thorn on our side during the Cold War era. Jews
were by far the most radical, most anti-American, the most communist-
sympathizing group in America. So, the reasons that are given as to
why we love Israel are not our own reasons; they are reasons foisted
upon us by the Jewish media. If we need to understand anything, it’s
that we must stop allowing Jews to think for us. We must think on our
own according to what’s good for OUR interests. Jews in America and
Israel are not good for our interests.


Anyway, Bush went overboard with the Law of Compensation. Jews want
politicians to support Jewish interests but don’t want them to look
beholden to Jews. That would mean that Jews are indeed powerful. Bush
made Jews look all-powerful. Much of the Bush hatred around the world
had an element of distrust, resentment, and even hatred of Jewish-
American power. Many Europeans envy and hate Hollywood and American
pop culture’s control over the world. Their criticism of American
policies is often really an attack on Jewish-American power. But, as
Jews are linked to the Holocaust and due to Europe’s long history of
antisemitism, Europeans would rather not say it so openly. Europeans
did notice that Bush was 200% pro-Israel and his foreign policy seemed
guided and controlled by neocon Jews. Also, the world wondered why
liberal Jewish institutions supported the war. Why did NY Times and
New Republic give their thumbs up and fan the war fever? Why was much
of the liberal Jewish media coverage of the war so favorable(in the
early stages)? We know why. The Jews thought the war would stabilize
the Middle East and that it would be good for Israel. Jews, both
neocons and liberals, wanted to show the world how an America-guided-
by-Jewish-power could fix the world’s problems. But, the war went very
badly. The world began to say ‘we told you so’ and started to blame
America for its arrogance and hubris. This is when liberal Jews all
jumped ship and tried to put all the blame on Bush. They acted all
innocent and said they’d been duped by Bush the liar. The neocons
couldn’t jump ship so easily as they had positioned themselves within
the GOP power structure. But, even neocons who had been behind the war
found various excuses to support Obama in 2008. Yep, it’s the Jewish
way. No principles, no loyalty. Just their conniving self-interest.


Iraq War or no Iraq War(and its political fallout), the Jews would
have supported Obama anyway. Obama is their boy. He’s the child of
black male/white female sexual union. He is the template of what Jews
want to happen to all of white America. Jews want white males to be
emasculated into metrosexual quasi-homos and white females to open
throw themselves at black men. This will destroy white power forever,
and Jews will be All-Powerful forever. Jews want to control a black
guy who would morally and spiritually lord over a bunch of pussified,
sappy, dorky, and self-loathing white boys and jungle-feverish girls.
Jews also want to remake the black community. Jews want blacks as
moral allies–Jews, victims of Holocaust, linked with blacks, victims
of slavery(both victims of white racial oppression). But, too many
blacks resent Jewish success and blame Jews for a lot of black
problems. Many blacks also side with Palestinians against Israel. So,
it was in the interest of Jews to prop up a clean-cut black guy who
would challenge the crazy styles of Al Sharpton and his ilk who are
hostile to Jews. But, Jews were careful to make sure that Obama
didn’t appear totally pro-Jewish as that would make Obama seem like a
puppet of Jews. So, Obama has been allowed to associate with some
Palestinian-Americans and dilly-dally with the likes of Wright and
Nation of Islam followers. This would give cover to Obama’s dependence
on the Jews.


Obama is useful to the Jews because it gives the false impression that
US is no longer presided by a Jewish puppet–Bush. Many idiots actually
think Obama is his own man when he’s really beholden to Jews even more
than Bush ever was. Bush was beholden only to neocon Jews whereas
Obama is beholden to both neocon and liberal Jews. And, record amount
of Jewish money went to supporting Obama. And the Jew-run media gave
Obama favorable cult-like coverage like you wouldn’t believe. Now,
some people will say that many Obama supporters in the media are non-
Jews, but as Jews own all those media outlets, Jews have hired mostly
liberal pro-Jewish gentiles over the yrs. So, even gentiles in the
media were handpicked by the Jews. (And, as a disproportionate number
of “conservatives” on TV and radio are Jews, even they will never ever
criticize Jewish power. Jewish conservatives will rail against the
Left, but never against the Jewish Left–despite the fact that Jews
pretty much define and control the Left. Jewish conservatives will
specifically go after Mexican power, Chinese power, Saudi power, or
Muslim power, but they’ll never attack Jewish power–despite the fact
that Left in this country is largely Jewish, especially at the top.)


Obama is also useful to Jews because Bush’s aggressive Zionism has
failed. Bush ended up destabilizing the Middle East and only increased
the ire of many Muslims who came to see US as a totally Jew-controlled
nation. Though Bush was 200% pro-Israel, this backfired on the Jews.
It made it seem as though Bush was doing EVERYTHING for Israel. So,
the cunning Jews decided to go with Obama, supposedly a fair-minded
person because of his multi-racial and multi-religious background.
But, it is all a sham. The only thing about Obama that isn’t pro-
Jewish is his ideology of black identity. There is indeed an element
of Black Power-ism in Obama, but Obama the sly fox is as cunning as
the Jews. He knows that Jews have all the money and power in the US.
He always knew that he had to play along to Jewish interests and
power. So, Obama has suppressed his black power side of his ideology.
Other than black power ideology, Obama’s influences are all Jewish. He
came under the influence of Marxism, a Jewish theory. He went to Ivy
League schools and hung around radicals, a good many of them Jews.
And, his spiritual mentor was Saul Alinsky, another dirty left-wing
Jew. His professors were Jewish. His associates were Jewish. His big
money men have been Jewish.


But, Jews don’t want Obama to act totally beholden to the Jews. Bush
did that, and it actually made it worse for the Jews because world
came to see who has the real power in America. So, Obama is supposed
to act like he is independent, is his own man, a brilliant thinker of
staggering intellect(though Jews do all the thinking for him), and
fairminded to all peoples. And, so many people have fallen for this
crap, which goes to show how stupid the world is.
But, even foreign people who see through this charade like the fact
that Obama is president because they want US to be humiliated. The
idea of a black guy becoming president means, for many people around
the world, that the evil whites are losing grip of their country.
Whites are now ruled by a black man who belongs to the race that had
once served as slaves in America; whites have now become the spiritual
and moral slaves of blacks(and financial and political slaves of
Jews).


Another reason why Obama doesn’t have to be slavish to Jewish interests
(at least publicly) is that he supports the social policies that Jews
want. Deep down inside, Obama is for ‘gay marriage’, open borders for
illegal invasion, taking guns away from whites, multiculturalism which
blames whites for all the problems in the world, global welfare,
radical feminism which divides and weakens the white race(as only
white males are routinely attacked by feminism while non-white men
still qualify as ‘victims’ under the ‘people of color’ banner).
Since Obama is for all the social policies that Jews want to push on
us, the Law of Compensation doesn’t apply to him. The Law only
applies to conservatives because they must make up for angering Jews
on social issues. Again, the only way conservatives can make up for
pissing off the Jews on issues like ‘gay marriage’ is by supporting
Zionism 100%. Bush took this to the logical limit, and Jews got
burned because it made Jews look too powerful(which they really are).
These are things we must understand if we are to confront Jewish power
and see it for what it.