Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

C.R.A. - Some Sympathy for Tax Avoiders :CRA SOTW

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Alan Baggett

unread,
Oct 3, 2008, 1:30:35 PM10/3/08
to
CRA: Some Sympathy for Tax Avoiders :CRA SOTW

The recent tax tale - 16 Sept 2008 “Canadians now Feel some Tax
Evasion is Justifiable”
http://groups.google.com/group/ott.general/browse_thread/thread/a5a44e2da25869fc/0d61d5d6d042fbc5?lnk=st&q=#0d61d5d6d042fbc5
illustrates why some Canucks justify Tax Evasion. This week’s Tax Tale
discusses how the CRA wants to deter tax avoiders.

Appeal to potential tax evaders' social conscience, revenue agency
told
Make it clear taxes pay for health care, education, social services,
report says

Eric Beauchesne , Canwest News Service
Published: Friday, September 19, 2008
OTTAWA - Those most likely to cheat on their taxes have sympathy for
ordinary people who do it.

That's one of the findings of the Canada Revenue Agency when it peeked
into the thinking of those it felt were potential tax cheats to find
the best way to deter them.

It's a mindset that it feels it needs to change.

Tax avoidance was generally seen as 'wrong' or 'illegal,' and yet
there was a considerable degree of sympathy for ordinary people who
avoid paying their taxes," said a report on the findings of research
this year aimed at helping the federal tax department prepare a tax
compliance advertising campaign.

"Indeed, there seemed to emerge a double standard, whereby wealthy and
powerful tax avoiders are seen as using their position to navigate and
even to manipulate the system, while lower-income workers who conceal
some of their earnings are seen to be doing what they need 'to get
by'," it said.

"Participants were well aware of methods of avoiding taxes and most
felt that the practice of avoiding taxes is very widespread," noted
the report, which based on findings from 16 focus groups conducted
nationwide by pollster Ipsos-Reid with Canadians who had been
"screened to exhibit attitudes of being less likely than the average
to fully comply with tax laws."

Tax avoidance was also seen as reasonably safe because most believed
that people "generally get away with it," it said. "Severe penalties
for avoiding taxes were seen as exceptional, and therefore the
consequences of being caught were considered to be a mere annoyance
rather than an effective deterrent."

In justifying tax evasion, most argued that the government wastes
taxpayers' money, and that ordinary individuals do not get enough for
what they are expected to pay in taxes, it said. Adding to that view
was a perceived weaknesses in the health-care system and in government
assistance for those who need it.

Also, that the government runs annual surpluses was perceived as
evidence that Canadians are overtaxed.

"Nevertheless, many participants recognized these arguments as
rationalizations for avoiding taxes and admitted that financial need
or simple greed were the bottom-line reasons why people avoid paying
their taxes," it also noted.

Two key conclusions from the research were that "messages about what
taxes pay for are appealing, but guilt is not seen as an effective
motivator" and that "messages about the consequences of avoiding taxes
are seen as distasteful, but compelling."

As a result, the report recommends that a hybrid approach that
includes both messages.

"It is also important to dispel the notion that tax avoidance is
something that only wealthy people get caught for and underline the
fact that 'ordinary' people are also caught," it said. "The fine line
in this messaging is to avoid raising the reaction that 'ordinary' tax
cheats are sympathetic figures unjustly persecuted by the government."

In terms of what governments spend the money on, the report noted that
participants were split about whether the campaign should be positive
and appeal to a sense of social responsibility or whether it should
emphasize the negative consequences, such as the impact of a lack of
funds on the health care system.

Presented with five messages, and asked to rank them in terms of their
potential effectiveness, the top was that "It is wrong to avoid or
underpay taxes since taxes pay for key government services such as
health care, education and social services."

That was followed in order by:

- Evading or underpaying taxes is extremely risky and puts those who
do it at risk of heavy fines and possibly even time in jail.

- People who pay for services 'under-the-table' run huge risks that
range from damage to their home and property to liability for injuries
to those performing the work.

- Avoiding or underpaying taxes is unfair because it means that those
who pay all their taxes are paying more than those who don't.

- Businesses that avoid or underpay taxes not only cheat the public,
they also have an unfair competitive advantage over businesses that
don't cheat.

"Participants liked the idea of advertising that makes a case for why
taxes should be paid by explaining how tax dollars are spent," it
said.

"While many participants did say that tax avoiders could be shamed
into paying all that they owe if they knew that taxes were essential
to paying for public services, others convincingly questioned whether
those who avoid taxes for personal gain could be moved by an appeal to
altruism or whether they would believe or agree with the message that
taxes pay for important services in view of the fact that so many see
government as wasteful."

© Canwest News Service 2008


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!
Pop the link below into your browser to view the entire CRA SOTW
Library!
http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Baggett – Tax Collector’s Bible

0 new messages