Time to lay GOP to rest.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

The Iron Boot

unread,
Jan 22, 2009, 6:45:13 PM1/22/09
to The Fascist Road to Democracy. Society of Neo-Fascism.




http://buchanan.org/blog/2009/01/pjb-is-gop-still-a-national-party/comment-page-1/#comment-15085

GOP served its useful purpose. Now, it's time for it to go. When a
horse's leg is broken, you put it out of its misery. You don't let it
slowly die in pain. It's truer with an elephant. An injured elephant
is useless. It must go. It's time to put a bullet through its head.
Not out of hate, but out of love.

The GOP can survive only one way, but it will no longer be the GOP as
we've known it. For the GOP to be 'inclusive', it has to pander to
blacks and other minorities. It has to be pro-affirmative
discrimination. To win over the expanding yuppie and affluent suburban
vote, GOP has to become socially liberal, i. e. pro-Gayass Marriage.
To win over Hispanics, the Party must purge itself of the anti-Illegal
crowd. It's just the fact of culture and demographics.

Black numbers are rising not only due to higher birthrates but
increased immigration from Africa and the Carribbean. Mexicans and
other Central Americans are flooding into the US in great numbers for
jobs(and for reconquista and welfare fiesta). Economically, the most
powerful people are the yuppie folks; to be sure, the economic
interests of yuppies don't jibe with demands of blacks and illegal
Americans, but as Jesus said, 'man doesn't live by bread alone'.
Conditioned to worship Martin Luther Bling since babyhood and
indoctrinated at radical fancy universities, the affluent class of
Americans have become socially very very liberal. Indeed, black
Democrats are socially more likely to agree with us than rich white
Democrats. If not for non-whites, gayass marriage would have passed in
California.

The affluent white class wasn't always like this, but the left won the
culture war. The Right lost because too many conservatives were gun-
hugging, bible-thumping dimwits afraid of intellectualism and
creativity. So, arts and ideas became the domain of liberals and
leftists. And, though people like Buchanan went into journalism, most
conservatives did not. The media also became the domain of the left
and liberals. How do we remember history? Though books and lectures,
but who dominates those areas? Liberals and leftists. We can complain
about liberals and leftists controlling academia, media, and Hollywood
all we want. The fact is libs and leftists took the time and effort to
succeed in those areas. Most conservatives just went after money,
guns, or church attendance. Money is power, to be sure, but money must
buy talent, and the fact is most creative and intellectual talent have
been liberal or leftist. So, if a conservative tried to set up a
rightwing Hollywood, he would be in deep doodoo because most cons have
no artistic talent; even he would have to hire liberal talent in order
to succeed. Most conservative universities are second-rate; they don't
attract the best minds nor produce new ideas that attract the best
minds. So, even or especially the affluent who got fancy education in
best colleges turned more and more left.

So, GOP is really in deep doodoo mode. Demographically, it's losing
out to blacks and Hispanics. It won't be long before blacks outnumber
whites in Red States too. As for SW states, they are already pretty
much more Mexican(and other Central American) than white. GOP looked
to Asians with hope, and indeed, the majority of Asians in key states
like California voted Republican in the 80s. Many were new immigrants
who were fed up with crime. They were into family values and work
ethic. They were anti-communist. But, things have changed. As many of
them have succeeded, their kids went to fancy schools where they
sucked up knowledge from radical Jewish professors. Asians are
essentially sheepish; they just go along with the leader, and so
Asians sucked up to leftist whites and Jews. Also, more and more
Chinese arrived from the Mainland. Though capitalist in practice, many
revere Mao Zedong, the mass-murdering commie Archie Bunker of China.
As many of these Chinese want more of their kind to come, they are
gonna favor Democrats who are more lenient on immigration.

Some say the GOP should be more inclusive, but the fact is it is and
has been. Buchanan is right that the GOP has been mostly a white
party, but not because it barred non-whites. It's because non-white
groups have demanded something other than equality and fairness;
they've demanded special recognition, special status, special
privileges, special favors, special rights, etc. Democrats didn't
attract non-whites with appeals of equality but with appeals of more-
equal-than-equal. So, blacks got affirmative hiring, Hispanics got
affirmative immigration(Asians too), and gays are on the verge of
getting assfirmative marriage. With the GOP having taken away the
thunder of color-blindness from Democrats with the rise of Nixon and
triumph of Reagan, the liberal-leftist-Democratic card became
'multiculturalism'. Fight for equal rights having been won, the Left
began to agitate for equal outcomes, special favors, etc. This was
pretty lowdown, cheap, and sordid. It was a dirty way of buying votes,
a form of political bribery. In the old days of white ethnic
domination, it was called 'machine politics'. But, being ever so
creative and intellectual-ish, liberals came up with a grand oral/
cultural/political/social theory around it. As a result, many well-
educated white folks came to see 'multiculturalism' as something
wonderful, progressive, brilliant, and noble when in fact it was just
a slimey way for liberals and Democrats to gain power by stoking and
bribing various tribalisms.

In the old days of 'machine politics', everyone knew what it was all
about. It was about the Irish, Italians, Jews, Greeks, Blacks, etc
saying 'hey, gimme mine'. Democrats and liberals accepted and
exploited this reality for what it was, but no one pretended it was
some higher moral calling or intellectually conceived system. But,
multiculturalism attained that kind of aura as 'the smartest' people
in the media and academia seemed to promote it. So, Dems not only
gained in tribal politics but won over the affluent smart set who
should have known better.
How does the GOP compete with this? It can't if it wants to remain the
GOP. We can go the Democratic route, but we'll just be another
Democratic Party. We'll be gayass elephants, like the ones in
Fantasia.

So, it's time to honor and lay the GOP down to rest. So, does that
mean it's all over? No, the fun's just begun. I say we all become
Democrats and subvert the party from within. It's like this. When
commies tried to take over the free world with arms, the free world
stood up. But, when the commies subverted us from within, they
eventually took over. So, we have the Barack dungheap Obamarx as
president. The commies could never ever have done this with arms. They
did it by acting like ordinary Americans. By acting mainstream.
Eventually, they took over the mainstream institutions. We've become
their slaves.

We can still be conservative, rightist, or whatever-ist as Democrats.
"Democrat" doesn't mean anything. There have been liberal Republicans
and conservative Democrats. If we all join the Democratic Party, we
can join forces with conservative and moderate Democrats against the
liberal and leftist Democrats. Suppose in 2008, we'd all been
Democrats. Obama would not have won. We would not have gotten Fred
Thompson or Ron Paul, but we would still have gotten Hillary over
Obama--a white person over black person. Suppose all the conservative
Democratic votes--ours--joined with all the Hillary supporting
moderate Democrat votes. Barack dungheap Obama would not be president
right now. I hate Hillary but better her than Obama, the scummiest and
sleaziest punk to ever enter the Oval Office.

Indeed, look what happened with Joe Lieberman thanks to Republicans
joining togther with moderate Democrats. Lieberman had lost the
primary to some superliberal jerk, but he won the general election
with the support of moderate Democrats and conservative Republicans.
Better a mod lib than a total lib.

Things being what they are, there is slim chance that we are gonna be
able to elect a conservative president, but we can still unite with
moderates and conservatives among the Democrats to block someone as
radical, leftist, and unwhite as Barack dungheap Obama. Something is
better than nothing; with Obama, we've ended up with NOTHING.
So, that's what we must do. Honorably lay the GOP to rest. It's served
us well, but the changing nature of this country has destroyed the
appeal of ideology of colorblind equality. Blacks and Hispanics want
affirmative hiring, and Hispanics and Asians want affirmative
immigration. The well-educated and affluent white middle and upper-
classes, though they lived in mostly segregated/gated communities,
wanna put on airs that they are sooo progressive and sophisticated
with their 'tolerance' and 'inclusiveness'. Jews are especially
masters at this game. Though at the very top and having more power and
influence than we can imagine--and living in the whitest of the white
neighborhoods--, they want people to look upon Jews as 'the noble
saints of history siding with poor people-of-color against those evil
WASPS'. Of course, if you're a Palestinian in Gaza, you're worse than
an ape and lower than a cockroach.

