Date: July 06, 2026
According to Section 78 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, every contesting candidate has to lodge a true copy of his election expenses within 30 days from the date of declaration of result of election, with the District Election Officer in all States and Union Territories. Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and Puducherry Election Watch have analysed all 30 election expenditure statements submitted after the Puducherry Assembly Election 2026 for newly elected MLAs. The expenditure limit for the MLAs during the Puducherry Assembly elections was Rs. 28 lakhs. These election expense documents include details of expenses on public meetings and processions, campaigning through electronic and print media, expense on campaign workers, expense on vehicles used, expense on virtual campaign, expense on publishing of declaration regarding criminal cases and expense on campaign materials.

4. Top 3 MLAs with highest Election Expenses: The details of top 3 MLAs who have declared highest election expenses are given below:
|
S.No. |
Name |
District |
Constituency |
Party |
Expense Limit (Rs.) |
Total expenses incurred (Rs.) |
% of limit reached |
|
1 |
Malladi Krishna Rao |
Puducherry |
Yanam |
All India N.R. Congress |
28,00,000 |
21,41,603 |
76% |
|
2 |
P. Karthikeyan |
Puducherry |
Oussudu (SC) |
INC |
28,00,000 |
20,87,811 |
75% |
|
3 |
Senthil Alias Ramesh |
Puducherry |
Kalapet |
DMK |
28,00,000 |
20,40,522 |
73% |
Table: Top 3 MLAs with highest election expenditure
5. MLAs with lowest Election Expenses: The details of 3 MLAs who have declared lowest election expenses are given below:
|
S.No. |
Name |
District |
Constituency |
Party |
Expense Limit (Rs.) |
Total expenses incurred (Rs.) |
% of limit reached |
|
1 |
E. Mohandoss |
Puducherry |
Embalam (SC) |
All India N.R. Congress |
28,00,000 |
2,86,815 |
10% |
|
2 |
V. Cartigueyane |
Puducherry |
Nellithope |
DMK |
28,00,000 |
3,97,064 |
14% |
|
3 |
Azhagu Alias Azhaganantham |
Puducherry |
Kadirgamam |
IND |
28,00,000 |
**4,55,497 |
16% |
Table: 3 MLAs with lowest election expenditure
**on total expenses value indicates that the MLA has not provided the total in their expenditure affidavits, it has been calculated on the basis of details provided by them in the same
6. Expense on Public Meeting, Rally, and Processions with Star Campaigners (other than those for general party propaganda): Out of the 30 MLAs analyzed, 14 (47%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on public meetings, processions etc. with star campaigners (other than those for general party propaganda) and 16 (53%) MLAs have declared that they have not spent any funds on public meetings, processions etc. with star campaigners (other than those for general party propaganda).
7. Expense on Public Meeting, Rally, and Processions without Star Campaigners (other than the ones with star campaigners of the political party): Out of the 30 MLAs analyzed, 21 (70%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on public meetings, processions etc. without star campaigners (other than the ones with star campaigners of the political party) and 9 (30%) MLAs have declared that they have not spent any funds on public meetings, processions etc. without star campaigners (other than the ones with star campaigners of the political party).
8. Expense on Campaigning through electronic/print media: 10 (33%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on campaigning through electronic/print media and 20 (67%) MLAs have declared that they have not spent any funds on campaigning through electronic/print media.
9. Expense on Campaign Workers: 25 (83%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on campaign workers and 5 (17%) MLAs have declared that they have not spent any funds on campaign workers.
10. Expense on Campaign Materials: 27 (90%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on campaign materials and 3 (10%) MLAs have declared that they have not spent any funds on campaign materials.
11. Expense on Campaign Vehicles: All 30(100%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on campaign vehicles.
12. Expense on Publishing of Declaration Regarding Criminal Cases: Out of the 15 MLAs analysed with declared criminal cases, all 15 (100%) MLAs have declared that they have spent funds on publishing of declarations regarding criminal cases.


1. Percentage Breakdown of funds Raised by MLAs: Out of the total funds received by MLAs, 49 % funds were raised from political parties, 38% were raised by MLAs themselves and 13% funds were raised from other sources.
2. MLAs Who Raised Funds from Political Parties: Out of the 30 MLAs analyzed, 12 (40%) MLAs have declared that they have received funds from political parties and 18 (60%) MLAs have declared that they have not received any funds from political parties.
3. MLAs Who Raised Funds through any person/ company/ firm/ associations/ body of persons etc as loan, gift or donation etc: Out of the 30 MLAs analyzed, 8 (27%) MLAs have declared that they have received funds from any person/ company/ firm/ associations/ body of persons etc as loan, gift or donation etc. and 22 (73%) MLAs have declared that they have not received any funds from any person/ company/ firm/ associations/ body of persons etc as loan, gift or donation etc.
4. Self-funds used for election campaign: Out of the 30 MLAs analyzed, 29 (97%) MLAs have declared that they have used their own funds for their election campaign and 1 (3%) MLA has declared that he has not used any of his own funds for his election campaign.
Puducherry Election Watch
|
P. Joseph Victor Raj State Co-ordinator |
Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch
|
Media and Journalist Helpline
Email: a...@adrindia.org |
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd) Head Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch 011 4165 4200, a...@adrIndia.org, |
Prof Trilochan Sastry Chairman, Founder & Trustee Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch Visiting Faculty, IIM Bangalore |
Dr. Ajit Ranade Founder Member & Trustee Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |