Press Release: Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Phase V: Analysis of Criminal Background, Financial, Education, Gender and other Details of Candidates
ADR India
Dear Friends,
Criminal Background
- Candidates with Criminal Cases: 159(23%) out of 695 candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.
- Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 122(18%) out of 695 have declared serious criminal cases against themselves.
- Candidates with Declared Convicted Cases: 3 candidates have declared cases where they have been convicted.
- Candidates with cases related to Murder: 4 candidates have declared cases related to murder (IPC Section -302) against themselves.
- Candidates with cases related to Attempt to Murder: 28 candidates have declared cases related to attempt to murder (IPC Section 307) against themselves.
- Candidates with cases related to Crime Against Women: 29 candidates have declared cases related to crime against women. Out of 29 candidates 1 candidate has declared charge related to rape (IPC Section-376).
- Candidates with cases related to Hate Speech: 10 candidates have declared cases related to hate speech against themselves.
Figure: Category Wise Candidates with Declared Criminal Cases
- Party wise Candidates with Criminal Cases: Among the major parties, 5(50%) out of 10 candidates from SP, 3(50%) out of 6 candidates from Shiv Sena, 2(50%) out of 4 candidates from AIMIM, 19(48%) out of 40 candidates from BJP, 8(44%) out of 18 candidates from INC, 3(43%) out of 7 candidates from AITC, 3(38%) out of 8 candidates from Shivsena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray), 1(25%) out of 4 candidates from RJD and 1 (20%) out of 5 candidates from BJD have declared criminal cases against themselves.
- Party wise Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: Among the major parties, 2(50%) out of 4 candidates from AIMIM, 4(40%) out of 10 candidates from SP, 7(39%) out of 18 candidates from INC, 2(33%) out of 6 candidates from Shiv Sena, 12(30%) out of 40 candidates from BJP, 2(29%) out of 7 candidates from AITC, 1(25%) out of 4 candidates from RJD and 1 (13%) out of 8 candidates from Shivsena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) have declared serious criminal cases against themselves.
- Red Alert Constituencies*: 26(53%) out of 49 constituencies are red alert constituencies in the Lok Sabha elections 2024 phase V. Red alert constituencies are those constituencies where 3 or more contesting candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.
- The directions of the Supreme Court have had no effect on the political parties in selection of candidates in the Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Phase V as they have again followed their old practice of giving tickets to around 23% candidates with criminal cases. All major parties contesting in Lok Sabha Elections Phase 5 have given tickets from 20 % to 50 % candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. The Supreme Court in its directions dated 13th February, 2020 had specifically instructed political parties to give reasons for such selection and why other individuals without criminal antecedents could not be selected as candidates. As per these mandatory guidelines, the reasons for such selection has to be with reference to qualifications, achievements and merit of the candidate concerned. During the recent 5 State Assembly elections held in 2023, it was observed that political parties gave unfounded and baseless reasons like popularity of the person, does good social work, cases are politically motivated etc. These are not sound and cogent reasons for fielding candidates with tainted backgrounds. This data clearly shows that political parties have no interest in reforming the electoral system and our democracy will continue to suffer at the hands of lawbreakers who become lawmakers.
Financial Background
- Share of wealth among candidates: The share of wealth amongst the candidates contesting in the Lok Sabha Phase V elections is as follows:
|
Value of assets (Rs.) |
Number of candidates |
Percentage of Candidates |
|
Rs.5 cr and above |
86 |
12% |
|
Rs.2 crores to Rs. 5 crores |
73 |
11% |
|
Rs. 50 lakhs to Rs. 2 crores |
162 |
23% |
|
Rs.10 lakhs to Rs. 50 lakhs |
175 |
25% |
|
less than Rs. 10 lakhs |
199 |
29% |
Table: Share of wealth amongst contesting candidates
- Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 695 candidates, 227(33%) are Crorepatis.
- Party wise Crorepati Candidates: Among the major parties 10(100%) out of 10 candidates from SP, 6(100%) out of 6 candidates from Shiv Sena, 4(100%) out of 4 candidates from RJD, 2(100%) out of 2 candidates from Nationalist Congress Party – Sharadchandra Pawar, 36(90%) out of 40 candidates from BJP, 7(88%) out of 8 candidates from Shivsena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray), 6(86%) out of 7 candidates from AITC, 15(83%) out of 18 candidates from INC, 4(80%) out of 5 candidates from BJD and 2 (50%) candidates out of 4 candidates analysed from AIMIM have declared assets worth more than Rs. 1 crore.
- Average assets: The average asset per candidate contesting in the Lok Sabha phase V election is Rs.3.56 crores.