Jews sure are superpowerful. Indeed, read Buchanans' article, and he
barely mentions the role of Jewish power in the rise of Democrats and
election of Barack dungheap Obama. Buchanan instead reminds us that
Asians voted 60 to 40 for Obama. But, there is no mention of the fact
that Jews voted for Obama 8 to 2. Also, which group pumped most money
into Obama's campaign? Jews. Who operated the Obama machine? The Jews.
Who owns and runs the media that gave Obama a pass at every turn?
Jews. Jews are so powerful that even pitbull Buchanan turns
chihuahua.

In a big way, even our immigration problem is essentially a Jewish
problem. Liberal Jews pushed for loose immigration policy more than
any other group. Liberal Jews have also used schools and media to fool
us that anyone who opposes tidal wave immigration, both legal and
illegal, are bigots. Jewish control of laws and courts have made it
impossible to enforce immigration policies. Liberal Jewish media also
block out much of the news about what's happening to decent Americans
as a result of illegal immigration. We've seen very little of what has
happened to Palestinians in the Gaza Massacre or the Rape of Gaza, but
the same is true of what's been happening as a result of illegal
immigration. We see or hear almost nothing of American victims of this
massive problem. It's all blocked out. Instead, we get news stories
about how minutemen patrolling the border are subhuman apes or
cretins. When water leaks into your house, don't blame the water.
Water naturally will flow to open spaces. The question is who's
designed the pipe, who built the wall? And why won't anyone fix the
problem? The problem is the liberal Jewish control of our eyes, ears,
and minds.

Anyway, we should look forward to becoming Democrats. Also, let us
remember the words of the Founding Fathers who were deeply worried
about Party politics. If we all become Democrats, we can focus on the
worth of indivdual politicians than just go with party labels. With
our two party system, we are kneejerkedly likely to vote for a
Republican while liberals and negroes are likely to kneejerkedly vote
a Democrat. If we are ALL Democrats, we'll have to judge each person
according to his own merits, his stances on issues. There will be less
blind-folded touch-feel politics.

And, consider the fact that even blue states are not all that liberal
if you look closely. White Democrats and black Democrats are really
two different animals. They fight for the same pie in NY, Chicago,
Philadelphia, etc. There is very little trust. And, there is very
little trust between negroes and Hispanics. If anything, the reason
why white liberals and minorities have stuck so closely together is to
stand against us--the enemy of your enemy is your friend. But, if we
are their 'friends' too, there will be far more confusion and division
within the liberal ranks. The Cold War united neocons and paleocons.
In the 80s, Pat Buchanan and Ben Wattenberg could put aside their
differences to fight the Russkies. But, Cold War ended, and Paleos and
Neos have been acting like Keith 'the dean of mean' Jardine vs. Chuck
Liddell. George W. Bush was the GREAT uniter among the Democrats. But,
if we all join up with the Dems, many moderate and conservative-
leaning Dems might think, 'hey, I have more in common with
conservative Dems--that be us--than with them crazy negroes and
illegal hispanics.'

It is time to be devious, it is time to be creative, it is time to
have some fun. We can sit by the slowly dying elephant and weep all we
want--to the delight of the Jewish jerks in New Republic who are
gloating and every right to gloat. Or, we can be like a man of the
West who knows when his horse is done for. He would shoot the horse.
It's time we shot the elephant.
Then...let us learn from the leftwing Jews. Let us be devious and
subversive. Let us join the Democrats. All of us. Let's mess them up
from the inside. When Rush Limbaugh called on Operation Choas, I
thought it was lowdown and dirty--and it was, in a way. But, it's the
only option left if we're gonna fight for our interests. ALL OF US
have to pull an operation chaos within the Democratic Party. We must
favor conservative Democrats whenever possible but in places where
cons have no chance, we can still unite with moderates to favor a
moderate liberal over a hard liberal. Something is better than
nothing.

