Philosemitism Is More Dangerous than Antisemitism... At Least in Today’s World.

[No Bull Savage]

If antisemitism is a unified theory(of science, religion, history,
etc) that views Jews and/or Jewish culture as essentially sinister,
philosemitism argues the very opposite. Philosemitism is a grand
theory that says Jews are the fountain of much if not all that are
wise and noble. It says Jews are inherently good, or at least better
than other people. It believes that Jews are essentially harmless or
beneficial to mankind. Even when Jews gain great power, wealth, and
influence(and even when they commit acts of evil), we are to convince
ourselves we need not worry about since JEWS, a naturally noble and
wonderful people, have the power, wealth, and influence. Since Jews
are great, it would be wrong to question their power as it would be
wrong for Christians or Muslims to question God.


Now, some Jews will argue that philosemitism or Judeification–
deification of the Jew–is also a form of antisemitism. Since it
idealizes and ennobles the Jew toa ludicrous degree, philosemitism may
judge Jews according to a higher moral criteria. We are seeing some of
this in the international criticism of Israel. How often do we hear
critics say, “since Jews experienced the Holocaust and were ennobled
by the suffering, Jews ought not treat Palestinians the way Nazis
treated the Jews.” Jews often complain that the world judges Israel
differently than other countries with far worse human rights record.
After all, where is the UN condemnation of what China has been doing
to Tibet? What has the world done about the horrors happening now in
the Congo?
The animosity toward Israel has elements of both antisemitism and
philosemitism. Antisemites exploit the Israel-Palestinian conflict to
point out that Jews are ‘just like the Nazis’. But, philosemites are
also anti-Zionist because of their ‘spiritual’ view of the Jew as the
Eternal Victim, Eternal Martyr, Eternal Saint. The philosemite is
filled with guilt about what happened in the Holocaust; he is filled
with great sympathy and admiration for the Jew. But, this love
requires the Jew to be holy schmoly. When they witness tough militant
Jews beating up on weak and poor Palestinians, their philosemitic
world view is threatened.


But, Jews are not being entirely sincere because they are the main
proponents of philosemitism or Judeification. The media–Hollywood,
publishing, TV, news, etc–are largely controlled by Jews, their
brainwashed puppets, and their sympathetic allies. So, we’ve gotten
nothing but news, books, movies, and etc. that teach us to admire
Jews, feel sorry for Jews, love Jews, hug Jews, favor Jews, support
Jews, feel awed by Jews, make way for the Jews, etc. Jews viciously,
rabidly, and virulently attack any criticism of Jewish power. Jews are
usually paranoid, demeaning everyone who probe into Jewish power and
influence as neo-Nazis. Jews are the most hysterical group in this
country. If you oppose illegal invasion, ‘gay marriage’,
multiculturalism, gun bans, and political correctness shoved down your
throats and up your arses by the media and academia, you are called a
‘racist’, ‘xenophobe’, ‘homophobe’, and so on by the Jewish liberal
elite. And, invariably, someone compares you to a neo-Nazi or a closet
Hitler-lover since only a totally evil person can be against open
borders and ‘gay marriage’. Funny, aint it? The very people who bitch
and whine about the paranoia of ‘red-baiting’ during the era of Joseph
McCarthy are hysterically screaming “NAZI!” every time someone
displeases the Jewish establishment.


Anyway, philosemitism or Judeificaition is the law of the land because
(1) constant barrage of hug-a-Jew movies, books, TV shows, school
curriculum, and news coverage and (2) any criticism of Jews–no matter
how mild–is met with rabid and virulent hostility from the all-
powerful Jewish establishment which control the flow and nature of
information in the US and even in Europe.
So, it is disingenuous when Jews complain about philosemitism and
about how it has, on rare occasions, created inconveniences for Jews
(especially in Israel). Of course, philosemitism has been a greater
boon than handicap for Israel. It is the blind philosemitism of the
Christian Right and much of America that made the support of Israel
into a major priority in American foreign policy. But, philosemitism
has been known to backfire, even to point where people who are
sincerely sympathetic toward Jews have been appalled by the actions of
the nation of Israel and venal Hollywood Jews. So basically, what
Jews want is a philosemitism without any leaks or bugs, one where Jews
can only be loved, hugged, and obeyed but never ever questioned or
critiqued. So, Jews are not against philosemitism per se but against a
philosemitism that may come back to bite the Jew in the ass. Jews
want to occupy the higher moral ground but don’t want to be judged by
higher moral standards.


When Jews say, ‘we want the world to treat us like any other people,
judge us like any other people, and deal with us like any other
people’, they are lying through their teeth; or, they are sincere but
can’t resist the advantages of philosemitism.
Also, Jews have this paranoia that even if legitimate criticism of
Jewish power is allowed, it will soon snowball into an avalanche of
all-out hostility, suspicion, and even hatred against Jews. Jewish
anxieties are not unfounded because all peoples generally tend to be
envious and suspicious of and hostile to a minority that gains
tremendous power over them. Jews have been that kind of minority all
through history. It is natural for majorities to be wary of Jews. This
great Judeophilia is a recent phenomenon, only made possible by the
Holocaust which filled the West with great guilt–even though most
white people had nothing to do with it but actually died in the 10s of
millions to defeat the Nazis(for which Jews show little gratitude).
Judeophilia is strange and unnatural because it’s about loving a
minority in your midst that has disproportionate power, wealth, and
influence–especially one that has done much to undermine and subvert
the values and institutions crucial to your race or nation’s survival.
No Holocaust, no Judeophilia.
Indeed, we would today be talking about Jews the way we talk about
Mexicans, Chinese, Russians, and Muslims had there been no Holocaust.
(Jews know this, which is why they are squeezing the Holocaust for all
its worth. It’s their golden goose when it comes who goy guilt.)
Minus the Holocaust, there would be no taboo against discussing Jewish
power since the West would not be burdened with guilt. Similarly,
suppose Europeans had killed 6 million Muslims in the Holocaust than
six million Jews. The taboo would probably be against badmouthing
Muslims.
But, even this isn’t necessarily true. The taboo against badmouthing
the Jew goes deeper than the Holocaust. Jews are a very intelligent
people. As such, they gained tremendous wealth, media control, and
intellectual dominance. They made the TV shows, movies, and
documentaries; they wrote and devised many of our textbooks. Jews are
so talented that even people who don’t like nor want to empower the
Jews go see Spielberg movies, watch TV shows, and consume other stuff
dominated by Jews. Even extreme rightwing types would rather see
Hollywood movies than third rate movies and documentaries made by
conservative goyim. And, everyone seems hooked on professional sports
though most of the franchises are owned by Jews. Anyway, the point is
Jews became criticism-proof because of the Holocaust AND because of
their ability to gain great wealth, control the information and
remembrance of history. After all, nearly 5 million Ukrainians died
under Stalin and his Jewish henchmen, but most people know nothing
about it because Ukrainians are not very smart, not very rich, and not
very clever(and the Jew-run media would rather prefer to bury that
horrible history). And, the world doesn’t know the great extent to
which Jews had been involved in the communist movements all over the
world that may have killed up to 100 million people.


Anyway, Jews fear any criticism because it may turn into an avalanche.
This is especially true since there has developed so much pent-up rage
at the Jews that never saw or never was allowed to see the light of
day. And in some quarters, this rage is only growing thanks to the
rise of internet and new sources of information that make more people
aware of the Jewish role in the election of Barack Obama and in the
policies that are so detrimental to white people and white power in
this country: open borders, ‘gay marriage’, gun bans,
multiculturalism, etc. So, Jews want to nip all criticism of Jews at
the bud.
During the Hundred Flowers Campaign, Mao Zedong briefly liberalized
the country and allowed, even encouraged, criticism of the Communist
Party. At first, there was only a trickle of criticism as the people
feared iron-fisted communist authority. But, more and more people took
the bait and began to air their grievances. Soon, it turned into a
torrent and then the dam burst. Mao freaked out and put an end to this
experiment soon enough. Those who had dared criticize the Communist
Party even in the slightest way were sent to labor camps or shot. Mao
had expected the criticism to be mild and controllable(and reverently
constructive). But, there was a lot of bitter and angry criticism of
the Communist Party that had secretly built up over 7 yrs. (Today, the
Chinese Communist Party operates the same way. It allows economic and
social freedom but no criticism of Party authority. Not even a little
bit, because even a little bit can turn into more and more until it
may turn into another Tiananmen Uprising. Similarly, Jews, like the
Chinese Communist Party, fear even the slightest criticism of Jews
because it might snowball into an avalanche of rage against all the
venal and evil things Jews had done to the white race since the 1960s.
Just like the Chinese Communists, American Jews want to distract us
with bread and circuses, with Hollywood entertainment and Hollywood
politics–Obama.) .
Jews feel the same way. Though Jews are always saying that they are
for honest and open criticism of Jewish power and influence, they
freak out at the slightest sign of such criticism. They go into a
hissy fit, get all rabid and virulent, hysterical and vicious. They
seethe with hatred and intolerance. They start acting like Mao or
Stalin. Jews act this way because they know that an open policy of
criticism of Jews will turn into an open season on the Jews. Yes,
Jews are not entirely wrong on this matter. If criticism of Jews is
allowed, it can’t be limited only to ‘reasonable’, ‘humble’,
‘sympathetic’, ‘grateful’, ‘polite’, ‘reverent’, and ‘constructive’
criticism. Much of it will be angry, bitter, and hostile–justifiably
so. Some of it will even be rabid, virulent, and downright crazy. But,
these kinds of passions will only be natural. Why?
For the same reason that the angry criticism of the Chinese Communist
Party was natural during the Hundred Flowers Campaign and during the
late 80s. People feel a need to criticize, condemn, denounce, call to
account, and even scapegoat those in power or positions of authority.
When the Chinese people were briefly allowed freedom, it was only
natural for them to harshly criticize the Communist Party–fairly or
unfairly–which had such a great power over their lives. Kids blame
parents, students blame teachers, the people accuse and blame those
in power. Just look at the ‘Bush Derangement Syndrome’–which the Jews
encouraged. Now, Bush was an idiot president, but was he really
Hitler, the Devil, Satan’s helper if not Satan himself, a totalitarian
thug who wanted to set up a Christo-Fascist State? No, but he was the
President, the most powerful man in America and the world. So,
naturally people in the US and around the world were harshly and
crazily critical of him. Having great power is a mixed blessing, a
double-edged sword. You can be admired and praised by the masses or
hated and resented by the masses. It all depends on the state of
affairs and/or public perception. So, even if the hatred and animosity
toward Bush was over-the-top in some quarters, it was not all that
surprising. It comes with the territory of having a great deal of
power, of having control over other people’s lives. Bush, unlike Mao
and American Jews, had no means to clamp down on all those hated and
denounced him.


Given the nature of Jewish power, influence, and privilege through
much of history, it’s not hard to understand why so many people came
to hate Jews. Though Jews and their allies say this hatred was an
irrational and inexplicable sickness of the European soul, it was
actually natural and inevitable. Not that it was right or justifiable,
but as Thomas Sowell has written in ‘Are Jews Generic?’, wealthy,
privileged, and influential/powerful middlemen communities(especially
if of ‘foreign’ or ‘alien’ origin) have always been distrusted,
envied, and/or hated universally around the world. In some cases, the
middlemen communities didn’t even have to be of alien origin.
Confucianism in China is philosophically very hostile to the merchant
class. And, what was Marxism but essentially an anti-middlemen
ideology? Middlemen, entrepreneurs, or capitalists make the money and
gain great power and influence. The masses resent them because the
have-lesses have always envied and feared the have-mores. And, the
intellectual, philosophical, artistic, aristocratic, and/or spiritual
class dislikes them because merchant or bourgeois economic power is
either uprooting, materialistic, or based on no consideration other
than ‘greed’. America has been somewhat different because of the vast
lands, vast opportunities, and a spirit of freedom and free enterprise
that made it possible for most people to believe in the ‘American
Dream’ of material success; even people who were not particularly rich
saw many ordinary people become rich, so there was at least the
feeling that anyone could succeed through hardwork or good luck.
Economic success through entrepreneurship came to be associated with
freedom and equal opportunity for all.


Also, because American religion had a kind of a salesman quality to
it, American spiritual culture wasn’t as anti-capitalist as the
churches in other nations. One of the reason why Americans may be more
religious than Europeans is because Christianity has been nakedly
turned into a mass commodity and sold all over America. Europeans
never developed the Bible Thumping kind of Christianity that you see
in the movie The Apostle(starring Robert Duvall). Because Europeans
maintained a dignified and traditional style of church worship, many
people were bound to lose interest in religion as society became more
mass-oriented, youth-centered, ‘liberated’, and demotic. But, American
religion kept up with a society that was becoming mass-oriented in
organization, message, feeling, and taste. In America, you can go to a
Church to boogie woogie–if you’re black–, or you can go to a giant
mega-mall church where they play rock music.
It may well be that the reason why Europeans are less religious than
us is NOT because they’re better educated or more intelligent but
because their churches never sold out to mass culture like the
American churches did. Because European churches had traditions going
back centuries, they could not turn overnight into discotecques or
rock concerts.
In America, by contrast, religion wasn’t moored to some sacred
tradition. Indeed, parts of America where church tradition is the
deepest–New England and Northeast in general–tend to be the most
secular parts of America; this is because those early churches tended
to be stricter and more tradition bound, which is to say they
maintained a sense of hierarchy in their practice if not in
admission. A casual person wouldn’t feel immediately ‘welcome’ in a
tradition bound New England church as he would in new Megamall church
or in some jiveass Baptist church where anything goes hallelujah.
What happened to tradition-bound churches in Europe and New England
also happened to high brow and serious art. Most people don’t pay
attention to classical music and traditional works of art because our
mass culture wants things be accessible, fun, and immediately
gratifying. High culture stands no chance in the pop culture world.
So, the success of religion in America may have less to do with the
greater religiosity of the American people but the greater
adaptability of American religion to mass culture. And, Europeans may
be less religious not because they are better educated, more
enlightened, or more intelligent but because their religion has not
‘kept up with the times’. Even among Latin Americans(both in and out
of the US), Protestantism is gaining over Catholicism because the
former, at least in the Americanized form, is much more mass-oriented
and populist. It’s more ‘fun’. Europeans are not more intelligent
nor sensible than us in most respects because they like the same
garbage we like. Just look at European TV, listen to European pop
music, read European newspapers, and so on. Sure, there is high
culture or serious culture in Europe, but most people don’t pay
attention to that and, as a result, they must all be state-funded. If
we look at what the masses of Europeans really like, it’s Rap music,
Hollywood movies, and American TV shows(and their imitations of
such). In other words, Europeans are addicted to trash, garbage, and
celebrity culture just as we are.
If European churches lose their inhibitions and go into pop culture
mode, there’s no telling what might happen in Europe. You might
actually see a revival of religion. But, is that the kind of religion
they want? Isn’t it ironic that America happens to be more religious
because the American forms of worship happen to be immature, ungodly,
and retarded–with jiveass black preachers yakking and jakking and
stupidass white preachers talking likes salesmen?
Anyway, this explains why capitalism and religion have been good
partners in America. America, with only indirect connections to the
European past and with a diverse population, was a land of individuals
and opportunities than that of unified traditions, grand intellectual
ideas, and etc. The grand American intellectual ideas are freedom and
individual liberty. Actually, they are more sentiments than full-blows
ideals that Ayn Rand tried to turn them into.
So, Jews were bound to face fewer opposition and hostility in the US.
The distinct hallmarks of Jewishness–entrepreneurship, adding to the
diverse mix, rootlessness, and etc–were not necessarily anathema to
Americans. Everyone who came to America had a nomadic soul in a way,
even if many settled in new communities where they put down roots.
(Indeed, that is the key difference between non-Jews and Jews. Non-
Jews are nomadic out of necessity; their ideal is to settle and plant
roots. Jews are nomadic as an ideal.) Even American Indians became
part of the nomadic community as many had to leave their ancestral
lands and settle in reservations foreign to their ancestors.


America was far more welcome to Jews than any European nation or
empire. Americans were also not burdened with the sin or crime of
antisemitism during WWII. Holocaust didn’t take place on American
soil by the hands of Americans; and, Americans died in great numbers
to defeat Nazi Germany. So, you’d think that Jews owe something to
gentile America. You’d think Jews would be grateful. You’d think we
would be able to stand and walk confidently around Jews who show us
respect. Jews didn’t like this state of affairs–where they owed us–,
so Jews concocted a way to undermine the moral authority, pride, and
confidence of white Americans. How? (1) Jews brought attention to
instances of discrimination against Jews in American society, and
those did indeed exist, some subtle, some blatant. But, we all know
that American discrimination against Jews was very mild compared to
American discrimination against other groups; also, discrimination or
no discrimination, Jews were succeeding fabulously in America; also,
American negative feelings about Jews had a good reason as
disproportionate number of Jews were involved in radicalism of various
kinds. But, since Jews own the media, they’ve made it seem as though a
US law firm that didn’t hire a Jewish Harvard graduate was one of the
greatest crimes that ever took place! (Never mind that Jewish
businesses usually favored fellow Jews and often discriminated against
blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and other whites.) (2). But, Jews also
focused on American injustice against minorities, especially blacks.
Since Jews couldn’t make much of a case of antisemitism against
America, Jews focused on black slavery, and then the Jews associated
the suffering of blacks with that of Jews in the Holocaust. That was
what the bogus PBS documentary “Liberators” was all about. “You blacks
and we Jews are fellow ‘victims’ of white racists” was the motto. In
other words, since Americans mistreated blacks(like Europeans
mistreated Jews), Americans might as well be equally guilty of the
Holocaust too. Jews don’t care that American whites didn’t commit any
genocide against blacks, and therefore any comparison of black
American experience cannot be compared to the Holocaust. . Whites
brought 300,000 blacks to America, and now there are more than 40
million. Some genocide!!! And, the number of blacks lynched since end
of Civil War to 1960 is less than 2000. Compare that to the 20 million
white Christians killed by Stalin and his Jewish henchmen.
Still, Jews made themselves criticism-proof in the US by associating
themselves with blacks. Since whites had been ‘racist’ against blacks,
whites had no right to criticize Jews since that would amount to
antisemitism, a form of racism.
Of course, we all know that Jews exploited blacks–athletes,
entertainers, singers, actors, etc–for a long time until only
relatively recently. (Of course, Jews in the porn business continue to
exploit ‘white trash’ by using them as ‘cum buckets’ for Negro studs.
Jews then give a large share of this profit to Israel so that the
Zionist goons can kill and rape Palestinians.) But, Jews have a
peculiar way of remembering history. When Jews did wrong to blacks,
Jews merely become part of the white race; so, we are told that whites
mistreated blacks in sports and entertainment(even though most of
those ‘whites’ were Jews). . But, when Jews helped blacks, Jews take
all the credit AS Jews. So, if Jewish Hollywood exploited blacks,
‘white guys’ did it. But, if Jews funded the NAACP, JEWS did it. It’s
no wonder so many people call Jews ‘dirty’. (3) Jews made a big fuss
about how US didn’t do enough to save the Jews in the Holocaust. So,
even FDR, a pro-Jewish President, is criticized for not allowing more
Jewish immigration or for not bombing railway lines to the death
camps. (Jews hardly condemn FDR for dispossessing and locking up
150,000 Japanese-Americans. American history dominated by Jews is
always about Jews, Jews, and Jews). (4) Jews have been making a lot
of movies and publishing lots of books about the Holocaust,
insinuating that the evil of Nazism wasn’t unique to Adolf Hitler but
to all of Western Civilization of which US is a part. So, Jews will
say what the Anglos did to the American Indians is like what Germans
did to the Jews. Never mind what the Jews did to the Canaanites. Never
mind what Jewish communists did to Russians, Ukrainians, Poles,
Lithuanians, Kazakhis, etc. Never mind what Jews did to the
Palestinians. Never mind that Jewish role in communism was one of the
main inspirations for National Socialism. Jews pick and choose
history to make themselves look totally blameless while everyone else
is made to feel guilty for the Jew.
So, we have Jews telling us to beware of Muslims because those evil
towelheads are dangerous to saintly darling little Jews. Jews say we
must stand up to Muslims because Muslims don’t like Jews in Europe and
in the US. But, which group caused more harm to Western Civilization?
Which group came up with communism? Which group is pushing open
border policy? Which group is destroying the morality of marriage?
Which group owns Hollywood which promotes miscegenocide of the white
race? Jews shit on us and then expect us to come to their aid against
Muslims.
Muslims are indeed a big headache and problem, let us stand up to them
for OUR interest, not for Jewish interest. If anything, we need to
stand up to Jewish power more than to Muslim power as Jewish ideas
which have done most to corrupt, weaken, and dissipate the West.


Anyway, the American frontier has been closed for some time now. All
that remains is the concept of the frontier in the existential and
metaphorical sense. We talk of coming up with new medicines, new
technologies, new systems, new ideas. There is always the frontier of
the mind, the frontier of political and social progress. But, there is
a fundamental problem with this new concept of the frontier. It is
abstract and inaccessible to most people. Back in the 19th century,
any family with a wagon could strike out West and stake his piece of
territory. Frontier was tangible, something you could see and feel.
And prior to rise of advanced science, even amateurs could come up
with practical inventions and make a fortune. Thomas Edison was not a
Great Genius like the Jewish computer geniuses and physicists of
today. So, great success was open to far more people before the rise
of hightech. But, mere inventiveness and cleverness will not go very
far these days. This is the age of high-tech and only the super-smart
can really get ahead. They are the ones who come to head the great
corporations in computers and other stuff. The reasonably intelligent
can learn skills, get a good job in these companies, and lead a pretty
good life, but they are mere drones within the system. The ability to
be truly independent and individualistic is open only to the supreme
geniuses in finance, science, high-tech, and medicine, etc.
Of course, smart people always had an advantage throughout history,
but as our science and technology advance, only the smartest of the
smartest can really find great success in the new world order. Back in
the days of Edison, even a person of average intelligence could
understand the mechanics of Graham Bell or Edison’s inventions.
Today, many of us wouldn’t understand modern computers, science, and
math even if we were given a chance to study them for yrs. Some of
this stuff is inaccessible to all except for the tiny percentage of
people with super intelligence. The paradox of our civilization is
that just as our technology grows more advanced, we are becoming more
ignorant of that thing that has greater power over us. Of course, many
kids learn to use and toy with all these new gadgets, but few
understand the real science behind them. How a TV worked was complex
enough. How advanced computer systems work is truly infinitely
complex. And, the technology grows more and more complex yet. So, the
frontier is still open only for the truly super smart. For the rest
of us, there is only waiting for the geniuses to come up with the next
great invention. And, since we are dumb, the only way the super smart
can make money off their inventions is by turning them into neat
little toys for us to play with. So, even as the technology grows more
complex, the more we become infantilized.


Philosemitism is a secular variation of the notion of the Chosen
People. Since modern secular Jews don’t believe in God, the notion of
the ‘chosen people’ have turned into idea of the ‘preferred people’.
We are told that Jews are to be preferred and/or prized over other
people because: (1) they suffered more than others; as a result, they
deserve more sympathy; actually not only sympathy but also feelings of
guilt on the part of goyim since all of goy kind are said to be
responsible for the persecution of Jews. We are told that ancient
Egyptians were nasty to Jews. Babylonians were nasty to Jews. Romans
were nasty to Jews. Europeans were nasty to Jews. Muslims and Arabs
were nasty to Jews. And, the whole world is nasty to Jews because the
UN condemns Israel or because nations like Russia and China have
business deals with enemy nations of Israel. So, we should all feel
guilty. Of course, all the nasty and brutal things Jews did to other
peoples are underplayed; we don’t much hear of Jewish genocide of
Canaanites, the wars of aggression waged by Israelites, the role Jews
played in nomadically going from one place to another and undermining
the value system of the majority goyim. We don’t hear of Jewish role
in the Medieval white slave trade. We don’t hear of Jewish
collaboration with the gentile elite to tax and exploit the masses of
peasants. We don’t hear of Jewish role in finance capitalism. We don’t
hear of Jewish role in communism. No, all events and movements in
history are twisted and distorted so as to show that ONLY Jews were
the primary victims. We know, for example, that Jews were the biggest
promoters of communism; not just in communist nations but in free
nations. American Jews did a great deal to promote far left ideas in
the US and all over the West. But, when we hear of victims of
communism, we mainly hear of Soviet Jews. We are never told that
Soviet Jews became victims of a system of their own creation. Seeing
Soviet Jews as the main victims of communism would be like regarding
Germans as the main victims of Nazism. True, all Germans eventually
got burned by Nazism and suffered a great deal, but who created and
supported Nazism in the first place and turned it into a destructive
force? The Germans. So, Germans were victims of their own creation.
Soviet Jews too were the victims of the system of their own creation,
but media and academia run by Jews and their sheepish goy allies(or
puppets) suppress the part about Jewish role in communism and vastly
overplay the Jewish victimhood under communism. Just as some Germans
stick to the ‘good German’ myth, many Jews stick to the ‘good Jew’
myth. We know that most ‘good Germans’ turned against Nazism only
after defeat seemed eminent in WWII. And, we know that many Jews
turned against communism ONLY because the control of Soviet communism
eventually fell into the hands of goyim who didn’t particularly like
Jews. (2) Jews are just so lovable and funny. Jews are indeed funny
because they are intelligent and have superior wit. It’s no accident
that so many of the great comedians and music composers have been
Jewish in the modern era because good music and great humor depend on
wit and brilliance. Germans are good at many things but aren’t much
good at comedy. Indeed, comedy around much of the goy world amounts to
little more than slipping on banana peels. Most of the great witty and
brilliant comedy are Jewish. So, it’s true that Jews can be fun. Who
doesn’t like Don Rickles and Marx Brothers? Since Jews are fun, they
are great, right? True to an extent. But, we must remind ourselves
that much of Jewish humor actually target us. Even most Woody Allen
jokes are really on us. Sure, he makes fun of ugliness of Jews, Jewish
anxiety, Jewish neurosis, and etc. But, all said and done, all his
movies ask, “Aren’t I lovable, cute, wonderful, and totally
harmless... even as I piss on all the values that mean something to
the goy kind?” To be sure, Jewish wit and humor aren’t always
necessarily committed to destroying the goy moral order. Sometimes,
Jews just act crazy because they can’t help themselves. Restless due
to their fierce mental powers & energy AND enamored of their own
brilliance, Jews can’t help poking fun and undermining everything;
Jews are kinda like an hyperactive kid. All cultures produce such
people, but Jewish clowns tend to be more subversive and dangerous
because Jewish wit simply goes further and because Jews simply have
more mental energy to expend. Jews also feel extra-clownish and
subversive because they are surrounded by a vast ocean of dimwit
goyim. This fact can inspire either sobriety or subversiveness on the
part of the Jew. If the goyim are united and suspicious, Jews will act
sober, afraid to rock the boat and upset goyim. But, if the goyim have
been turned into valuefree decadent idiots, the Jews will have a field
day ‘dickslapping’ and ‘cumming’ all over the goyim. It’s the nature
of the Jew. Jews look at us as dogs because we are less intelligent.
Though some people refuse to accept the intellectual superiority of
Jews, we need only to look at the winners of Nobel prizes in science
and medicine. And, most of the innovations in computer and other high-
tech have been made by Jews. And, Jews have been most talented in
coming up with massive business models. Whether one likes these models
or not, no one can deny that they are formidable organizational
blueprints and undertakings. Just as some dog owners just can’t help
playing with their pets and making them do crazy things, Jews can’t
help making fun of us and driving us crazy. An dog owner will throw a
stick into the water, and the stupid dog will jump in and get all wet
to fetch the stick. Similarly, Jews cannot help manipulating us
because it’s amusing to them. Whether through capitalism or
communism, through religion or secularism, goyim have followed the
Jews. Jesus was a Jew. Marx was a Jew. Freud was a Jew. Betty Friedan
was a Jew. Spielberg is a Jew. Jews do, stupid goyim follows like
gullible dogs that they are. But, what do you expect? The intelligent
have always manipulated the less intelligent. (3) It’s NOBLE to love
a Jew, we are told. This message is tied to (1) and (2) but should be
considered separately. Through the media and academia, we are not
only told that Jews are lovable but that the best kind of goyim is one
that helps or loves the Jew. Consider the movie ‘Schindler’s List’.
Why is Schindler such a good guy? He saved Jews. Indeed, there is a
genre in cinema that should be called SAVE-A-JEW movie. Hollywood has
made a good number of them, but they are sprouting all over Western
and Eastern Europe too. Go to any videostore and the foreign video
section will have movies from Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania,
Hungary, France, Sweden, Norway, etc, etc that are about Jews being
helped and saved by good goyim.(It’s like kinda Lassie Come Home
remade as Goy Come Home. Good goy is the ever-faithful dog of the
Jewish master.) This is rather odd, especially in Eastern Europe,
considering that anti-Jewish feelings are not rare in that part of the
world. But, consider the fact that people in the media tend to be of
the Left. And, many of the film makers in Eastern Europe have been
Jewish. Also, these nations want movies that sell and make a profit,
and they know that SAVE-A-JEW movies will receive much greater
attention in America which is totally dominated by Jews. For example,
if an Eastern European movie is about saving Ukrainians, American
media wouldn’t pick it up. But, if it’s about saving Jews, you bet
that Miramax or some Jewish movie company will distribute it, and
every public library will carry that title. Also, European nations
know that they need the blessing and approval of worldwide Jewry in
order to succeed and do business; so, they feel obligated to produce
their share of SAVE-A-JEW movies for the sake of international image.
And, some of these nations even erect Holocaust memorials, also mainly
for the sake of public relations worldwide. It’s similar to Putin’s
use of Solzhenitsyn. Though Putin is something of a mild neo-
Stalinist, he knows that Stalin is considered a mass killer all over
the world. So, he has made token gestures showing that he is very
mindful of the evil aspects of Soviet Union under Stalin.


Anyway, philosemtism, Judeification, or Judeophilia has turned into a
sick disease. Admiration of or sympathy for Jews is understandable as
all peoples have something good about them. Indeed, there is much that
has been very great and profound about Jewish accomplishments,
history, and heritage. Even so, Jews are human after all, and all
peoples have a dark side to their history. The dark side of Jewish
history has been hidden from light. We admire much of German and
Japanese culture and history but we openly discuss the dark sides of
those cultures. And, we say that those dark aspects led to Nazism and
Japanese militarism. We also know that there are things in culture
that cannot easily be separated into good and bad. Take Wagner for
instance. A very great musical genius, but there is a very dark and
dangerous side to his music. Or, take the samurai culture of Japan. In
many ways, it was magnificent, admirable, and impressive. It was also
oppressive, inhuman, and merciless. There are cases where we can
separate the good vs bad rather easily. Kicking a harmless dog is bad,
pure and simple. But, concepts like national pride and honor can be
both good and bad. Tribalism can be both good and bad. It can be about
appreciation of and loyalty to one’s own people; it can also mean
racial or cultural arrogance and/or contempt for different peoples.
Universalism also can be both good and bad. It can mean all of
humanity sharing basic principles of human rights and dignity. It can
also mean forcing all of mankind to adopt what YOU believe is the ONLY
way for people to be ‘liberated’ or
‘redeemed’. Communism was universalism gone crazy. Nazism was
tribalism gone crazy. Islamic radicalism is both universalism and
tribalism gone crazy. Islam is culture-specific, and as such, it is
tribal. But, it tries to spread the faith and customs to ALL MANKIND.


Anyway, there is much in Jewish history, culture, and heritage that is
dark and sinister(as there is much that is noble and profound). But,
we are not allowed to discuss the dark or evil side of Jewish history
or culture. We are told that such should be discouraged or suppressed
because Jews too often have been the targets and scapegoats of goy
rage, hatred, and paranoia. In other words, because we don’t want
another Holocaust, we should even shut down legitimate criticism of
Jewish power BECAUSE legitimate criticism may turn into extreme
criticisms which may turn into totally crazy condemnation of all
things Jewish. The Jews see us as hopeless alcoholics when it comes to
anti-Jewishness. Just as AA demands that alcoholics not touch a drop
of liquor since alcoholics simply cannot control their drinking
habits, Jews figure that we should not even sip a single drop of anti-
Jewish sentiments because it will invariably lead to another
Holocaust.
If Jews can scientifically prove that criticism of Jews will to
another Holocaust, I might be inclined to agree with Jewish fears, but
this really just self-serving, hypocritical, and paranoid lunacy on
the part of the Jews. Besides, we can make a similar counter-argument
against the Jews. We can say, ‘when Jews took power in Russia, they
embarked on a social experiment that created a vast slave state and
killed over 20 million people. Since that’s what invariably and
inevitably happens when Jews take power, we must not allow Jews to
take any power ANYWHERE. Just as alcoholics cannot handle liquor and
shouldn’t even touch a drop of alcohol, Jews shouldn’t get a hold of
even a little bit of power because Jewish power invariably leads to
Jewish control of everything and the destruction of the goy majority.
Think of the mass murders, the slave camps, and ruthless
repressiveness of communist countries. Think of what happened to the
Palestinians. Look at what’s happening to whites in America. If the
Holocaust can be used as a reason for banning ALL criticism of Jewish
power, the Boshocaust–which claimed perhaps up to 100 million lives
worldwide–can be used as a reason for banning ALL forms of Jewish
power and influence. Jews believe that criticizing Jews leads to the
Holocaust, so there must be NO criticism of Jews. Okay, then I say
that Jews gaining power leads to the Bolshocaust, so there must NO
power in the hands of Jews.


Look at what the Jews are doing to white goy Americans, a people who
did more for Jews than any other people. Where do you see any
gratitude? Where do you see any appreciation? (I thought Spielberg
showed us some appreciation when he made Saving Private Ryan, but he
was one of the main supporters of Barack Obama, a stealth Marxist
black-nationalist. Jew Spielberg and his cronies thought Obama could
be a useful puppet of Jewish interests. We simply cannot trust any
liberal Jew, even a moderate liberal Jew. Making Obama–the friend of
Wright and crazy Ayers–the Commander-in-Chief of the US armed forces
is the biggest insult to Americans in the history of this country.)
From the first arrivals in the late 19th and early 20th century, many
Jews were Marxists and anarchists. Through the 30s, 40s, and 50s, more
Jews were pro-communist than anti-communist. In the 60s, Jews did
everything to aid and abet Fidel Castro and Ho Chi Minh. Jews in the
Soviet Studies and China Studies departments were often apologists for
communism if not exactly communists themselves. Magazines like The
Nation and New Republic were on the side of Stalin. New York Times
regularly hired reporters of Marxist bent who blamed white gentile
Americans for all the woes around the world. Today, Jews are forcing
open borders on us. They are promoting miscegenocide whereby white
women have black babies with black men. Jews have been able to do
this by something other than naked force. 2% of the US population
cannot physically force the vast white majority. No, Jews did this by
gaining control over our eyes, ears, hearts, and minds. They control
the academia and produce the textbooks. They control publishing and
print mostly liberal and leftist books. Sure, there are conservative
books, but notice that conservatives books cannot veer too far to the
right whereas leftist books can veer to the far left. In other words,
Barnes and Noble and Borders Books will sell tons of books on and by
Noam Chomsky and Che Guevara(and 1000s of other ilk) but will not
carry books by David Duke or Kevin MacDonald.
And, even stupid conservative thinkers use the far right as the
yardstick of evil. So, when some lowlife radical leftist filmmaker
comes along, even conservatives will compare such filmmaker with the
Nazi director Leni Riefenstahl than with communist directors like
Sergei Eisenstein or Dziga Vertov. Or, Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh
will attack the Left by associating it with Nazis instead of with
communists. Limbaugh should have called feminists ‘femi-commies’ or
‘femmunists’, but the stupid fat ape called them ‘feminazis’. Coulter
compared Willie Horton with Horst Wessel. Either these stupid
conservatives are really ignorant of communist history, or they too
are afraid of the liberal Jews who control the publishing and radio
industry. And, of course Jewish conservatives always denounce Muslims
by comparing them with Nazis than with communists–though Islamic
radicalism has more in common with communism. Though Islam is a
religion and communism is atheist, they share a common historical and
moral source–the Judeo-Christian tradition. Nazism was revival of
European paganism!! It was tribal and anti-universalist whereas
Christianity, Islam, and Marxism are all universalist.


If the extreme consequence of criticizing Jewish power and influence
is another Holocaust, the extreme consequence of not criticizing
Jewish power and influence is another Bolshocaust. Also, it’s not as
though Jews leave us alone because we leave them alone. Through a
Culture of Contempt and Subversion, Jews are constantly criticizing us
(even though we do nothing but praise Jews 24/7) and many other
peoples. Jews bitterly, rabidly, virulently, tenaciously, and
viciously attack Mormon power, Christian Right power, Chinese power,
Muslim power, Japanese power, French power, German power, Russian
power, and etc. Jews constantly attack Catholics. Jews demean the
history of Europeans and other folks. Though Jews were financially at
the core of the West and profited from capitalism, imperialism, and
globalism more than any other people, Jews are always attacking non-
Jews for the evils committed under those systems. Jews say it’s
antisemitic to criticize Jewish treatment of Palestinians, but
American Jews love to point out what whites did to blacks in the South
or what Afrikaners did to blacks in South Africa. (Of course, Jews
conveniently forget that Israel was a very close ally of South Africa.
Jews also hardly mention the fact that Israel is close to Turkey, a
nation that still denies the genocide of the Armenians! In other
words, genocide and human rights are really just a cynical ploy on the
part of Jews to serve their own interests).


There are indeed nations where hatred of Jews is a problem, but it
isn’t a problem in the West. Sure, there are pockets of neo-nazis and
such ilk in the US and EU, but they are far outnumbered by leftist
radicals who dominate culture, arts, media, and academia(not least
because they are intellectually more serious, better-read, more
curious, and creative). 98% of Americans say they would vote for a
Jewish person as President. For Chrissakes, where is the rabid Jew-
hatred in this country? The main problem, as far as I can see, is
blind and mindless Jew-love, which is pathetic since Jews feel mostly
contempt for white gentiles. Jews regard all conservative whites as
closet-Nazis and they regard liberal whites as their putty pet dogs.
Jews see right-wing whites as rabid dogs who won’t obey and see
liberal whites as their running dogs who roll over when told to do so.
Jews despise both groups, but of course favor the latter because a
running dog obeys orders. Jews are using Political Correctness as a
vast human Obedience School to make all of us fetch and roll over
whenever they want us to. Jews want white male dogs to roll over and
want white female dogs to stick their behinds to black male dogs. Jews
want to mongrelize the entire white race so that white pride and
identity will be gone forever, whereupon Jewish power will be
permanent.



Jews are expert chess players, and this is how they see history. We
must never trust what the Jews write but learn to read between the
lines. 99% of things said and written by people are lies. We all wear
masks. We must look behind the mask and see the real face. Though
antisemites through the ages exaggerated Jewish evil, there is a dark
side of Jewish history and culture that we must look straight in the
face and be vigilant against.


Today, Jews feel safe in the US. But, Jews want more than the feeling
of safety. They also want POWER, more POWER than anyone else. For a
small minority to have excess power, wealth, and influence is always
tricky because people take notice and grow resentful and distrustful.
So, Jews want to create social and political conditions whereupon
their power will be permanently secure forever and ever and can never
ever be challenged. (Like champion chess players, Jews are looking 10
moves ahead into the future.) Since Jews can never be a demographic
majority in the US, they have to use other means to secure their
permanent dominance in the US. The main weapon is to weaken the
feelings of pride and unity among their main goyim rival–the white
majority. Prior to the Hispanic illegal invasion, Jews used American
blacks and worldwide communism to counter the power of the white
majority. Jews used blacks to morally shame and scare whitey. But,
Jews overplayed this card, crime shot up, and many whites actually
turned Republican. Jews also used the specter of world revolution to
fill the West with guilt and shame over the history of imperialism.
But, communism turned out to be a massive fraud, and Jews no longer
wished to be associated with it. As they owned the media and academia,
Jews were able to whitewash their role in communism. Also, even though
Jews played whites vs blacks, many blacks came to hate Jews, and Jews
came to fear an alliance of whites and blacks against Jews even if
such alliance was mainly opportunistic and practical than deep.
What Jews had left were pop culture, media, and illegal immigration.
Though Jew continued to use blacks against whites, many Jews
discovered that rise of black power wasn’t necessarily good for Jews.
Indeed, hatred and suspicion of Jews were a bigger problem in the
black community than in the white community. Jews know that most
Hispanics don’t care much for Jews, but if Hispanics become the other
big minority in the US, blacks must compete for attention and
sympathy. Since blacks have to compete with Hispanics–another poor and
‘victim’ group–, blacks are more likely to be accommodating with Jews.
So, Jews want to use blacks and Hispanics against one another, and
then use blacks and Hispanics against the Whites. This way, with
whites, Hispanics, and blacks at odds with one another, Jewish power
will be safe and permanent. Jews are so paranoid and crazy about power
that they are willing to destroy white/western civilization just to
safeguard their own interests. That is the WAY OF THE JEW.


Anyway, philosemitism, Judeification, or Judeophilia would not be
dangerous IF Jews didn’t hold so much power, have committed great
evils in the modern era(especially through communism), and are pushing
policies that are sure to destroy the white race forever. After all,
there has been a American-Indian-philia as well which has been pretty
harmless. During the days of the frontier, Indians were seen as the
savage that stood in the way of the white man and progress. In the
wars between the white man and the Indian, the whites won totally, and
Indians were driven into reservations. But, over time, the American
Indian came to be regarded as Noble, Spiritual, and all that stuff; he
became romanticized and idealized, especially in movies like Dances
with Wolves. The idealized image of the Indian has little to do with
reality. There was much that was indeed noble and beautiful about
their customs and way of life. And we must honor their courage in
putting up a tough fight for their land, culture, and women. But,
American Indians were also ruthless, bloody, and not-so-nobly savage
as well. But, it doesn’t matter if we no longer criticize American
Indians. The fact is American Indians don’t have power in this
country. They live on welfare and Casino revenues. They have no
control over Hollywood, media, academia, government, etc. In the cases
where we hear of Indian issues, it’s usually through Jewish and
liberal spokesmen rather than from Indians themselves. So, American-
Indian-philia, whether smart or dumb, is immaterial and
inconsequential.
But, philosemitism, Judeification, or Judeophilia is dangerous because
it makes us drop our guard against the most formidable power in this
country and possibly the world. Jewish power is tremendous. Jews are
not only disproportionately dominant economically, culturally, and
intellectually, they are out to destroy our interests, our power, our
pride, our influence. If American-Indian-philia is simply love of the
American Indian, Philosemitism isn’t simply love of the Jew. It means
being defenseless against the Jew who is out to get you. It means Jews
get to use you, abuse you, exploit you, insult you. It means the Jew
gets to rape you but you have to buy flowers and chocolates for the
Jew for raping you. Consider the behavior of American conservatives.
Jews are doing everything to undermine their values, power, and
influence. Yet, these same stupid conservatives are going overboard to
praise Jews, hug Jews, kiss Jews(in the ass), and support whatever
Jews do in Israel. And, when things go badly in the Middle East, the
Jews blame it all on white conservatives, but white conservatives
support Jews even more. How more pathetic can you get?


Philosemitism says Jews are perfect just like American-Indian-philia
says Indians are perfect. Of course, there’s no way to measure human
perfection scientifically so we’re dealing with ‘spiritual’
perfection. It means there’s something inherently and intrinsically
noble, deep, beautiful, and wonderful about these people. It’s
hogwash. But again, it doesn’t matter with American Indians because
they are powerless. If our job is to speak truth to power, there is
very little we need to say to Indians who have little power and little
money(even with all those Casinos–mostly run by Jews, at any rate).
In contrast, we must speak truth to Jewish power, but we cannot speak
this truth because philosemitism or Judeification has spiritualized
Jews into angels.
Of course, we know there are evil individual Jews like Bernie Madoff
and others, but notice that the burden of guilt isn’t placed on the
Madoffs or on the Jewish community. No, the bigger burden is put on us
for potentially thinking, ‘hmm, lots of Jews involved in shady
business and crookedness.’ So, it’s less of a crime for Jews to do
evil than for us to take notice of it. So, if a bunch of Jews were to
rape your mother and daughter, their crime would be less grave than
the fact that you noticed that a bunch of Jews did it. We saw
something similar during the Obama campaign–orchestrated by Jews. It
was no sin for Obama to have associated with the likes of Rev. Wright
or Bill Ayers. Oh no, that was perfectly okay. It was deemed a much
bigger sin to have taken notice that Obama has extreme and hateful
allies. Same thing was true in the 1940s and 1950s. As far as Jewish
liberals were concerned, it was a much less of a crime to be a closet-
communist or a communist sympathizer than to have blown the whistle on
communist espionage and subversion. There has been a spiritualization
not only of Jews but of the Left and non-whites. This is why if a
college gives tenure to a communist, the moral burden isn’t on the
university who hired a radical but on those who denounce such a
promotion. Since the left is said to be on the ‘right side of history’–
even if they made ‘mistakes’–, leftists are considered to be saints,
sages, and angels. To complain of leftist radicals being given
positions of power would be McCarthyism or paranoid red-baiting. But,
if a college gave tenure to a neo-Nazi scholar, you bet leftists,
liberals, and even many conservatives would be calling for an
immediate dismissal and cut-off of all funds to the university. In
other words, a college can hire a 1000 Noam Chomskys but it better not
hire a single David Duke. This is what philosemitism has wrought.


Philosemitism, Judeification, or Judeophilia always finds a way to
deflect criticism from the Jews. We saw this when the story of Bernie
Madoff hit the news. The media warned that antisemites would run with
this, that it was the best Christmas gift to neo-Nazis since Madoff
had mostly hurt fellow Jews and gave Jews a bad name. Never mind the
much more numerous gentile victims of Bernie Madoff. Never mind the
great majority of great financial criminal minds in recent times have
been Jewish. Never mind all that. Just focus on the fact that people
like Bernie Madoff might lead people to question the power, influence,
and wisdom of Jews.
And, there is no middle ground between Jew Love and Jew Hatred
according to the Judeophiles. If you don’t totally love the Jew, you
must be a Jew hater. “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.”
Though Jews accuse George W. Bush of promoting a rigid kind of
Americanism where it’s ‘either our way or the highway’, Jews promote
their interests, their power, and themselves the same way. We must
love and appreciate the Jew with total obedience and reverence;
otherwise, we are a bunch of antisemites.
Yes, there are indeed some people who would love to use examples such
as Bernie Madoff to spin wild conspiracy theories about the Jews and
to demean ALL Jews. But, most critics of Jewish power aren’t like
that. Most critics of Jewish power respect and admire much in the
Jewish community and know that our society is indebted to Jewish
genius, brilliance, and hard work. But, who can deny the dark side of
Jewish power especially since Jews are so powerful? Also, Jewish power
is protected because (1) media, the so-called watchdog, are owned by
Jews, and we know a lot of Jews watch out for one another. Many Jews
in the media, Wall Street, and Washington have shielded the shysters
who were behind the recent economic collapse. The media would have
been far more aggressive in going after these crooks if Wall Street is
the playground of German-Americans or Greek-Americans. (2) Non-Jews
are afraid to criticize Jews since ANY criticism of Jews is labeled as
‘antisemitic’, whereupon the critic is sure to be blacklisted and have
his career ruined. (3) And since generations of Americans have been
brainwashed by Jewish media, most Americans kneejerkedly think any
criticism of Jewish power is a form of neo-Nazism. There is a famous
scene in Blues Brothers where Belushi and Ackroyd drive Neo-Nazis into
the river. In other words, you get extra points for attacking the
enemies of Jews. Now, Neo-Nazis are pretty rotten people, but that
scene in Blues Brothers wasn’t really about Neo-Nazis per se. It was
about sucking up to Jews. It was as if to say the Blues Brothers are
sooooooooo good because they stand up for the Jews.


So, even when Jews do wrong, the blame never falls on the Jews. The
blame falls on people who may take notice that a lot of Jews are up to
no good. (The Jew media pull the same stunt when blacks act crazy.
Instead of blaming blacks for acting crazy and violent, the Jewish
media will say the main danger is not what the blacks did but how evil
white people might use the example of black criminality to ‘spread
hatred’. Blacks are not to be blamed; rather, the focus is on white
people who might ‘exploit’ black hatred and lunacy. Very sneaky, these
Jews.) In the 80s and early 90s, we discovered that a good number of
Televangelists and Christian Right folks were actually hypocritical
scam artists. The media went after them full blast. People like the
Bakkers got in huge trouble. No mercy was shown. The media narrative
was that there is something rotten in the Christian Right community,
and we must air it out completely. No one said, ‘we should go easy on
the dark side of the Christian Right lest the radical secular enemies
of the religion–Neo-Commies–exploit it as an opportunity to spread
hatred of religious folks’. Though communism killed tens of millions
of religious people, we don’t cut slack for evil Christians. If
there’s something rotten in the Christian community, we air it out and
discuss it openly whatever the consequences. Same has been true with
the Catholic priest scandal. There had indeed been a culture of
silence and violence within the Catholic hierarchy. Too many sexually
abusive priests had been allowed to remain in the church and even to
rise up the hierarchy. When this news broke, the media went full
blast to air all the dirty laundry. No one said, ‘this Catholic-
bashing could be exploited by radical leftists who spread communism in
the 20th century and slaughtered millions of Catholics.’ The burden of
guilt was fully upon the Catholic priests, the Catholic Church, and
the Catholic culture as a whole which had turned a blind eye to all
these problems despite the warnings through the decades. And, the
media treat the problems within the Mormon community the same way.


But, when it comes to the Jewish community, the burden of guilt falls
on the goyim than on the Jews EVEN WHEN it’s the Jews who’ve committed
acts of great wickedness and sneakery. The main finger is not pointed
at the Jews but at those who might think less of Jews because of what
has been exposed of the Jewish community. So, if you’re in a room full
of people, and if a Jew farts a truly nasty fart, the finger is not
pointed at the Jew but at the person who says the “Jew did it.” If a
Catholic, a Baptist, or a Mormon farts, the Jewish guy can say as loud
as possible, ‘the GOY did it’. But, if a Jew farts, you better pretend
the Jew didn’t fart at all. You better pretend that the terrible odor
doesn’t emanate from the Jew but from the room as a whole or even from
yourself for even daring to entertain the thought that the Jew did it.
How dare you!!!! Are you an antisemite or something?
In the recent financial crisis, the Jewish community–in government,
economic thinktanks, and in Wall Street–were the main fartmeisters,
but we are not supposed to notice it. We can fully take notice of the
rottenness within the Catholic Church, but we are not supposed to
notice the rottenness in the Jewish community. So, even though Bernie
Madoff and others like him blew massive farts, the burden of guilt
falls on those who say, “Jews blew the rotten egg farts.” Now, suppose
Wall Street were mostly controlled by WASPS. You bet the Jewish run
media would be attacking not only the individuals in the financial
sector but the whole WASPY old-boys-network and culture of special
connections, sweet deals, conspiratorial collusion, and whatnot. But,
since most of the big old bad boys are Jews, we are not supposed to
notice that the Jews farted. We are not also not supposed to notice
that these rotten Jews also supported Obama over McCain. We are not
supposed to notice that Obama’s administration is doing special favors
for Wall Street Jews. Of course, McCain would have done the same thing
as Jewish purse strings control both parties. Though the financial
sector gave more to Obama, it did give a considerable amount to McCain
as well.
Just think of how this all works. Jews in global finance mess things
all up, and then they get to pull all the strings–especially in
collusion with their Jewish media buddies. Of course, the liberal
media have been hard on Wall Street and financial sector but it hasn’t
been hard enough. It has pretty much buried the news about the ties
between the Jewish finance boys and Obama. And, it’s mostly for show
anyway. We know that liberal Jews in the media are in cahoots with the
big Jewish boys in finance. Though they have some ideological
differences, blood is thicker than ideological ink. The superrich
liberal Jews who run the media will not really go after the
superduperrich Jews in finance. Besides, on social and cultural
policies, the finance Jewish boys and media Jewish boys see eye to
eye. They both want to piss away national sovereignty of America and
promote social libertarianism and decadence so as to undermine the
fabric of the white moral order for the sake of permanent global
Jewish power based in the US.
Indeed, just look at how Hollywood and entertainment industry are in
cahoots with liberal news media. If the liberal news media are really
about going after the guys with Big Money who do crooked things, how
come Hollywood has gotten a pass all these years despite their
marketing of cultural sewage, their corrupt and crooked ‘creative
finance’, their materialistic and piggish lifestyles, and so on?
Because both Hollywood bigshots and media bigshots are liberal Jews.
All said and done, it’s all about Jewish power, Jewish influence, and
Jewish clout. And, on social and cultural issues, they see eye to eye.
They know their main priority is to undermine the moral fabric of
American whites. And, it’s happened tremendously fast. Hollywood
promotes miscegenocide on a huge scale whereupon more and more white
girls go with Negro males to have half-negro kids. Iowa, a Midwest
State has approved ‘gay marriage’. Iowa of all places! How could that
be? Iowa is not San Francisco. It’s the power of the Academia, TV,
Hollywood, News, and etc, all controlled by Jews. The Liberal Jew
poison spreads everywhere because media control the minds of all
Americans. Jews are devious but they know how to think and come up
with fun stuff that engages people’s hearts and minds(or lack
thereof). Most goyim are brainless dolts who just go along with others
say.


So, we must wake up to reality. We must reject philosemitism,
Judeification, or Judeophilia. It is dangerous because (1) Jews are
the most powerful people in this country and we need to ‘speak truth
to power’ (2) Jews are out to undermine us and destroy our race and
culture (3) failure or cowardice to criticize Jews means that even
when Jews do wrong, the blame never falls on Jews but on us instead.
I’m all for criticizing the Christian Right, the Catholics, Mormons,
and etc. I don’t care if millions of Christians of Catholic or
Orthodox Faith were murdered by totalitarian madness in the 20th
century. If there’s something rotten in those communities, we should
discuss it and air the dirty laundry. I don’t care if 3 million Poles
died in WWII and if Poland suffered under communism for 50 yrs. If
something is rotten in Polish history, culture, or nation, we should
discuss it openly. Similarly, I don’t care if millions of Jews died in
the Holocaust. The fact is we must discuss the dark side of Jewish
history, especially of how Jews were instrumental in the Bolshocaust
which killed over 20 million people in USSR alone. We must discuss the
Jewish role in the undermining and subversion of the white order in
the US.


It may well be that the Jews have already destroyed America and white
power forever. It may well be that the damage is now irreversible.
But, if we’re gonna go down, let us at least drag the Jew down with
us. If a Jew pushes you off the cliff, hang onto the Jew, and pull him
down with you. Jews are mocking, insulting, and murdering us, but as
we slide down the cliff, we should sink our claws into the Jew and
pull him down with us. If SW goes to Mexican Illegals, let us make
sure that Israel falls to the Palestinians. If Jews create conditions
where more and more whites are attacked by black crime, let us get
back at the Jews. If Jews are destroying us–and nothing can be done
about it–, at the very least we can destroy the Jews in the bargain.
It’s like when Hamlet was poisoned and dying. He knew he was finished
but he knew he could kill his enemy as he himself died. They all died,
but at least Hamlet got his sweet revenge. It may be too late to save
ourselves but we can get our revenge against the Jew who are doing to
us what Hitler always warned. Hitler was a lowlife scum, and his
crimes were evil. But, how ironic that Jews, who said Hitler was just
a paranoid lunatic, are indeed doing everything Hitler said the Jews
would do: destroy the white race through miscegenation, mass
immigration, and cultural decadence; Jews want whites to become like
those crazy and confused mulattos of Brazil. What with all the
cultural decadence plaguing the white goy, he has lost the will to
fight for his land, his woman, his honor, his people. White boys have
no sense of history, heritage, or pride. If we’re gonna fade away and
die as a people, the least we can do is ensure the destruction of the
Jews along with our destruction. Amen.