Case Title: Association for Democratic Reforms versus Union of India & Ors. | Writ Petition (C) No. 880 of 2017
Date: 15th February 2024
Dear Friends,
A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Justices Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, and Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra in a petition filed by Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has given a landmark judgment holding the anonymous, unregulated and unlimited funding through electoral bonds and companies as unconstitutional. The court relied on the fact that such a system of political funding which is completely anonymous, unchecked and unlimited goes against the basic principles of citizen’s Right to know under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and free and fair election and therefore the amendments brought through the Finance Act,2017 and passed as Money bill to Section 29C of RP Act,1951, Sections 181 & 183(3) of the Companies Act,2013, Section 13A(b) of the Income Tax Act,1961 were struck down as being violative of the Constitution. The court observed the principle that the citizens have a duty to hold the government of the day accountable for their actions and inactions, and they can effectively fulfil this duty only if the government is open and not clothed in secrecy.
ADR had filed the petition in the Supreme Court on 4th September,2017. Since then, six applications were filed for stay on the purchase of bonds and for early adjudication of the case i.e on 5th March, 2019, 29th November 2019, 26th October, 2020, 9th March, 2021, 15th November, 2022 and 1st December, 2022. Today’s verdict comes after nearly a wait of more than six years when the Supreme Court of India had heard the petition challenging the amendments brought by the Finance Act, 2017 for three consecutive days i.e 31st October, 1st & 2nd November, 2023.
The judgment relied on two key issues namely:
I. Whether the non-disclosure of information on voluntary contributions to political parties according to the electoral bond scheme and the amendments to Section 29C of Representation of the People Act, Section 183(3) of the Companies Act, Section 13A(b) of the Income Tax Act are violative of the Right to Information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution;
II. Whether unlimited corporate funding to political parties as envisaged by the amendment to Section 182(1) of the Companies Act violates the principles of free and fair elections.
The Apex Court also asserted that there are already other means other than electoral bonds to achieve the purpose of curbing black money if that was the primary objective of the scheme as per the Union of India’s stand. In its judgment, the court expressed apprehensions such as the scheme's selective anonymity, institutionalised kickbacks for political parties, unequal access to donor information, with the ruling party potentially possessing insight into contributors' identities while opposition parties lack such access. The Apex court while holding information as the key in a participatory democracy for the voters to make an informed choice also emphasized on the concept of open governance and observed;
"100...At a primary level, political contributions give a seat at the table to contributors, i.e., it enhances access to legislators. This access also translates to influence over policy making. There is also a legitimate possibility that financial contributions to a political party would lead to quid pro quo arrangement because of the close nexus between money and politics. The electoral bond scheme and the impugned provisions to the extent that they infringe upon the right to information of the voter by anonymising contributions through electoral bonds are violative of Article 19(1)(a)..."
Following directions were given by the court in today’s verdict:
I. The issuing bank shall herewith stop the issuance of Electoral Bonds;
II. SBI shall submit details of the Electoral Bonds purchased since the interim order of this Court dated 12 April 2019 till date to the ECI. The details shall include the date of purchase of each Electoral Bond, the name of the purchaser of the bond and the denomination of the Electoral Bond purchased;
III. SBI shall submit the details of political parties which have received contributions through Electoral Bonds since the interim order of this Court dated 12 April 2019 till date to the ECI. SBI must disclose details of each Electoral Bond encashed by political parties which shall include the date of encashment and the denomination of the Electoral Bond;
IV. SBI shall submit the above information to the ECI within three weeks from the date of this judgment, that is, by 6 March 2024;
V. The ECI shall publish the information shared by the SBI on its official website within one week of the receipt of the information, that is, by 13 March 2024; and
VI. Electoral Bonds which are within the validity period of fifteen days but that which have not been encashed by the political party yet shall be returned by the political party or the purchaser depending on who is in possession of the bond to the issuing bank. The issuing bank, upon return of the valid bond, shall refund the amount to the purchaser’s account
Contact Details
Association for Democratic Reforms
Media and Journalist Helpline
Email: a...@adrindia.org | Prof TrilochanSastry IIM Bangalore Chairman, Founder Member & Trustee Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch | Prof JagdeepChhokar IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.) Founder Member & Trustee Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch | Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd) Head Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch 011 4165 4200, a...@adrIndia.org, |