Press Release: West Bengal Assembly Elections 2026 - Phase II: Analysis of Criminal Background, Financial, Education, Gender and other Details of Candidates

1 view

Skip to first unread message

ADR India

unread,

Apr 20, 2026, 6:32:12 AM (yesterday) Apr 20

to national...@googlegroups.com, national-el...@googlegroups.com

Press Release

Date: April 20, 2026

Dear Friends,

The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and West Bengal Election Watch have analysed the self-sworn affidavits of 1445 out of 1448 candidates, who are contesting in the West Bengal Assembly Elections Phase II.

The full reports in English, Hindi and Bengali can be accessed here: https://adrindia.org/content/Analysis-of-Criminal-Financial-and-other-Details-of-Candidates-West-Bengal-Assembly-Elections-2026-Phase-II

Summary and Highlights

Criminal Background

Candidates with Criminal Cases: Out of 1445 candidates analyzed, 338 (23%) candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.

Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 295(20%) have declared serious criminal cases against themselves.

Candidates with cases related to Murder: 16 candidates have declared cases of to murder (IPC Section-302).

Candidates with cases related to Attempt to Murder: 80 candidates have declared cases of attempt to murder (IPC Section-307) and (BNS Section-109).

Candidates with cases related to Crimes against Women: 94 candidates have declared cases related to crimes against women. Out of 94 candidates, 2 candidates have declared cases related to rape (IPC Section-376) and person committing rape repeatedly on the same woman (IPC Section- 376(2)(n)).

Party wise Candidates with Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,102(72%) out of 141 candidates analysed from BJP, 49(35%) out of 142 candidates analysed from AITC, 51 (51%) out of 100 candidates analysed from CPI(M) and 37 (26%) out of 142 candidates analysed from INC have declared criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.

Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Candidates with Criminal Cases

Party wise Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,92(65%) out of 141 candidates analysed from BJP, 42(30%) out of 142 candidates analysed from AITC, 42 (42%) out of 100 candidates analysed from CPI(M) and 30 (21%) out of 142 candidates analysed from INC have declared serious criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.

Red Alert Constituencies*: 63(44%) out of 142 constituencies are red alert constituencies. Red alert constituencies are those where 3 or more contesting candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.

The directions of the Supreme Court have had no effect on the political parties in selection of candidates in the West Bengal Assembly Elections 2026 Phase 2 as they have again followed their old practice of giving tickets to around 23% candidates with criminal cases. All major parties contesting in West Bengal Assembly Elections 2026 Phase 2 have given tickets from 26% to 72 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. The Supreme Court in its directions dated 13th February, 2020 had specifically instructed political parties to give reasons for such selection and why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. As per these mandatory guidelines, the reasons for such selection has to be with reference to qualifications, achievements and merit of the candidate concerned. During the recent State Assembly elections held in 2025, it was observed that political parties gave unfounded and baseless reasons like popularity of the person, does good social work, cases are politically motivated etc. These are not sound and cogent reasons for fielding candidates with tainted backgrounds. This data clearly shows that political parties have no interest in reforming the electoral system and our democracy will continue to suffer at the hands of lawbreakers who become lawmakers.

Financial Background

Figure: Share of Wealth among the Contesting Candidates

Share of wealth among candidates: The share of wealth amongst the candidates contesting in the West Bengal assembly elections 2026 phase II is as follows:

Value of assets (Rs.)	Number of candidates	Percentage of Candidates
Rs. 10 crores and above	31	2%
Rs. 5 crores to Rs. 10 crores	38	3%
Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 5 crores	252	17%
Rs. 20 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore	432	30%
less than Rs. 20 lakhs	692	48%

Table: Share of wealth amongst contesting candidates

Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 1445 candidates, 321 (22%) are crorepatis.

Party wise Crorepati Candidates: The role of money power in our elections is evident from the fact that all major political parties give tickets to wealthy candidates. Among the major parties 103(73%) out of 142 candidates analysed from AITC, 73(52%) out of 141 candidates analysed from BJP, 36(25%) out of 142 candidates analysed from INC and 33(33%) out of 100 candidates analysed from CPI(M) have declared assets valued more than Rs 1 crore.

Party Wise Percentage of Crorepati Candidates

Average assets: The average of assets per candidate contesting in the West Bengal Assembly Elections 2026 Phase II is Rs 1.21 Crore.

Party wise average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per candidate for 142 AITC candidates analysed is Rs. 5.05 Crores, 141 BJP candidates analysed is Rs 3.28 Crore, 100 CPI(M) candidates have average assets of Rs 1.22 Crores and 142 INC candidates have average assets worth Rs. 1.04 Crore.

Highest assets candidates: The details of top 3 candidates with highest declared assets, contesting in the West Bengal Assembly Elections Phase II are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Movable Assets (Rs)	Immovable Assets (Rs)	Total Assets (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Palash Rana	South 24 Parganas	Raidighi	BJP	21,57,56,390	82,90,00,000	1,04,47,56,390 104 Crore+	Y
2	Samir Chakraborty	Hooghly	Pandua	AITC	46,73,64,000	29,50,00,000	76,23,64,000 76 Crore+	Y
3	Ahmed Javed Khan	South 24 Parganas	Kasba	AITC	15,00,23,826	24,53,30,000	39,53,53,826 39 Crore+	Y

Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets

Zero assets candidates: There are 4 candidates who have declared zero assets. The details of these candidates are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Movable Assets (Rs)	Immovable Assets (Rs)	Total Assets (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Mousumi Ghosh	South 24 Parganas	Behala Paschim	IND	0	0	0	Y
2	Asif Hussain	Howrah	Howrah Madhya	Aam Janata Unnayan party	0	0	0	Y
3	Sahajadi Parvin	Howrah	Uluberia Purba	Welfare Party Of India	0	0	0	Y
4	Sk Habib	Howrah	Uluberia Dakshin	Aam Janata Unnayan party	0	0	0	Y

Table: Candidates with declared zero assets

Lowest assets candidates: The details of three candidates with lowest assets (excluding zero assets candidates) are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Movable Assets (Rs)	Immovable Assets (Rs)	Total Assets (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Dilip Sanfui	South 24 Parganas	Canning Paschim (SC)	IND	1,000	0	1,000 1 Thou+	Y
2	Sekh Mohinuddin	Howrah	Panchla	Amra Bangalee	1,000	0	1,000 1 Thou+	Y
3	Kaushik Mondal	North 24 Parganas	Basirhat Uttar	IND	1,500	0	1,500 1 Thou+	Y

Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets

Candidates with highest liabilities: 481(33%) candidates have declared liabilities in their affidavits. The details of top three candidates with highest liabilities are given below:

S.No.	Name	District	Constituency	Party Name	Total Assets (Rs)	Liabilities (Rs)	Disputed liabilities (Rs)	PAN Given
1	Ahmed Javed Khan	South 24 Parganas	Kasba	AITC	39,53,53,826 39 Crore+	43,72,40,035 43 Crore+	0	Y
2	Somenath Shyam Ichini	North 24 Parganas	Jagatdal	AITC	34,72,40,611 34 Crore+	40,37,42,830 40 Crore+	0	Y
3	Dipankar Jana	South 24 Parganas	Kakdwip	BJP	22,47,43,165 22 Crore+	10,27,44,080 10 Crore+	61,27,604 61 Lacs+	Y

Table: Top three candidates with highest liabilities

Candidates with highest income as declared in the ITR*: The details of top 3 candidates with highest income declared in ITR are given below:

S.No.	Name	Party Name	Constituency	District	Total Assets (Rs)	Self Source of Income	Spouse's Source of Income	The financial year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate	Total income shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs)	Self income shown by candidate in ITR (Rs)
1	Sharadwat Mukherjee	BJP	Bidhannagar	North 24 Parganas	15,72,26,453 15 Crore+	Medical Practice	Medical Practice and Salary	2024-2025	4,44,80,240 4 Crore+	4,14,83,140 4 Crore+
2	Samir Chakraborty	AITC	Pandua	Hooghly	76,23,64,000 76 Crore+	Business	Business	2024-2025	4,25,84,200 4 Crore+	3,88,30,030 3 Crore+
3	Firhad Hakim	AITC	Kolkata Port	Kolkata South	22,57,53,159 22 Crore+	Business Bank Interest, Salary from Govt of W.B & Other	Business Bank Interest and Other	2024-2025	3,82,57,201 3 Crore+	1,71,62,824 1 Crore+

Table: Top 3 candidates with highest income as declared in ITR

Other Background Details

Education details of candidates: 646(45%) candidates have declared their educational qualifications to be between 5^th and 12^thstandard while 721(50%) candidates have declared having an educational qualification of graduate or above. 23 candidates are Diploma holders. 39 candidates have declared themselves to be just literate and 16 candidates are Illiterates.

Age details of candidates: 404(28%) candidates have declared their age to be between 25 to 40 years while 786 (54%) candidates have declared their age to be between 41 to 60 years. There are 253(18%) candidates who have declared their age to be between 61 to 80 years. There are 2 candidates who have declared their age to be above 80 years.

Gender details of candidates: 218(15%) female candidates are contesting in the West Bengal assembly election 2026 Phase II.

Recommendations of ADR:

To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and citizens. The Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required laws.
Permanent disqualification of candidates convicted for heinous crimes like murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity, kidnapping etc.
Disqualification of persons from contesting elections to the public offices against whom charges have been framed for having committed serious criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of at least 5 years, and the case is filed at least 6 months prior to the election in question.
Cancellation of tax exemptions given to the political parties who field such tainted candidates.
Bringing political parties under the Right to Information Act.
De-register and de-recognise any political party if it knowingly puts up a candidate with a tainted background.
Political parties should annually file the information on criminal antecedents of their Office Bearers and make such records available to the public, including NIL records.
Disqualification of candidates furnishing false information in the election affidavit (Form 26).
Ensure trial of cases in which the politicians are accused to be concluded in a time bound manner.
Implementation of SC judgment dated 23^rd September, 2013 (i.e provision of NOTA buttons on the EVMs) in its letter and spirit by ensuring a) if NOTA gets more votes than any of the candidates, none of the candidates should be declared elected, and a fresh election should be held; b) in the fresh election, none of the candidates in the earlier election, in which NOTA got the highest number of votes, should be allowed to contest.
Implementation of the 25^th September, 2018 and 13^th February, 2020 SC orders on 'publication of criminal cases against candidates selected by political parties along with reasons for such selection' in its letter and spirit by directing the Election Commission of India a) to list out names of such tainted candidates selected by the political parties along with such reasons for such selection C8 including diligent publication of reasons in newspapers, T.V channels, party website etc, b) strict and constant reminders by ROs to the defaulters, c) list needs to be religiously prepared and submitted to the Supreme Court after every election, d) uploading of this list on ECI’s website for public inspection, e) a suitably heavy financial penalty levied on political parties for making insufficient disclosures, invalid and common reasons, selection of candidates based on winnability and f) Officer in-charge of a political party pertaining to submission of a compliance report should also be held accountable for such a breach.
The Election Commission of India and all State Election Commissions should make it mandatory in all elections; Parliamentary, Assembly and Local Body elections to carry display boards outside each and every polling booth showing a summarised version of candidates’ affidavits. The polling booths should essentially display details of candidate’s criminal records, assets and liabilities and education qualification.
The Election Commission of India under its ‘Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation’ (SVEEP) as well as through other national campaigns on voter awareness held before every election should inform and aware the voters that (i) taking and giving cash or gifts/freebies for votes is a criminal offense, (ii) such instances should be brought to the notice of the ECI through its web application, (iii) inform voters that information on criminal records of candidates is available on the ECI website, outside polling booths and other sources that the ECI may use.
Political parties in India should be required to announce/publish the list of candidates contesting elections at least 3 months prior to elections.
Role of money and muscle power is evident from the fact that all major political parties in West Bengal Assembly Elections 2026 Phase II have fielded 25% to 73% candidates who are crorepatis and 26% to 72 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. This close and alarming nexus between money power and muscle power has got so ingrained in our electoral system that the citizens are left hostage to the current situation. Money and muscle power hurt the principles of 'free and fair elections', 'participatory democracy' and 'level playing field'. The present circumstances therefore demand an extensive deliberation by the voters so that sanctity of elections is not ridiculed by tenacious entry of tainted candidates and candidates with abnormal multiplication of assets.