The Civilization of Islam

0 views
Skip to first unread message

yoyosmartguy

unread,
Oct 3, 2007, 8:52:23 AM10/3/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
Was the civilization of Islam strongn in some areas and weak in
others? If yes then in which areas was it weak in?

mary

unread,
Oct 7, 2007, 7:00:35 AM10/7/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
no my opinion says that it wasnot weak at all yet it was not throughly
strong in some

farheen.fmcr

unread,
Oct 11, 2007, 11:36:42 AM10/11/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008

i dont think weak would be the correct word to describe the
civilization,it was progressing as each day had passed, in
mathematics,astronomy,mechanical etc they were improving and were
making more discoveries.they were good traders and good fighters with
keen thinkin skills.it was slowly advancing hence.
> > others? If yes then in which areas was it weak in?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yahya Shakeel

unread,
Oct 17, 2007, 4:08:18 AM10/17/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
What i mean is that was it weak in the areas as siege, armed battle or crops

farheen zaidi

unread,
Oct 17, 2007, 8:13:32 AM10/17/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
they were good fighters and good farmers as well.They were slowly progressing as i had said earlier,:p they weren't weak in anything.They were quite talented,some of them might be slow in battle or maybe even in the knowledge category but they had adapted well from the areas they had captured and settled  in.they were pretty good in farming as well.becuz of them we are who we are.  

Ryyan

unread,
Oct 19, 2007, 7:03:33 AM10/19/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
plz answer this one from civilization of Islam
'why did the arab scholars translated other languages into arabic
language?

On Oct 17, 5:13 pm, "farheen zaidi" <farheen.fmcr.an...@gmail.com>
wrote:


> they were good fighters and good farmers as well.They were
> slowly progressing as i had said earlier,:p they weren't weak in
> anything.They were quite talented,some of them might be slow in battle or
> maybe even in the knowledge category but they had adapted well from the
> areas they had captured and settled in.they were pretty good in farming as
> well.becuz of them we are who we are.
>

> On 10/17/07, Yahya Shakeel <pokemonboylo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > What i mean is that was it weak in the areas as siege, armed battle or
> > crops
>

> > On 10/11/07, farheen.fmcr <Farheen.fmcr.an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > i dont think weak would be the correct word to describe the
> > > civilization,it was progressing as each day had passed, in
> > > mathematics,astronomy,mechanical etc they were improving and were
> > > making more discoveries.they were good traders and good fighters with
> > > keen thinkin skills.it was slowly advancing hence.
> > > On Oct 7, 4:00 pm, mary <shaikhmahn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > no my opinion says that it wasnot weak at all yet it was not throughly
> > > > strong in some
>
> > > > On Oct 3, 5:52 pm, yoyosmartguy <pokemonboylo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Was the civilization of Islam strongn in some areas and weak in
> > > > > others? If yes then in which areas was it weak in?- Hide quoted text
> > > -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>

> --
> *farheen*- Hide quoted text -

farheen zaidi

unread,
Oct 20, 2007, 4:31:16 AM10/20/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
They did that so that the arabs could also study and read transcripts and other manuscripts and understand+work on them which were written by people and scholars all around the world.they weren't only translated in arabic they were translated into million other languages and because of that other people could discover and invent stuff as well.every philosophers ideas were shared by billion others and because of that process we are where we are right now. :-)!
--
                *farheen*

Ryyan

unread,
Oct 21, 2007, 7:29:02 AM10/21/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
wow!! amazing answer

On Oct 20, 1:31 pm, "farheen zaidi" <farheen.fmcr.an...@gmail.com>
wrote:


> They did that so that the arabs could also study and read transcripts and
> other manuscripts and understand+work on them which were written by people
> and scholars all around the world.they weren't only translated in arabic
> they were translated into million other languages and because of that other
> people could discover and invent stuff as well.every philosophers ideas were
> shared by billion others and because of that process we are where we are
> right now. :-)!
>

