NC: Marriage discrimination amendment bigots forge ahead; HRC gives ENC $10K for battle

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Sue Null

unread,
Mar 1, 2011, 11:03:45 PM3/1/11
to neighbors-f...@googlegroups.com
http://pamshouseblend.com/diary/18761/nc-marriage-discrimination-amendment-bigots-forge-ahead-hrc-gives-enc-10k-for-battle

NC: Marriage discrimination amendment bigots forge ahead; HRC gives ENC $10K for battle

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Mar 01, 2011 at 12:00:00 PM EST


These may be good old boys in our General Assembly, but they aren't stupid when it comes to political calculation. This year's marriage amendment, SB106, already has 23 sponsors - if it gets to the Senate it will pass if the chamber's 30 Republicans vote thumbs up.

The perennial sponsor, Sen James Forrester of Gaston County, is confident it will pass and make a splash at the polls in 2012, in the wake of the DNC holding its shebang in Charlotte. (N&O):

"Democrats may not like that it will bring out conservative Republicans and conservative Democrats to vote for it," Forrester said.

..."This is about sending a message that gay and lesbian people are second-class citizens," said Ian Palmquist, executive director of the gay-rights group Equality North Carolina. There's no likelihood of getting a successful challenge to the law through the North Carolina courts, Palmquist said.

There's some good news to report. 1) an Elon poll this week shows NC residents support same-sex partner recognition; and 56% of North Carolinians oppose an amendment; and 2):
The Human Rights Campaign, a national gay rights group, is giving Equality N.C. $10,000 for work to keep the question off the ballot.

Palmquist said its community organizer would work on getting ban opponents to call and e-mail legislators.

Obsessive "diversity is perversity" Mecklenburg County Commissioner Bill James, wasted no time in finding a microphone to bleat his bigotry.
"The purpose is not just to prevent Massachusetts people coming down," he said. "It's also to put a big letter of shame on the behavior. We don't want them here. We don't want them marrying. If you're going to do it in San Francisco, it's your own business."

In an e-mail last week, James predicted easy passage. "Bet it will pass with over 60 percent," he wrote. "The public in my opinion knows the difference between perversity and diversity."

The people are speaking out against the amendment. Here's a letter to the editor from the Wilmington Star News:
Why is Thom Goolsby (R-New Hanover) co-sponsoring NC Senate Bill S-106 "Defense of Marriage"? ...Are his rights in danger?

I think people who support this legislation are same people in history who; did not want woman to vote, did not want Blacks to have rights, and they most likely support other kinds of discrimination. They obviously feel they deserve more rights than the person standing next to them.

Gay marriage is inevitable. He's on the wrong side of the future. Thom, please get to work on our budget and helping the NC economy, and stop working on legislation that tries to Limit the rights of your fellow Americans.

John Howard
Wilmington

I was copied on a letter from a constituent to Sen. Rick Gunn, read it below the fold.
Pam Spaulding :: NC: Marriage discrimination amendment bigots forge ahead; HRC gives ENC $10K for battle
To Sen. Rick Gunn (R-Alamance, Caswell)
Dear Sir,

How dare you?! I am a gay man living with my long time partner here in the state I was raised. My partner is from Texas and one of the highlights of bringing him here, as I stated to him, was that NC is a more progressive state than Texas. That being said, I did not expect anywhere near the action going on now from my home state government.

How is it legal? How is it constitutional? How is it right? What have I done to your marriage sir? Because I sure as hell can tell you what your doing to mine! Not to mention the tax situation, but this kind of discrimination brings with it a focused ignorance and hatred upon some of the people you happen to represent.

I am innocent, Sir! And I did not start this. I've never really asked for much, but you can bet I will join with anyone who will listen to defeat this bill which you are helping to co-sponsor. You are helping to cost me time, aggravation, my rights and my future. And I ask you to stop, please, while the stopping is good. Don't you realize in your position the difference you can make positively on this state if you would focus energy not on how we are different but how we are alike and can work together. You NEED me sir. We both need each other to succeed, or NC will not succeed. I beg you for your political future and in the name of all things right and good in this world to pull your support from this bill and stop joining with those with an agenda of hate.

You are and can be better than this, Sir.

I did not vote for you, but I have met you indirectly in passing. You nodded hello to me, sir. In Burlington, on my way to work one morning. You were picking up your election signage. Did I appear then to be a threat to your marriage then? Did I not look like everyone else? My business is and should be the same as yours, sir. With a strive to make things better for my fellow man, wither or not I believe in his philosophy, religion or way of life. I deserve and am entitled to the same rights and privileges as you. I would not be so bold as to ask someone to take your rights away on a ballot. Hell I don't have the ability to marry right now anyway. How could you possibly think to make it worse!!

In closing, sir, if this is about your ideology, I kindly ask you to can it or stuff it, Sir. No matter your beliefs on the matter, the fact is the state should sanction nor condemn "religious" marriage. However, legal marriage, partner ship, domestic union, whatever the hell you want to call it is a right and privilege to all.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

That last part means you, Mr. Gunn. I implore you please, to do your duty and defend me, though you don't agree with me. At least then I could honestly say that you're an honorable and descent man, as I believe a person of your office should be.

Brent N. Jones

Haw River, N.C.



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages