Re: Issue 20 in neatx: Please add support for usermode authentication

[ne...@googlecode.com]

Comment #10 on issue 20 by n...@2thebatcave.com: Please add support for
usermode authentication
http://code.google.com/p/neatx/issues/detail?id=20

Are there any complete (non-hacked) clients that support usermode
authentication with neatx without this patch? If not, could we get a
configurable version of this change checked-in? It is a pain to keep
having to patch all of these machines managed by different people because
the fix isn't upstream in neatx. Freenx worked fine with usermode
authentication after a simple configuration change, but we have mostly
dumped freenx for neatx because neatx seems to be more reliable.

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

Good luck with that. The last published code change I see was
apparently in February. There's no forther changes, or comments on
planned changes, from kormat, not even in the branches.

On Dec 22, 1:00 pm, ne...@googlecode.com wrote:
> Comment #10 on issue 20 by n...@2thebatcave.com: Please add support for  

> usermode authenticationhttp://code.google.com/p/neatx/issues/detail?id=20

>
> Are there any complete (non-hacked) clients that support usermode  
> authentication with neatx without this patch?  If not, could we get a  
> configurable version of this change checked-in?  It is a pain to keep  
> having to patch all of these machines managed by different people because  
> the fix isn't upstream in neatx.  Freenx worked fine with usermode  
> authentication after a simple configuration change, but we have mostly  
> dumped freenx for neatx because neatx seems to be more reliable.

There have been no published changes in the neatx trunk since

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

And if you need to maintain your own local repository with upstream
merges pulled in and local changes, committed, consider using a git
repsitory with the gitsvn tools.