Snek5000 0.9.0 released ! Feedback would be very useful
46 views
Skip to first unread message
PIERRE AUGIER
Jan 13, 2023, 10:45:37 AM1/13/23
to nek...@googlegroups.com
Dear Nek5000 users and developers,
A month ago, we sent on this mailing list an email (https://groups.google.com/g/nek5000/c/URtEh8DKrzs) on the new project Snek5000 (https://github.com/snek5000/snek5000). I think this small Python package can be useful to many Nek5000 users (see how in our tutorials https://snek5000.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials.html).
We've just released Snek5000 0.9.0 so Snek5000 is now really ready to be tried! The next steps for us are about finalizing the documentation and writing a short paper for the Journal of Open Source Software.
Anyway, any feedback from Nek5000 users (or even developers!) would be greatly appreciated. For a Nek5000 user, running a simulation with existing Snek5000 solvers should really be a matter of few minutes, and creating your own Snek5000 solver from your cases should also be quite easy.
I would love to know if people like/dislike the idea behind Snek5000 (and why)? Or to know if people managed (or didn't manage) to use it from what is given in our documentation and repository?
Cheers,
Pierre
--
Pierre Augier - CR CNRS http://www.legi.grenoble-inp.fr
LEGI (UMR 5519) Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels
BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France tel:+33.4.56.52.86.16
A month ago, we sent on this mailing list an email (https://groups.google.com/g/nek5000/c/URtEh8DKrzs) on the new project Snek5000 (https://github.com/snek5000/snek5000). I think this small Python package can be useful to many Nek5000 users (see how in our tutorials https://snek5000.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials.html).
We've just released Snek5000 0.9.0 so Snek5000 is now really ready to be tried! The next steps for us are about finalizing the documentation and writing a short paper for the Journal of Open Source Software.
Anyway, any feedback from Nek5000 users (or even developers!) would be greatly appreciated. For a Nek5000 user, running a simulation with existing Snek5000 solvers should really be a matter of few minutes, and creating your own Snek5000 solver from your cases should also be quite easy.
I would love to know if people like/dislike the idea behind Snek5000 (and why)? Or to know if people managed (or didn't manage) to use it from what is given in our documentation and repository?
Cheers,
Pierre
--
Pierre Augier - CR CNRS http://www.legi.grenoble-inp.fr
LEGI (UMR 5519) Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels
BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France tel:+33.4.56.52.86.16
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages