


Dear community,
I encountered some difficulties when computing a case with periodic constant heat flux boundary conditions. Following the nondimensionalization procedure shown in the Quick Start, I derived the following relations (the superscript “+” denotes nondimensional quantities). Could you please clarify how the nondimensional thermal conductivity, Λ+, is treated in the program? In particular, can the code shown in the red rectangle, param(8), be interpreted as 1/Pe rather than simply the thermal conductivity?
In addition, I modified the turbChannel case based on several references in order to avoid the issue of “unbounded temperature increase” that occurs in periodic constant heat-flux boundary simulations. Specifically:
0205: constant wall temperature boundary (temp = 1.0), qvol = vx(i,j,k,e) / 2330.0 (Pe = 2330)
0206: constant wall temperature boundary (temp = 1.0), qvol = vx(i,j,k,e)
0207: constant heat-flux boundary (flux = 1.0, temp = 0.0), qvol = vx(i,j,k,e)
Although the numerical values of the temperature field differ significantly in the ParaView visualization, they become close to each other after being processed using t_tau. Are such computational results reasonable?
Any suggestions and criticisms are appreciated.
Student W. T. Ma