Nimzoid

unread,
Oct 22, 2007, 2:44:37 PM10/22/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008

Rack your brains on this one:
When did the whole concept of different sects (u know, sunni-shia
sects) in the Islamic Civilization form? Why? Where? How? Anything you
know about the origins of these groups.

farheen zaidi

unread,
Oct 25, 2007, 8:48:22 AM10/25/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
First of all thanks ryyan, second ,nimzoid i think that is a very good question.i believe that the whole sunni, shia concept had started after the death of our holy prophet[PBUH] .Some of the caliphs of arabia particularly in mukkah had bitterly opposed the fact that some of the people had put up an argument stating that huzrat ali[ A.S]should be the next caliph after our prophet because he had specially said that after me ali will lead the muslims, some of his followers were angry and bitter so they turned against huzrat ali and didn't care about his family and descendants.after the hatred and bitterness some of them burried the hatchet and followed what they believed in.That is why some of them separated into sunnis and shias and lived their lives.Some of them can't leave the past behind and bitterly oppose each other till this day"proof" the bomb blasts in imam barghas etc.  
--
                *farheen*

Ryyan shahid

unread,
Oct 25, 2007, 11:18:53 AM10/25/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
nimzoid that was a good question and farheen your answer seems to be right as usual
now answer mine, think first and then answer
when prophet(PBUH) went to SIDRAT-UL-MUBTEHA,what did he saw and what gift did he brought for muslims???   

 

Ryyan shahid

unread,
Oct 25, 2007, 11:19:49 AM10/25/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
****MUNTEHA
(spelling mistake)

 

farheen zaidi

unread,
Nov 2, 2007, 7:30:53 AM11/2/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
Frankly ryyan you have me stumpt on this one i don't even know what sidrat ul munteha is i think it is a very good question though, so do tell the answer.

Nimzoid

unread,
Nov 3, 2007, 5:58:00 AM11/3/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
Yeah, im not familiar with sidrat-ul-munteha either. Could you tell us
what it is?? =) And thanks to both of u for commenting on my question

Speaking of whcih: What do u mean by: some of his followers were angry


and bitter so they turned against
huzrat ali and didn't care about his family and descendants.

Did they want HAzrat Ali to be the caplih and were upset he didnt
become the first one?
>From where i picked this thing up: The concept started during Hazrat
USman's ca\liphate, As we all know during his time, the muslim state
was extemely powerful speading till Kabul. A lot of peoples had
accepted islam, but there were tons who had not embarced the true
meaning of islam...they're the hypcrites. One such hyprocrite by the
anme of Abdullah bin Safa was a jew who turned into msulim, but was
actrually plottign the decline of islam.By spreading the idea of
Hazrat Ali being the true caplih...he was expleeed from medinah ..to
kufa...to damascus and eventually egypt cuz HAzrat usamn was too kind-
hearted to simply execute him for his ideas. Sadly, this was the worst
mistake he made, becuase Abdullah binm safa had now gained a lot of
supporters and the divded between the muslims had begun.
So, hope this clears up eveything.

On Nov 2, 4:30 pm, "farheen zaidi" <farheen.fmcr.an...@gmail.com>
wrote:


> Frankly ryyan you have me stumpt on this one i don't even know what sidrat
> ul munteha is i think it is a very good question though, so do tell the
> answer.
>

> On 10/25/07, Ryyan shahid <signalfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ****MUNTEHA
> > (spelling mistake)
>

> > On 10/25/07, Ryyan shahid <signalfi...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> > > nimzoid that was a good question and farheen your answer seems to be
> > > right as usual
> > > now answer mine, think first and then answer
> > > when prophet(PBUH) went to SIDRAT-UL-MUBTEHA,what did he saw and what
> > > gift did he brought for muslims???
>

> > > On 10/25/07, farheen zaidi <farheen.fmcr.an...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> > > > First of all thanks ryyan, second ,nimzoid i think that is a very good
> > > > question.i believe that the whole sunni, shia concept had started
> > > > after the death of our holy prophet[PBUH] .Some of the caliphs of arabia
> > > > particularly in mukkah had bitterly opposed the fact that some of the people
> > > > had put up an argument stating that huzrat ali[ A.S]should be the next
> > > > caliph after our prophet because he had specially said that after me ali
> > > > will lead the muslims, some of his followers were angry and bitter so they
> > > > turned against huzrat ali and didn't care about his family and
> > > > descendants.after the hatred and bitterness some of them burried the
> > > > hatchet and followed what they believed in.That is why some of them
> > > > separated into sunnis and shias and lived their lives.Some of them
> > > > can't leave the past behind and bitterly oppose each other till this
> > > > day"proof" the bomb blasts in imam barghas etc.
>

> > > > On 10/22/07, Nimzoid <nimz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Rack your brains on this one:
> > > > > When did the whole concept of different sects (u know, sunni-shia
> > > > > sects) in the Islamic Civilization form? Why? Where? How? Anything
> > > > > you
> > > > > know about the origins of these groups.
>
> > > > --
> > > > *farheen*
>

Ryyan shahid

unread,
Nov 6, 2007, 1:58:31 PM11/6/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
thankyou guys
the ans to this is that the prophet hazrat muhammed (PBUH) went to sidrat-ul-munteha with hazrat jibraeel,he saw the seven skies and he also saw the angels who were worshipping allah.the gift which he brought for muslims was the five prayers instead of fifty prayers.

 

farheen zaidi

unread,
Nov 7, 2007, 6:28:01 AM11/7/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
awww that is sweet :-)

****MUNTEHA
(spelling mistake)

 
--
                *farheen*

warisha

unread,
Nov 7, 2007, 6:52:35 AM11/7/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008

i guess maybe to understand better

Ryyan shahid

unread,
Nov 7, 2007, 11:49:04 AM11/7/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
what do you need to understand

Nimzoid

unread,
Nov 8, 2007, 11:21:14 AM11/8/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
Oh yes, i remember now. On the occasion of Maihraj, when the Prophet
ascended. Yeah that was a very cool question=)

On Nov 7, 9:49 pm, "Ryyan shahid" <signalfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> what do you need to understand
>

> On 11/7/07, warisha <waris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > i guess maybe to understand better- Hide quoted text -

Ryyan shahid

unread,
Nov 9, 2007, 8:40:21 AM11/9/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
thanks

Nimzoid

unread,
Nov 19, 2007, 5:47:17 AM11/19/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008


The prohpet saw a whole lotta other things as well... He saw heaven
and hell and the previous prophets too. So i guess by witnessing the
pleasures of heaven and the fire of hell by his own eyes....this
brought a whole new perception to his preachings. Perhaps thats what
warisha meant by understanding better.

Shayan Shaoib

unread,
Nov 20, 2007, 2:06:42 AM11/20/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
wat r u talking about

Nimzoid

unread,
Nov 24, 2007, 2:00:08 AM11/24/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
Erm...ohkay. Lets make it more clear.
When the Prophet ascended the seven heavens and all. He saw a lot of
things during the acension. On his way, he saw the prohphets preceding
him (so that helps him understand the lineage of the prophets).
According to other traditions, he was shown Hell and Heaven and what
would happen to those who go there. in other words, he saw with his
own eyes these acts. This brought the different pereption to
preachings. He could now preach people what exactly the fires of hell
were, etc etc.
> > warisha meant by understanding better.- Hide quoted text -

Ryyan shahid

unread,
Nov 26, 2007, 3:05:26 AM11/26/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
you areright

zaid alvi

unread,
Nov 27, 2007, 6:15:24 AM11/27/07
to Naus...@googlegroups.com
ryyan he answered u ..but that was a very good question

mary

unread,
Dec 9, 2007, 11:16:09 AM12/9/07
to Class VII Academic Session 2007-2008
they ttttranslated it because a lot of knew arabic while others didnt
and also because arabs wanted to learn more and advance themselves
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages