Very informative...please take time to read.
What The End of Swiss Banking Secrecy Means For
India
By Chitra Subramaniam
How does Switzerland, a country of 8 million people develop and
lead ten global brands? The same way it manages one third of the world’s
assets under management (AUM). Time will tell whether the end of
banking secrecy this week will lead to a realigning of assets in other
tax-havens. Since we broke the story in India yesterday we have been
inundated with calls and messages asking what this means for Indians.
The
good news for Indian tax-evaders and money-launderers is that India is
not a part of the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Development and
Cooperation (OECD) that groups 47 countries with varying economic and
political might from around the world. The bad news is that Indian
Finance Minister P. Chidambaram’s could be hoist on his own bluff.
In
a recent statement to reporters he said if the Swiss government does
not cooperate with India in its tireless
and ceaseless pursuit of illegal Indian money in Switzerland, he would
shame Bern in front of the G-20. Fact of the matter is many powerful
countries in the G-20 – an economic grouping of countries that
technically challenges the G-8 - are also members of the OECD.
What
this latest development can mean for India, if the Indian government
wants, is the following. When an Indian opens a bank account in the
Alpine country, s/he will be required to sign a document which will
state that information will be shared between Bern and New Delhi. This
will include normal reporting information like bank balance, dividends
and interest and sales proceeds used to calculate capital tax gains.
This is already the practice between OECD countries and Switzerland and
Singapore have now joined the group.
Estimates
of how much money is illegally held by Indians in Swiss banks ranges
from US$1.42 billion to US$2.18 billion with the CBI and the finance
ministry constantly contradicting each other of either exaggerating or
under-quoting. Money goes where money feels safe so while tax-evaders
and money-launderers are not waiting to be caught, there will always be a
paper and/or electronic trail.
The
other frequently asked question in India is– and The News Minute
received a fair share of these in the last 24 hours – how far back will
the information go. The short answer is also the straight one –
everything depends on New Delhi. As things stand now, if India or any
other country asks for information relating to illegal accounts and tax
evasion, the Swiss
will
answer. The Swiss banks can no longer have
illegal accounts held by foreigners.
Simply
stated, it is not for want of laws that New Delhi has failed. It is
want of will – now and for decades. The national Indian pastime of
passing the buck is the country’s best kept secret and there many jokes
in Switzerland’s banking, financial and political circles about how
Indian politicians and businessmen open their eyes wide shut when it
comes to l’argent sale or black money.
Swiss
banking secrecy and the fabled numbered and secret accounts date back
to 1934 when Jews fleeing Nazi Germany deposited their money and
documents to be kept safe in the deep vaults of a country most believed
was neutral. Switzerland’s neutrality is an armed neutrality – not just
militarily
but also armed strategically
with information, money and precision. Just like invading tanks cannot
overrun the country and its alpine topography, Swiss banking secrecy and
its methods have developed and strengthened over several decades as all
countries deposited their wealth in a country whose political stability
served all interests.
All
that has changed dramatically over the past decade as a result of
national but more importantly, international pressure from countries
seeking to retrieve their money and assets deposited in Swiss banks by
dictators and corrupt politicians, drugs and arms dealers. Push came to
shove in 2009 when the United Bank of Switzerland (UBS) paid a fine of
US$780 million to the US government, entering into a deferred
prosecution agreement on charges of conspiring to defraud the American
government by impeding their tax authority, the
Internal Revenue
Service (IRS). Read about the UBS story here- UBS tax evasion controversy
For
the record, I add here that during the Bofors investigations, unknown
to me, a Ms. Donovan from London was transferring money into my UBS
account in Switzerland. I returned the money as soon as it showed up in
my monthly statement. UBS did not disclose who Ms. Donovan was. Suffice
for the moment to say that along with the UBS, another
Swiss banking
giant Crédit Suisse was also involved in the Bofors
payoffs. I also received a legal notice from a Delhi-based public
relations consultant-turned image guru. I will write about that in
another post.
Fearing a similar trans-Atlantic probe, top private banks changed the
company structures and holdings to limit liability. The latest Swiss
bank to be investigated is Crédit Suisse – slated to plead guilty in a
US court shortly – and banking sources say the bank could be fined as
much as US$1.4 billion for helping American citizens evade taxes by
providing false and fraudulent information.
Read- Tunisia, Peru, Nigeria and now America to retrieve illegal money in Swiss banks: India?
Pressure
on Switzerland and Swiss banks has also been mounting from Germany and
France to share information about tax-evaders and money-launderers. Tax
is one of the primary reasons people park their money in Switzerland.
“It is clearly
the end of banking secrecy abused for tax purposes,” OECD said in a
statement. What the United Kingdom (UK), also a member of the OECD,
proposes to do
with tax evasion and money
laundering via British Virgin islands (BVi) and the Caymen Islands is
an issue that will be keenly watched by all including Swiss bankers