- Candidates with
Criminal Cases: Out of 184 candidates analyzed, 7(4%) candidates have declared criminal cases against
themselves. In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, out of 193 candidates
analysed, 3(2%) had declared criminal cases against themselves.
- Candidates with
Serious Criminal Cases: 4(2%) have
declared serious criminal cases against themselves. In 2018 Nagaland
Assembly Elections, 3(2%) candidates had declared serious criminal cases against themselves.
Figure:
Comparative analysis of Candidates with declared Criminal Cases: 2018 vs 2023
- Party wise
Candidates with Criminal Cases: Among the major parties, 2(5%) out of 40 candidates analysed from NDPP, 1(5%) out of 20 candidates analysed from BJP, 1(5%) out of 22 candidates analysed from NPF and 1 (4%) out of 23 candidates
analysed from INC have declared criminal cases
against themselves in their affidavits.
Figure: Party Wise Percentage
of Candidates with Criminal Cases
- Party wise
Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Among the major parties,1(3%) out of 40 candidates analysed from NDPP, 1(5%) out of 20 candidates analysed from BJP and 1 (5%) out of 22 candidates
analysed from NPF have declared serious criminal
cases against themselves in their affidavits.
- Candidates with
declared cases related to murder: 2 candidates have declared cases related to murder (IPC Section-302)
against themselves.
- Candidates with
declared cases related to attempt to murder: 1 candidate has declared a case related
to Attempt to murder (IPC Section-307) against himself.
- The directions of the Supreme
Court have had no effect on the
political parties in selection of candidates in the Nagaland Assembly Elections 2023 as they have again followed their
old practice of giving tickets to around
4% candidates with criminal cases. All major parties contesting in Nagaland
elections have given tickets to 4 %
to 5 % candidates who have declared
criminal cases against themselves. The Supreme Court in its directions dated
13th February, 2020 had specifically
instructed political parties to give reasons
for such selection and why other
individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates.
As per these mandatory guidelines, the reasons for such selection has to be
with reference to qualifications,
achievements and merit of the candidate concerned. During the recent 7 State Assembly
elections held in 2022, it was observed that political parties gave unfounded and baseless reasons like
popularity of the person, does good social work, cases are politically
motivated etc. These are not sound and
cogent reasons for fielding candidates with tainted backgrounds. This data
clearly shows that political parties
have no interest in reforming the electoral system and our democracy will
continue to suffer at the hands of lawbreakers who become lawmakers.
Financial Background
Figure: Share of Wealth among the Contesting Candidates
- Share of
wealth among candidates: The share of wealth amongst the candidates
contesting in the Nagaland assembly
elections 2023 is as follows:
Value of assets (Rs.)
|
Number of candidates
|
Percentage of Candidates
|
5 crores and above
|
57
|
31%
|
2 crores to 5 crores
|
32
|
17%
|
50 lakhs to 2 crores
|
48
|
26%
|
10 lakhs to 50 lakhs
|
27
|
15%
|
less than 10 lakhs
|
20
|
11%
|
Table: Share of wealth
amongst contesting candidates
- Crorepati
Candidates: Out of the 184 candidates, 116(63%) are crorepatis. In the 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections,
out of 193 candidates, 114 (59%) were crorepatis.

Figure: Comparative Analysis of Crorepati Candidates: 2018 Vs 2023
- Party wise
Crorepati Candidates: The role of money power in our
elections is evident from the fact that all major political parties give
tickets to wealthy candidates. Among the major
parties 18(90%) out of 20 candidates
analysed from BJP, 34(85%) out of 40 candidates analysed from NDPP, 13(59%) out of 22 candidates analysed from NPF, 4(57%) out of 7 candidates analysed from JD(U)
and 6(26%) out of 23 candidates analysed from INC have
declared assets valued more than Rs 1 crore.

Figure: Party Wise Percentage of Crorepati Candidates
- Average assets: The average of assets per candidate contesting
in the Nagaland Assembly Elections 2023
is Rs 5.13 Crores. In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, average
assets per candidate for 193 candidates was Rs.3.76 Crores.
- Party wise
average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per
candidate for 40 NDPP candidates analysed
is Rs. 7.47 Crores, 23 INC candidates analysed is Rs 65.98 Lakhs, 22 NPF candidates
analysed is Rs 2.32 Crores, 20 BJP candidates analysed is Rs
6.58 Crores and 7 JD(U) candidates have
average assets worth Rs.5.14 Crores.
