Magnetic Polar Shifts Causing Massive Global Superstorms
Leroy N. Soetoro
Superstorms can also cause certain societies, cultures or whole countries
to collapse. Others may go to war with each other.
(CHICAGO) - NASA has been warning about it.scientific papers have been
written about it.geologists have seen its traces in rock strata and ice
core samples.
Now "it" is here: an unstoppable magnetic pole shift that has sped up and
is causing life-threatening havoc with the world's weather.
Forget about global warming.man-made or natural.what drives planetary
weather patterns is the climate and what drives the climate is the sun's
magnetosphere and its electromagnetic interaction with a planet's own
magnetic field.
When the field shifts, when it fluctuates, when it goes into flux and
begins to become unstable anything can happen. And what normally happens
is that all hell breaks loose.
Magnetic polar shifts have occurred many times in Earth's history. It's
happening again now to every planet in the solar system including Earth.
The magnetic field drives weather to a significant degree and when that
field starts migrating superstorms start erupting.
The superstorms have arrived
The first evidence we have that the dangerous superstorm cycle has started
is the devastating series of storms that pounded the UK during late 2010.
On the heels of the lashing the British Isles sustained, monster storms
began to lash North America. The latest superstorm.as of this writing.is a
monster over the U.S. that stretched across 2,000 miles affecting more
than 150 million people.
Yet even as that storm wreaked havoc across the Western, Southern,
Midwestern and Northeastern states, another superstorm broke out in the
Pacific and closed in on Australia.
The southern continent had already dealt with the disaster of historic
superstorm flooding from rains that dropped as much as several feet in a
matter of hours. Tens of thousands of homes were damaged or destroyed.
After the deluge tiger sharks were spotted swimming between houses in what
was once a quiet suburban neighborhood.
Shocked authorities now numbly concede that much of the water may never
dissipate and have wearily resigned themselves to the possibility that
region will now contain a new inland sea.
But then only a handful of weeks later another superstorm.the megamonster
cyclone Yasi.struck northeastern Australia. The damage it left in its wake
is being called by rescue workers a war zone.
The incredible superstorm packed winds near 190mph. Although labeled as a
category-5 cyclone, it was theoretically a category-6. The reason for that
is storms with winds of 155mph are considered category-5, yet Yasi was
almost 22 percent stronger than that.
A cat's cradle
Yet Yasi may only be a foretaste of future superstorms. Some climate
researchers, monitoring the rapidly shifting magnetic field, are
predicting superstorms in the future with winds as high as 300 to 400mph.
Such storms would totally destroy anything they came into contact with on
land.
The possibility more storms like Yasi or worse will wreak havoc on our
civilization and resources is found in the complicated electromagnetic
relationship between the sun and Earth. The synergistic tug-of-war has
been compared by some to an intricately constructed cat's cradle. And it's
in a constant state of flux.
The sun's dynamic, ever-changing electric magnetosphere interfaces with
the Earth's own magnetic field affecting, to a degree, the Earth's
rotation, precessional wobble, dynamics of the planet's core, its ocean
currents and.above all else.the weather.
Cracks in Earth's Magnetic Shield
The Earth's northern magnetic pole was moving towards Russia at a rate of
about five miles annually. That progression to the East had been happening
for decades.
Suddenly, in the past decade the rate sped up. Now the magnetic pole is
shifting East at a rate of 40 miles annually, an increase of 800 percent.
And it continues to accelerate.
Recently, as the magnetic field fluctuates, NASA has discovered "cracks"
in it. This is worrisome as it significantly affects the ionosphere,
troposphere wind patterns, and atmospheric moisture. All three things have
an effect on the weather.
Worse, what shields the planet from cancer-causing radiation is the
magnetic field. It acts as a shield deflecting harmful ultra-violet, X-
rays and other life-threatening radiation from bathing the surface of the
Earth. With the field weakening and cracks emerging, the death rate from
cancer could skyrocket and mutations of DNA can become rampant.
Another federal agency, NOAA, issued a report caused a flurry of panic
when they predicted that mammoth superstorms in the future could wipe out
most of California. The NOAA scientists said it's a plausible scenario and
would be driven by an "atmospheric river" moving water at the same rate as
50 Mississippi rivers flowing into the Gulf of Mexico.
Magnetic field may dip, flip and disappear
The Economist wrote a detailed article about the magnetic field and what's
happening to it. In the article they noted:
"There is, however, a growing body of evidence that the Earth's magnetic
field is about to disappear, at least for a while. The geological record
shows that it flips from time to time, with the south pole becoming the
north, and vice versa. On average, such reversals take place every 500,000
years, but there is no discernible pattern. Flips have happened as close
together as 50,000 years, though the last one was 780,000 years ago. But,
as discussed at the Greenland Space Science Symposium, held in
Kangerlussuaq this week, the signs are that another flip is coming soon."
Discussing the magnetic polar shift and the impact on weather, the
scholarly paper "Weather and the Earth's magnetic field" was published in
the journal Nature. Scientists too are very concerned about the increasing
danger of superstorms and the impact on humanity.
Superstorms will not only damage agriculture across the planet leading to
famines and mass starvation, they will also change coastlines, destroy
cities and create tens of millions of homeless.
Superstorms can also cause certain societies, cultures or whole countries
to collapse. Others may go to war with each other.
A Danish study published in the scientific journal Geology, found strong
correlation between climate change, weather patterns and the magnetic
field.
"The earth's climate has been significantly affected by the planet's
magnetic field, according to a Danish study published Monday that could
challenge the notion that human emissions are responsible for global
warming.
"'Our results show a strong correlation between the strength of the
earth's magnetic field and the amount of precipitation in the tropics,'
one of the two Danish geophysicists behind the study, Mads Faurschou
Knudsen of the geology department at Aarhus University in western Denmark,
told the Videnskab journal.
"He and his colleague Peter Riisager, of the Geological Survey of Denmark
and Greenland (GEUS), compared a reconstruction of the prehistoric
magnetic field 5,000 years ago based on data drawn from stalagmites and
stalactites found in China and Oman."
In the scientific paper "Midday magnetopause shifts earthward of
geosynchronous orbit during geomagnetic superstorms with Dst = -300 nT"
the magnetic intensity of solar storms impacting Earth can intensify the
effects of the polar shift and also speed up the frequency of the emerging
superstorms.
Pole reversal may also be initiating new Ice Age
According to some geologists and scientists, we have left the last
interglacial period behind us. Those periods are lengths of time.about
11,500 years.between major Ice Ages.
One of the most stunning signs of the approaching Ice Age is what's
happened to the world's precessional wobble.
The Earth's wobble has stopped
As explained in the geology and space science website
earthchangesmedia.com, "The Chandler wobble was first discovered back in
1891 by Seth Carlo Chandler an American astronomer.
The effect causes the Earth's poles to move in an irregular circle of 3 to
15 meters in diameter in an oscillation. The Earth's Wobble has a 7-year
cycle which produces two extremes, a small spiraling wobble circle and a
large spiraling wobble circle, about 3.5 years apart.
For the conclusion of this article, visit: helium.com
http://www.helium.com/items/2083868-magnetic-polar-shifts-causing-massive-
global-superstorms
--
Obama's black racist USAG appointee.
Eric Holder, racist black United States Attorney General drops voter
intimidation charges against the Black Panthers, "You are about to be
ruled by the black man, cracker!"
Eric Holder, prejudiced black United States Attorney General settles the
hate crime debate, "Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws."
Nancy Pelosi, Democrat criminal, accessory before and after the fact, to
former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New
York's million dollar tax evasion. On December 3, 2010, Congress voted to
censure Rangel for 11 ethics violations. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
fought removal of Charles B. Rangel from the House Ways and Means
Committee.
Felony President. 18 USC, Sec. 600. Promise of employment or other
benefit for political activity
Obama violated the law by trying to buy Joe Sestak off with a political
appointment in exchange for not pursuing an election bid to replace Arlen
Specter. Obama violated the law by trying to buy former Colorado House
Speaker Andrew Romanoff off last fall to see if he'd be interested in an
administration job -- instead of running against Sen. Michael Bennet.
--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to ne...@netfront.net ---
Gunner Asch
--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".
George Plimpton
> So its not Gorbal Warming as the wankers said?
Global warming is happening too, wiebert-the-pussy. Global warming is a
fact - it isn't politics, it isn't "theory." Some ignorant farm
machinery tinkerers may argue about the cause of it, but the fact of it
is not in dispute.
Not sure if there's anything to this "superstorm" hyperbole below. For
certain, the language is unscientific and not even reputable writing by
a good science journalist writing in the popular press - far too many
"mega" prefixes for it to be sound writing.
emoneyjoe
wrote:
>On 8/9/2011 10:26 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>> So its not Gorbal Warming as the wankers said?
>
>Global warming is happening too, wiebert-the-pussy. Global warming is a
>fact - it isn't politics, it isn't "theory." Some ignorant farm
>machinery tinkerers may argue about the cause of it, but the fact of it
>is not in dispute.
It has to be warming, when the weather offices move
to major airports and/or more and more paving and buildings
are built around them with good drainage so there is no
moisture to evaporate most of the time, the temperature
must go up.
>Not sure if there's anything to this "superstorm" hyperbole below. For
>certain, the language is unscientific and not even reputable writing by
>a good science journalist writing in the popular press - far too many
>"mega" prefixes for it to be sound writing.
It may be more likely ice structures causing an
imbalance is the cause of the wobble rather than
the wobble causing anything.
And the number 11,500 years between ice ages
seems wrong.
Beam Me Up Scotty
> On 8/9/2011 10:26 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>> So its not Gorbal Warming as the wankers said?
>
> Global warming is happening too, wiebert-the-pussy. Global warming is a
> fact - it isn't politics, it isn't "theory." Some ignorant farm
> machinery tinkerers may argue about the cause of it, but the fact of it
> is not in dispute.
Give us these facts, so that we may understand.
Gunner Asch
Indeed. Please do. And advise how civilisation has caused all the pole
shifts in say..the last 250,000 years.
Im sure we would all be happy to review your graphs and whatnot.
Gunner
AGWFacts
<leroys...@usurper.org> wrote:
> Now "it" is here: an unstoppable magnetic pole shift that has sped up and
> is causing life-threatening havoc with the world's weather.
Crock of shit detected: viewing halted.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
have past civilizations been any factor
in causing the magnetic poles to flip?... all
of you folks who confuse that with a physical flip,
have a nice _______.
Catoni
>
> >>>http://classifieds.salem-news.com/globaltemp.php
I think you are confusing Ice Ages with Glacial Periods.... don't
feel bad... many people confuse the two.
We are still in an Ice Age.
The Quaternary glaciation, also known as the Pleistocene glaciation,
the current ice age, began about two and a half million years ago, and
is still going on.
As long as we have polar ice caps and ice sheets and glaciers.....
we are still in an Ice Age.
The last glacial period was the most recent glacial period within
the current ice age occurring during the last years of the
Pleistocene, from approximately 110,000 to 10,000 years ago. We are
presently in an Interglacial Period between Glacial Periods, in the
current Ice Age.
Perhaps a bit confusing.... but it's not too hard to learn.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
I forget the names of the ultimate & penultimate glacialtions, because
we usually talk about the shorter interglacials:
the last one was the Holocene, the prior, the Eemian [*],
the intimate one, we'll just have to wait for it, because
it's not over til the fat lady screams, and that only happens
when there is a lot of surplus twinkles.
* "Abrupt end of the Eemian interglacial, *sensu strictu*"
by G.Woillard, her palynology in the Grand Pile bog.
Catoni
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Quaternary Period is correct and refers to the most recent of the
three periods of the Cenozoic Era.
However, the term Quaternary Glaciation is also correct. It's also
known as the Pleistocene Glaciation and refers to the period of the
last few million years during which permanent ice sheets were
established in Antarctica and Greenland, and fluctuating ice sheets
have occurred elsewhere.
It's the present ice age that is still continuing and began about
two and a half million years ago.
The AGW Alarmists like to live in ice ages.
George Plimpton
Documented rise in average global surface temperature of approximate
0.74 degrees C in the 20th century. There is no serious dispute about
the rise in temperature. There is a tiny bit of irrational dispute over
the cause. The rise in the average temperature is an empirically
verified fact; it is not a "theory".
George Plimpton
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:28:01 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> <Then-Destro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 8/10/2011 2:15 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>> On 8/9/2011 10:26 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>>> So its not Gorbal Warming as the wankers said?
>>>
>>> Global warming is happening too, wiebert-the-pussy. Global warming is a
>>> fact - it isn't politics, it isn't "theory." Some ignorant farm
>>> machinery tinkerers may argue about the cause of it, but the fact of it
>>> is not in dispute.
>>
>>
>>
>> Give us these facts, so that we may understand.
>>
> Indeed. Please do.
See the direct response to the dweeb.
> And advise how civilisation has caused all the pole
> shifts in say..the last 250,000 years.
No one said civilization cause pole shifts,
wiebert-the-scientifically-illiterate-pussy.
emoneyjoe
wrote:
>On 8/10/2011 8:28 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
You are stating assumptions, not facts, the data set
only contains 200 years or less of data from weather stations
that have been moved, shut down, started up, had industrial
buildings and machines and air conditioning units built all
around them, and even the boxes holding the sensors
have been painted with different paint and the sensors
are only accurate to about 2 or 3 degrees F.
Just recently a lot of weather stations have been
moved from areas with trees nearby to airports with
nothing but well drained pavement and buildings.
So maybe in another 100 years enough data
will be available to make a better estimate of climate
change and an idea of what causes it.
emoneyjoe
George Plimpton
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:09:20 -0700, George Plimpton<geo...@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/10/2011 8:28 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2011 2:15 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/2011 10:26 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>>>> So its not Gorbal Warming as the wankers said?
>>>>
>>>> Global warming is happening too, wiebert-the-pussy. Global warming is a
>>>> fact - it isn't politics, it isn't "theory." Some ignorant farm
>>>> machinery tinkerers may argue about the cause of it, but the fact of it
>>>> is not in dispute.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Give us these facts, so that we may understand.
>>
>> Documented rise in average global surface temperature of approximate
>> 0.74 degrees C in the 20th century. There is no serious dispute about
>> the rise in temperature. There is a tiny bit of irrational dispute over
>> the cause. The rise in the average temperature is an empirically
>> verified fact; it is not a "theory".
>
> You are stating assumptions, not facts,
I'm stating facts. The ocean is heating up, and ships have taken the
surface water temperature for centuries. The temperature either has
risen over time or it hasn't - there is no "assumption" involved, you
stupid cracker.
emoneyjoe
wrote:
And you think taking the temperature near the surface tells
the total amount of thermal energy in the oceans which have
an average temperature near freezing?
The area near the poles get changing conditions as
currents change, even where rain falls can change which
direction water flows near the poles.
CO2 concentrations are rising, the jury is still out
on temperatures.
There is a natural tendency for a young data set of
temperatures to rise for a number of reasons. Just
fact that a record cold night in winter is more unusual
than a record warm day in summer makes a young
data set biased toward warming.
CO2 is the primary gas in the upper atmosphere
capable of radiating thermal energy to space.
I don't know where you learned science, but
I feel confident that the more there is of something
that can radiate heat away, the more heat will be
radiated away.
emoneyjoe
George Plimpton
You stupid, ignorant douche:
The average temperature of the ocean surface waters is about 17
degrees Celsius (62.6 degrees Fahrenheit).
http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/Water/temp.html
The average temperature in shipping lanes is rising - not in dispute.
George Plimpton
More at that same site explaining ocean temperature collection methodology:
There is a neat program that is measuring the temperature and
salinity of ocean surface waters around the world. The Argo
program deploys floats that measure salinity and temperature
throughout the surface layer of the ocean. Over 3,000 free-drifting
floats have been deployed all over the ocean and each float is
programmed to sink 2,000 meters down, drifting at that depth for
about 10 days. The float then makes its way to the surface
measuring temperature and salinity the whole time. Data is
transmitted to a satellite once the float reaches the surface, so
that scientists and the public have access to the state of the
ocean within hours of the data collection. At a greater depth in
the water, measurements are often made with a CTD instrument (CTD =
conductivity, temperature, depth), where the instrument is placed
in the ocean water from a ship or a platform. These instruments are
used by the Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS), where they
have been tracking ocean measurements like temperature, salinity
and oxygen concentrations for over 55 years.
The Argos and BIOS program have both published results that confirm
that the ocean is warming. Surface water temperatures obviously
change from season to season and year to year, but the whole ocean
has warmed about 0.1 degree Fahrenheit (0.055 degree Celsius) in
the past 30-50 years. This may not seem like much of a temperature
change, but it is significant.
The ocean is warming. Stop bullshitting. Global warming is a *fact*.
What causes it, and what to do about it, are subject to debate, but the
*fact* of the warming is not subject to debate.
emoneyjoe
wrote:
Well, foul mouthed liberal, what difference does temperature
make if the total thermal energy is not the object of the calculation?
There are a number of self controlling mechanisms in
atmospheric and planetary science, water evaporates more
when it is warmer than the air above it.
>The average temperature in shipping lanes is rising - not in dispute.
And that is somehow a worry?
Rather than spend a lot of money paying paranoid
educated people to write future horror stories why not
fund alternate energy projects in locations where they
will be efficient and be easily maintained long term.
There is a deplorable lack of new ideas and well
thought out uses of old ideas, I blame this on way too
much specialization and not enough cross-technology
education.
Wave and tidal energy may be one of the top three
or four best alternate energy sources, but as far as I
know, all attempts have used the upward stroke to
provide the power.
Using the upward stroke to lift weights, and then
letting gravity provide the power seems better, and
instead of direct conversion to power, use the energy
to pump water up into a holding lake and use water
turbines to produce energy 24 hours a day.
Steam Solar is not being supported or used as
much as it could be, in fact alternate energy is not
being promoted or appreciated as both a source
of energy and job creation as it should be, there
is just almost nothing going on but mouths running,
and no action.
That is not change.
emoneyjoe
emoneyjoe
wrote:
All that is useful for a lot of science, but it has little
meaning in calculations of total thermal energy of the
atmosphere, oceans and top few thousand meters
of the surface.
It is only total energy content that can point to any
long term changes/
>The ocean is warming. Stop bullshitting. Global warming is a *fact*.
>What causes it, and what to do about it, are subject to debate, but the
>*fact* of the warming is not subject to debate.
You said the shipping lanes are warming, is millions
of dollars and satellite technology needed to know that?
Global warming is bullshit, climate change warrants
study, but what is all the hysteria about, if there is no
way to do anything about it, plan for the consequences,
moaning won't help.
If the issue had not become so political oriented
it might be easier to discuss and make plans.
Too much of the world needs space heating,
and transportation uses too much fossil fuel in
liquid form.
It isn't my fault, in fact I have tried to promote
alternate energy and gave up, too many different
agendas, and not enough broad education to be
able to properly assess practical applications that
are economically viable.
emoneyjoe
George Plimpton
The surface of the planet is warning - not in dispute.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
is it totally inadequate, or merely largely?
there used t be a dataset of ne'er-urban stations
in the continental USA, for some reason "abandoned,"
some time ago ... even though it is just a sample.
emoneyjoe
wrote:
That is what the data shows, the reason is moving
all the weather stations to where it is warmer.
With only a limited number of pre-1980 weather
stations being used for data, and quite a few new
stations being used, of what use is that data?
Is there anybody too dumb to know that in
a data set less than 200 years old, it is very common
to set high records on some dates during the year,
is there anybody dumb enough to think that means
the planet is warming?
emoneyjoe
How did this topic push into this newsgroup?
George Plimpton
That's false. No earth scientist could make such a fundamental error.
It didn't happen - measurements are being taken where they have been
taken for centuries.
emoneyjoe
wrote:
"Science". where the data is modified according to number
and wattage of light bulbs seen by satellite;
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GISSTemperature/giss_temperature3.php
"Adjusting" data;
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2/monthly/menne-williams2009.pdf
Absurdities in "science".
http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/weather_stations/
More;
http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php?g2_itemId=5322
ICE
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/09/death-of-a-carbon-salesman-chicago-climate-exchange/
The list of weather stations in eastern europe that closed
when the USSR collapsed may be hard to find, it shows that
there is no science at all possible with changes in the list of
stations used for data.
emoneyjoe
emoneyjoe
<spamt...@AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
>See when all that "warming" began?
>
>http://www.umweltluege.de/images/nvst.jpg
>(Source: NASA)
Peter, are you still at it? :-)
What happened to the lists of station starting
and closing dates?
I was looking for the list showing how many
were in the colder eastern Europe locations that
closed when the USSR funding stopped, the
fact that region was colder than the locations
used now would seem very important.
emoneyjoe
emoneyjoe
<spamt...@AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
>The USHCN is the densiest on earth.
>Europe and USSR GHCN stations have been, and still are, thin on the ground.
>Removing 'misbehaving cooler' stations might have a greater effect in total on
>the European and Asian overall results.
>
>Maybe I should direct an enquiry to Anthony Watts at www.surfacestations.org
>to extend his work to the whole GHCN, not only USGHCN.
>Though USGHCN is the most modern equipped and maintained network, it could be
>a practical possibility that improper reassessment of EU and USSR data has
>hopefully not yet been occured to a greater extent.
Just continuing to use the pre-1990 years in the data set
results in a bias.
>Meanwhile I received monthly stationary data for my location beginning in 1960
>and, as a sample from global, it not only shows the same shape as global
>temperatures, but it also shows continuous cooling for the last 8 years on
>both, max and min temperatures, of about astonishing 4°C.
>
>As said, it is only a sample, but may also be representative as a 50 year
>record.
I suppose western Europe could be an isolated case,
but the weather here has been more stagnant in summer
which causes longer periods of warmth but no records,
and the last two winters were not record cold, just 10
to 20 degrees below normal for weeks at a time.
But since they moved the weather station to the
airport, the official temperature is 3 or 4 degrees
warmer than in the outlying areas.
It is moisture evaporating, and all the global warming
drones can think of is heat causing storms, even though
the physics is clearly cold air clashing with moisture is
what causes storms.
Thanks for posting that graph, it clearly shows the
last 20 years of data is biased by the closing of USSR
funded stations.
emoneyjoe
Louis Gentile
days when it is not dusted off, and ASOS has tight instrument packages
as well, and I doubt that air traffic control has the time to go out and
clean them when they have their hands full directing air traffic. I
believe this resulting one degree (F) difference should be taken into
account when compared with historical temperature records from the large
cool shaded instrument shelters of the past.
Also, i am interested in why our July heat here in the Northeast was
hyped, like whenever we expected a very hot 90 plus degree day, while
cold wave warnings no longer are in use duing the winter.
And, off the record, GFS has a massive hurricane moving up the eastern
seaboard on Day 13 with a large body of cool air coming in behind it.
Could be Invest#93 heading west into the Caribbean if it slows down, but
more likely that new system coming off Africa. Could always depend on
the GFS:)