- Party wise average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per candidate for 2 Nationalist Congress Party – Sharadchandra Pawar candidates is Rs. 54.64 crores, 6 Shiv Sena candidates is Rs. 23.21 crores, 40 BJP candidates is Rs. 21.85 crores, 18 INC candidates is Rs 11.96 crores, 8 Shivsena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) candidates have average assets of Rs 11.92 crores, 7 AITC candidates have average assets worth Rs 11.15 crores, 4 RJD candidates have average assets worth Rs 11.05 crores, 5 BJD candidates have average assets worth Rs 4.58 crores, 10 SP candidates have average assets worth Rs 3.93 crores and 4 AlMIM candidates have average assets of Rs 2.14 crores.
- High assets candidates: The details of top 3 candidates with highest declared assets, contesting in the Lok Sabha Elections Phase V are given below:
|
S.No. |
Name |
State/UT |
Constituency |
Party |
Movable Assets (Rs) |
Immovable Assets (Rs) |
Total Assets (Rs) |
PAN Given |
|
1 |
Anurag Sharma |
Uttar Pradesh |
Jhansi |
BJP |
95,27,65,800 |
1,16,80,00,000 |
2,12,07,65,800 |
Y |
|
2 |
Nilesh Bhagwan Sambare |
Maharashtra |
Bhiwandi |
IND |
32,72,48,407 |
83,37,50,688 |
1,16,09,99,095 |
Y |
|
3 |
Piyush Goyal |
Maharashtra |
Mumbai North |
BJP |
89,86,56,447 |
21,08,58,000 |
1,10,95,14,447 |
Y |
Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets
- Zero Assets Candidates: There is 1 candidate who has declared zero assets.
- Low assets candidates: The details of three candidates with lowest assets (excluding zero assets candidate) are as follows:
|
S.No. |
Name |
State/UT |
Constituency |
Party Name |
Movable Assets (Rs) |
Immovable Assets (Rs) |
Total Assets (Rs) |
PAN Given |
|
1 |
Mohammad Sultan Ganaie |
Jammu and Kashmir |
Baramulla |
IND |
67 |
0 |
67 |
Y |
|
2 |
Mukesh Kumar |
Bihar |
Muzaffarpur |
IND |
700* |
0 |
700 |
N |
|
3 |
Surajit Hembram |
West Bengal |
Hooghly |
IND |
5,427 |
0 |
5,427 |
Y |
Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets
* On assets value indicates that the candidate has not provided the total in their affidavits, it has been calculated on the basis of details provided by them in the same
- Candidates with high liabilities: 327(47%) candidates have declared liabilities in their affidavits. The details of top three candidates with highest liabilities are given below:
|
S.No. |
Name |
State/UT |
Constituency |
Party Name |
Total Assets (Rs) |
Liabilities (Rs) |
PAN Given |
|
1 |
Suresh Gopinath Mhatre Alias Balya Mama |
Maharashtra |
Bhiwandi |
Nationalist Congress Party – Sharadchandra Pawar |
1,07,55,34,826 |
75,65,59,886 |
Y |
|
2 |
Sanjay Mafatlal Morakhia |
Maharashtra |
Mumbai North |
IND |
48,43,72,533 |
39,24,05,345 |
Y |
|
3 |
Karan Bhushan Singh |
Uttar Pradesh |
Kaiserganj |
BJP |
49,56,81,640 |
22,93,59,344 |
Y |
Table: top 3 candidates with high liabilities
- Undeclared PAN: 13 candidates have not given PAN details.
- Candidates with high income as declared in the ITR*: The details of top 3 candidates with high income declared in ITR are given below:
|
S.No. |
Name |
Party Name |
Constituency |
State/UT |
Total Assets (Rs) |
Self Source of Income |
Spouse's Source of Income |
The financial year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate |
Total income shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs) |
Self income shown by candidate in ITR (Rs) |
|
1 |
Anurag Sharma |
BJP |
Jhansi |
Uttar Pradesh |
2,12,07,65,800 212 Crore+ |
Salary, Business, Agriculture, Rent, Interest |
Salary, Business, Agriculture, Rent, Interest |
2022-2023 |
13,54,34,842 13 Crore+ |
10,61,69,792 10 Crore+ |
|
2 |
Rohini Acharya |
RJD |
Saran |
Bihar |
36,62,40,901 36 Crore+ |
Rental Income |
Professional Income |
2022-2023 |
6,77,37,763 6 Crore+ |
3,16,360 3 Lacs+ |
|
3 |
Kalyan Banerjee |
AITC |
Sreerampur |
West Bengal |
30,54,79,471 30 Crore+ |
Legal Practitioner (Senior Advocate), Salary Interest from Saving and Investment & House Rent |
Business (Saree Boutique), Interest from Saving and Investment |
2022-2023 |
4,35,88,866 4 Crore+ |
4,32,63,266 4 Crore+ |
Table: Top 3 Candidates with highest income declared in ITR
*Some Candidates may be exempted from filing ITR
** As per section 10 (26) of IT Act 1961, a member of ST residing in specific area of in Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura or Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir is exempt from paying IT.
Other Background Details
- Education details of candidates: 293(42%) candidates have declared their educational qualifications to be between 5th and 12th standard while 349(50%) candidates have declared having an educational qualification of graduate or above. 26 candidates are Diploma holders. 20 candidates have declared themselves to be just literate and 5 candidates are Illiterates. 2 candidates have not given their educational qualification.
- Age details of candidates: 207(30%) candidates have declared their age to be between 25 to 40 years while 384(55%) candidates have declared their age to be between 41 to 60 years. There are 103(15%) candidates who have declared their age to be between 61 to 80 years. 1 candidate has declared his age as 82 years.
- Gender details of candidates: 82(12%) female candidates are contesting in the Lok Sabha Phase V elections.
- To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and citizens. Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required laws.
- Permanent disqualification of candidates convicted for heinous crimes like murder, rape, smuggling, dacoity, kidnapping etc.
- Disqualification of persons from contesting elections to the public offices against whom charges have been framed for having committed serious criminal offences punishable by imprisonment of at least 5 years, and the case is filed at least 6 months prior to the election in question.
- Cancellation of tax exemptions given to the political parties who field such tainted candidates.
- Bringing political parties under the Right to Information Act.
- De-register and de-recognise any political party if it knowingly puts up a candidate with a tainted background.
- Political party should annually file the information on criminal antecedents of their Office Bearers and make such records available to the public, including NIL records.
- Disqualification of candidates furnishing false information in the election affidavit (Form 26).
- Ensure trial of cases in which the politicians are accused to be concluded in a time bound manner.
- Implementation of SC judgment dated 23rd September, 2013 (i.e provision of NOTA buttons on the EVMs) in its letter and spirit by ensuring a) if NOTA gets more votes than any of the candidates, none of the candidates should be declared elected, and a fresh election should be held; b) in the fresh election, none of the candidates in the earlier election, in which NOTA got the highest number of votes, should be allowed to contest.
- Implementation of the 25th September, 2018 and 13th February, 2020 SC orders on 'publication of criminal cases against candidates selected by political parties along with reasons for such selection' in its letter and spirit by directing the Election Commission of India a) to list out names of such tainted candidates selected by the political parties along with such reasons for such selection C8 including diligent publication of reasons in newspapers, T.V channels, party website etc, b) strict and constant reminders by ROs to the defaulters, c) list needs to be religiously prepared and submitted to the Supreme Court after every election, d) uploading of this list on ECI’s website for public inspection, e) a suitably heavy financial penalty levied on political parties for making insufficient disclosures, invalid and common reasons, selection of candidates based on winnability and f) Officer in-charge of a political party pertaining to submission of a compliance report should also be held accountable for such a breach.
- The Election Commission of India and all State Election Commissions should make it mandatory in all elections; Parliamentary, Assembly and Local Body elections to carry display boards outside each and every polling booth showing a summarised version of candidates’ affidavits. The polling booths should essentially display details of candidate’s criminal records, assets and liabilities and education qualification.
- The Election Commission of India under its ‘Systematic Voters’ Education and Electoral Participation’ (SVEEP) as well as through other national campaigns on voter awareness held before every election should inform and aware the voters that (i) taking and giving cash or gifts/freebies for votes is a criminal offense, (ii) such instances should be brought to the notice of the ECI through its web application, (iii) inform voters that information on criminal records of candidates is available on the ECI website, outside polling booths and other sources that the ECI may use.
- Political parties in India should be required to announce/publish the list of candidates contesting elections at least 3 months prior to elections.
- Role of money and muscle power is evident from the fact that all major political parties in Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Phase V have fielded 50% to 100% candidates who are crorepatis and 20% to 50% candidates who have declared criminal cases against themselves. This close and alarming nexus between money power and muscle power has got so ingrained in our electoral system that the citizens are left hostage to the current situation. Money and muscle power hurt the principles of 'free and fair elections', 'participatory democracy' and 'level playing field'. The present circumstances therefore demand an extensive deliberation by the voters so that sanctity of elections is not ridiculed by tenacious entry of tainted candidates and candidates with abnormal multiplication of assets.
Association for Democratic Reforms/National Election Watch
|
Media and Journalist Helpline
Email: a...@adrindia.org |
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd) Head Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch 011 4165 4200, a...@adrIndia.org,
|
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.) Founder Member, Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |
Prof Trilochan Sastry IIM Bangalore Founder Member, Association for Democratic Reforms, National Election Watch |
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
Support Us By Donating 
ADR Press Release
Both a...@adrindia.org and adr_pres...@adrindia.org are our official email addresses for report releases.
Dear Friends,
- To remedy the existing problem of criminalization is to immediately act upon the plausible solutions offered by various committees, civil society and citizens. The Supreme Court of India being the ultimate custodian of “Justice and Rule of Law” should reprimand political parties and politicians for their complete lack of will, reprehensible predilection and absence of required laws.
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
ADR India
Dear Friends,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049