- High asset
candidates: The
details of top 3 candidates with
highest declared assets, contesting in the Nagaland Assembly Elections are
given below:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party
Name
|
Movable
Assets (Rs)
|
Immovable
Assets (Rs)
|
Total
Assets (Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
1
|
Dr Sukhato A Sema
|
PUGHOBOTO
|
PUGHOBOTO (ST)
|
Lok Janshakti
Party(Ram Vilas)
|
11,30,34,670
|
1,48,85,96,820
|
1,60,16,31,490
160 Crore+
|
Y
|
2
|
Neiphiu Rio
|
KOHIMA
|
NORTHERN
ANGAMI-II (ST)
|
NDPP
|
15,99,07,855
|
30,96,00,000
|
46,95,07,855
46 Crore+
|
Y
|
3
|
Er Kahuli Sema
|
ZUNHEBOTO
|
ATOIZU (ST)
|
BJP
|
52,23,522
|
33,52,83,400
|
34,05,06,922
34 Crore+
|
Y
|
Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets
- Low assets
candidates: The details of three candidates with lowest assets are as follows:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party
Name
|
Movable Assets
(Rs)
|
Immovable
Assets (Rs)
|
Total
Assets (Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
1
|
T Ngampai Konyak
|
MON
|
PHOMCHING (ST)
|
INC
|
5,251
|
0
|
5,251
5 Thou+
|
N
|
2
|
H Chingsak Konyak
|
MON
|
PHOMCHING (ST)
|
NPF
|
25,000
|
0
|
25,000
25 Thou+
|
Y
|
3
|
Dr. Chingo Walim
|
MON
|
TEHOK (ST)
|
IND
|
50,000
|
0
|
50,000
50 Thou+
|
Y
|
Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets
- Candidates with high liabilities: 40(22%) candidates have declared
liabilities in their affidavits. The
details of top three candidates with highest liabilities are given below:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party
Name
|
Total
Assets(Rs)
|
Liabilities
(Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
1
|
H. Khehovi
|
ZUNHEBOTO
|
SURUHUTO (ST)
|
BJP
|
13,78,88,494
13 Crore+
|
20,88,60,666
20 Crore+
|
Y
|
2
|
Z. Kasheto Yeptho
|
DIMAPUR
|
GHASPANI-II (ST)
|
Republican Party
of India (Athawale)
|
9,30,27,207
9 Crore+
|
3,00,00,000
3 Crore+
|
Y
|
3
|
Y. Vikheho Swu
|
PUGHOBOTO
|
PUGHOBOTO (ST)
|
NDPP
|
11,30,80,371
11 Crore+
|
1,32,50,692
1 Crore+
|
Y
|
Table: Top three candidates with
highest liabilities
- Candidates with high income as declared in
the ITR*: The details of top
3 candidates with high income declared in ITR are given below:
S.No.
|
Name
|
Party Name
|
Constituency
|
District
|
Total Asset (Rs)
|
Self-Source of
Income
|
Spouse's Source
of Income
|
The financial
year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate
|
Total income
shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs)
|
Self-income shown
by candidate in ITR (Rs)
|
1
|
H. Tovihoto Ayemi
|
BJP
|
DIMAPUR-I
|
DIMAPUR
|
9,27,98,830
9 Crore+
|
MLA, Advisor,
Power, Government of Nagaland, Business
|
Business
|
2022-2023
|
91,66,238 91 Lacs+
|
54,32,320 54 Lacs+
|
2
|
T N Mannen
|
NDPP
|
IMPUR (ST)
|
MOKOKCHUNG
|
15,42,02,035
15 Crore+
|
Pension, House
Rent
|
Monthly Pension,
House Rent
|
2021-2022
|
73,63,760 73 Lacs+
|
28,77,800 28 Lacs+
|
3
|
Dr.Kekhrielhoulie
Yhome
|
NDPP
|
NORTHERN ANGAMI-I
(ST)
|
KOHIMA
|
14,12,68,343
14 Crore+
|
Salary /
Miscellaneous
|
Salary
|
2021-2022
|
61,45,236 61 Lacs+
|
27,31,159 27 Lacs+
|
Table: Top 3 candidates with highest
income as declared in ITR
- Undeclared PAN: Only 1 candidate has not declared his PAN details.
Other Background Details
- Education details of candidates: 49(27%) candidates have declared their educational qualifications to be between 8th
and 12th standard while 128 (70%) candidates have
declared having an educational qualification of graduate or above. 4 candidates are Diploma holders. 1 candidate has declared himself to be just literate and 2 candidates
are Illiterates.
- Age details of candidates: 19(10%)
candidates have declared their age to be between 25 to 40 years while 112(61%) candidates have declared their
age to be between 41 to 60 years. There are 51(28%) candidates who have declared their age to be
between 61 to 80 years. 2 candidates have
declared their age above 80 years.
- Gender details of candidates: 4(2%) female candidates are contesting in the Nagaland assembly election 2023.
In 2018 Nagaland Assembly Elections, 5(3%) out of 193 candidates analysed were women.
Recommendations of ADR
- To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act
upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and
citizens. The Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice
and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for
their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required
laws.
- Permanent disqualification of candidates convicted for heinous crimes
like murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity, kidnapping etc.
- Disqualification of persons from contesting elections to the public
offices against whom charges have been framed for having committed serious
criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of at least 5 years,
and the case is filed at least 6 months prior to the election in question.
- Cancellation of tax exemptions given to the political parties
who field such tainted candidates.
- Bringing political parties under the Right to Information
Act.
- De-register and de-recognise any political party if it knowingly puts up
a candidate with a tainted background.
- Political parties should annually file the information on criminal
antecedents of their Office Bearers and make such records available to
the public, including NIL records.
- Disqualification of candidates furnishing false information in the
election affidavit (Form 26).
- Ensure trial of cases in which the politicians are accused to be
concluded in a time bound manner.
- Implementation of SC judgment dated 23rd September,
2013 (i.e provision of NOTA buttons on the EVMs) in its letter
and spirit by ensuring a) if NOTA gets more votes
than any of the candidates, none of the candidates should be declared
elected, and a fresh election should be held; b) in the fresh
election, none of the candidates in the earlier election, in
which NOTA got the highest number of votes, should be allowed to
contest.
- Implementation of the 25th September,
2018 and 13th February, 2020 SC orders
on 'publication of criminal cases against candidates selected by
political parties along with reasons for such selection' in its letter
and spirit by directing the Election Commission of India a) to list
out names of such tainted candidates selected by the political parties along
with such reasons for such selection C8 including diligent publication of
reasons in newspapers, T.V channels, party website etc, b) strict and constant
reminders by ROs to the defaulters, c) list needs to be religiously prepared
and submitted to the Supreme Court after every election, d) uploading of this
list on ECI’s website for public inspection, e) a suitably
heavy financial penalty levied on political parties for making
insufficient disclosures, invalid and common reasons, selection of candidates
based on winnability and f) Officer in-charge of a political party
pertaining to submission of a compliance report should also be held accountable
for such a breach.
- The Election Commission of India and all State
Election Commissions should make it mandatory in all
elections; Parliamentary, Assembly and Local Body elections to carry display
boards outside each and every polling booth showing a summarised version of
candidates’ affidavits. The polling booths should essentially display
details of candidate’s criminal records, assets and liabilities and
education qualification.
- The Election Commission of India under its
‘Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation’ (SVEEP) as well
as through other national campaigns on voter awareness held before every
election should inform and aware the voters that (i)
taking and giving cash or gifts/freebies for votes is a criminal offense, (ii)
such instances should be brought to the notice of the ECI through its web
application, (iii) inform voters that information on criminal records of
candidates is available on the ECI website, outside polling booths and other
sources that the ECI may use.
- Political parties in India should be required to
announce/publish the list of
candidates contesting elections at least 3 months prior to
elections.
- Role of money and muscle power is evident
from the fact that all major political parties in Nagaland assembly elections 2023 have fielded 26% to 90% candidates who
are crorepatis and 4% to 5% candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. This
close and alarming nexus between money power and muscle power has got so
ingrained in our electoral system that the citizens are left hostage to the
current situation. Money and muscle power hurt the principles
of 'free and fair elections', 'participatory democracy' and 'level
playing field'. The present circumstances therefore
demand an extensive deliberation by the voters so that sanctity of
elections is not ridiculed by tenacious entry of tainted candidates and
candidates with abnormal multiplication of assets.
Contact Details
Association
for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch
--