I've said we're all Palestinians now because we're all under Jewish
occupied territory. But, we must all fight like Jews--that is to be
devious and subversive. Indeed, this is where Palestinians have failed
most. If Palestinians had played it like Jews, they would be winning.
Suppose Palestinians had acted like they're all for peace and
coexistence in the 80s instead of starting intifada. There would have
been no wall between Israel and West Bank. There would have been no
checkpoints. West Bankers would today be entering and leaving Israel
with ease. With their fast expanding population, Palestinians would
eventually take over Israel. But, Palestinians got hotheaded and
decided to fight headon. This united the much divided Likud and Labor
in Israel to crush the Palestinians.

So, though we are like Palestinians, we must all fight like the Jews.
Be devious. Act like, 'oh yeah, we're defeated. Libs are the boss.
We're all gonna join the Democratic Party'. And, then mess it up from
within like a mofo.
Some may ask... but what if this leads to the collapse of the
Republic? All the better, for we can build a new republic in a great
revolution. Are you men or are you wimps? We must be for the American
civilization, not for the American party system, American government,
American democracy. I'd rather live in an America that is a mostly
white socialist dictatorship than in an America that is democratic and
capitalist but looks like South Africa or Brazil.

GOP should mean nothing to us. It was just a vehicle, a useful
vehicle. A hardy and tough vehicle as long as it lasted. But, no car
lasts forever. Just because we get a new car doesn't mean our life is
over. We must be attached to the nation, not to a party. Blacks had
once been deeply attached to the GOP but they switched overnight to
Dems. Southern Whites had long been Democrats but most of them became
Republicans. So much for party politics. They can take my party but
they cannot take my nation. To save the nation, we must lay the GOP to
rest and subvert the Dems from within. Use the bullet on the elephant
and the virus on the donkey.

As for libertarianism, it's time to toss that funny joke away.
Liberals and leftists love nothing more than when whites--especially
white males--adopt libertarianism. Why? Because libertarianism
atomizes, separates, and isolates us. Instead of fighting for
something solid, substantial, and real like racial unity, territory,
political power, etc, we all end up chasing some abstract notion of
'liberty'. Liberty is meaningless outside community, freedom is
meaningless outside a polity. I'm all for freedom and liberty, but
such can only meaningfully operate within a community; the real
question is what kind of racial, national, cultural community do we
want? Is 'my freedom to smoke pot, own kiddie porn, and gamble my
money away' the greatest political principle in the world?
Libertarians, like anarchists, will never ever ever come to power or
ever exert any kind of significant political pressure. Individualism
is fine, but absent community it is meaningless and lonely. Just watch
"Into The Wild" if you don't believe me. John Wayne didn't just fight
for freedom; he fought for freedom as a white man in a white country.
Today, blacks are for black power, Hispanics are for Hispanic power,
Asians are for Asian power, and you know Jews are for Jewish power
(despite their devious bogus universalist charade). It's time to be
for white power. It's not a supremacist idea but a survivalist idea.
White power must come BEFORE individual liberty. It's not either/or
where we must have one and not the other. We can have both by
acknowledging that white freedom can only exist along with white
power. For there to be white power, there must be white unity, white
identity, white sense of brotherhood and sisterhood and motherhood and
fatherhood. Cokie Roberts wrote a book called "We are our mother's
daughters", but let's not forget we are our daughter's mothers too.

I know why some white boys are libertarian. They are trying to have it
three ways. What with 'conservatism' sounding old-fashioned, fogey,
and stuffy, they want a sexy and youthful label. Also, the emphasis on
individuality shields libertarian white males from accusations of
bigotry; a libertarian can always say, "I'm for equal freedom and
liberty for all regardless of skin color or sex.". BUT, white
libertarians know that white folks have more and tend to be more
successful than blacks or browns, so libertarianism, in effect, does
favor whites over non-whites. Yes, very clever of you libertarian
knuckleheads. Like NO ONE can see through this bogusness.
The fact, however, is that Jews are even smarter and more successful
than gentile whites. Jews gain more power and money in a freewheeling
capitalist system, and they get to do whatever they want with their
influence. This power cannot be challenged capitalistically because
Jews whup our asses in moneymaking. The only way to combat Jewish
power is by white socialism or national socialism. This is what the
Irish did to gain power in Boston and Chicago. WASPs had the wealth,
so the drunken dimwit Irish used their great numbers to take over city
hall, fire department, the police, and etc. I'm all for capitalism
when it serves white power. I'm all for socialism when it serves white
power. Hitler was a lowlife murderous scumbag who ruined Europe BUT
the economic side of National Socialism was genius. It was both pro-
capitalism and pro-socialism as long as both could serve German
interests.

In a way, the book "Liberal Fascism" by Jonah Goldberg was briliant.
Overstated and childish in many ways, true. But, it's also true that
liberals have adopted national socialism to serve their own interests.
Liberals gained tremendous economic power; so they've put Obama in
office so they can expand their govenrment power as well.
Transnational capitalism makes them rich, big government socialism
makes them powerful. Well, how stupid for conservatives to only call
for lower taxes, less government, blah blah blah, as though the GOP is
still the party of the rich when the superrich are mostly liberal now.
I mean how retarded can we be? We are occupied like the Palestinians.
We must be devious like the Jews. We must work hard through
capitalism. But, we must also use the drunken Irish machine politics
socialism to gain power for our interests. Anything and everything.
The Third Way Our Way.

When I say we should look to government, I don't mean we should be for
massive Big Government. Instead, we should try to go into government.
As many conservatives are intellectually second-rate(including yours
truly), they can do well in government. It takes special Jewishy
brilliance to win big in business. It takes special black braun to win
big in sports. But, ANYONE with diligence and work ethic can do well
in government. There are many lazy and wasteful people in government,
mostly liberal. Why? Because we've avoided and ignored government as
career. This is too bad. If we went into government, we would (1) gain
more power (2) blow the whistle on corruption as we'll be on the spot
to witness the workings of the system (3) work hard to make sure
government runs fairly and cleanly. For centuries, generations of
Europeans joined the Jesuit brotherhood or such to serve God and
community. Most of these people joined for a higher cause, not just
for three square meals a day. Many generations of Americans have
served in the miltary, a form of government, to defend their nation.
Why can't conservatives see government the same way? Government can be
the problem--bloated, wasteful, lazy, corrupt. But, it can also be the
solution if run right and operated efficiently. It takes no special
brilliance to work in government. You just have to be hard working,
dedicted, and decent--just like in the miltary. If there were many
cons in the bureaucracy, we could run it better. We could root our
corruption. We could blow the whistle. If some welfare cheat demanded
more benefits, we would go the extra step and see if she's lying or
not instead of just pushing paperwork and giving her more benefits.
Working in government can be like serving in the military or in the
fire department. Firemen fight fires. Soldiers fight foreign enemies.
Government workers can fight corruption from within. They can also
serve good people and fight bad people. If cons were all over
government, we'd be blowing whistles constantly on how much of
taxpayer dollars are being wasted.

Conservatives should also look to education. Education is a war
against ignorance. The problem is most liberal teachers are not
promoting education but indoctrination, a form of higher ignorance,
and political correctness, a form of higher bigotry.
Cons always idolize the businessman but most cons don't have the
brains to make it big. Sure, anyone can run a small shop and do okay,
but if you really wanna succeed like an Ayn Rand hero, you gotta be
supersmart in pharameuticals, hightech, computers, finance, etc, and
it's the liberal Jews and other such who are raking in the billions.
We should look to government because anyone can serve well. Your lack
of brilliance can be made up with your dedication and seriousness.

Anyway, who has a highpowered rifle, and who wants to put the bullet
in the GOP? I think that honor should go to Pat Buchanan. And, we'll
consider the Reagan Library as the elephant's graveyard since he was
the last hurrah of the party.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages