You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ncqr...@googlegroups.com
I am looking around at various CQRS/ES frameworks that are fairly simple and lightweight. I really like the way that ncqrs does things - it is very similar to the approach that I was taking with a spike of my own. Google groups doesn't show the year on messages, so I'm not sure if this group is active or not. The commits on github seem infrequent. Is ncqrs moribund, or is it finished (as in complete)?
Thanks,
Erick
Pieter Joost van de Sande
unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 1:41:28 AM4/26/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ncqr...@googlegroups.com
We have multiple projects running in production that use ncqrs. Most features are pretty stable. We started with vnext development of ncqrs are few months ago. The goal is to consolidate. Dropping features that aren't stable and make the components more IoC friendly.
ShuriK
unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 4:20:02 AM4/26/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ncqr...@googlegroups.com
Look at
Jonathan Oliver's eventstore and commondomain. As for me, they are more lightweight than ncqrs.
Jon Ceanfaglione
unread,
Apr 26, 2012, 5:56:18 AM4/26/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message